Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Gentoo Founder on his way to Redmond

Posted by timothy on Mon Jun 13, 2005 06:33 PM
from the ms-could-be-the-world's-largest-foss-company dept.
Rotworm writes "Recently former founder of Gentoo Linux, Daniel Robbins, has managed to procure employment with Microsoft. Robbins describes his position as "helping Microsoft to understand Open Source and community-based projects." Seemingly there's no scandals as Robbins managed to finalize the transfer of all Gentoo's IP to the Gentoo Foundation, Inc."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Gentoo Founder on his way to Redmond | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 527 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • hmm... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by rd4tech (711615) * <emilijan.cpuedge@com> on Monday June 13 2005, @06:34PM (#12807777)
    (http://www.minirank.com/)
    Any idea what his employment contract may hold?
    • Re:hmm... (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 13 2005, @06:35PM (#12807790)
      He's probably going to kill younglings.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:hmm... (Score:5, Funny)

        by Tackhead (54550) on Monday June 13 2005, @06:47PM (#12807922)
        > > Any idea what his employment contract may hold?
        >
        > He's probably going to kill younglings.

        Hmm...

        Do I reply with "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!" or "It's a TRAP!". Decisions, decisions...

        Decisions, decisions, decisions, decisions, decisions [ ... ] decisions! Decisions! I! LOVE! THIS! DISTRO!

        [ Parent ]
        • Re:hmm... (Score:4, Funny)

          by respyre (812609) on Monday June 13 2005, @07:34PM (#12808381)
          .. developers, developers, developers, developers, developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! *wheeze*
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:hmm... by Curtman (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @07:39PM
          • Re:hmm... by jlp2097 (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @03:54PM
        • Re:hmm... by DigiShaman (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @08:57PM
        • Re:hmm... by dakara (Score:3) Monday June 13 2005, @09:40PM
        • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:hmm... by ThomasFlip (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @07:33PM
        • Re:hmm... by Spectre_03 (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @08:18PM
          • Re:hmm... by pdbaby (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @09:09PM
      • Re:hmm... by FluffyBob (Score:1) Tuesday June 14 2005, @09:05AM
        • Re:hmm... by jbburks (Score:1) Saturday June 25 2005, @10:57AM
      • Re:hmm... by Spunk (Score:2) Wednesday June 15 2005, @09:40AM
        • Re:hmm... by DenDave (Score:2) Wednesday June 22 2005, @07:47AM
      • Re:hmm... by secolactico (Score:3) Monday June 13 2005, @09:22PM
        • * Cue the Music * by Burz (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @01:11AM
        • Re:hmm... by chrish (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @08:02AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:hmm... (Score:5, Insightful)

        by brennz (715237) on Monday June 13 2005, @09:55PM (#12809411)
        Daniels Robbins is a very smart, friendly individual that has exerted a *HUGE* amount of time, effort, and finances on Gentoo.

        As a seriously busy individual, he always took time out to talk to the little guy.

        Unfortunately, his work with Gentoo never paid the bills enough for him to rely upon it.

        How can you possibly insult someone that has a family to support, and bills to pay? He has paid his dues!

        I hope Daniel Robbins will take his customary brilliance to Microsoft and do great things. Of all corporations that need a breath of fresh air, Microsoft is foremost. Business Model reinvention la? Perhaps we can look forward to new Microsoft products being GPL'd :)

        Good luck Daniel!
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:hmm... by forgoil (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @02:40AM
          • Re:hmm... by kyojin the clown (Score:1) Tuesday June 14 2005, @05:39AM
          • Re:hmm... by flacco (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @05:40AM
            • Re:hmm... by DenDave (Score:2) Wednesday June 22 2005, @07:51AM
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:hmm... by flacco (Score:1) Tuesday June 14 2005, @05:37AM
          • Shoot the mods! by jimcooncat (Score:1) Tuesday June 14 2005, @08:33AM
          • Re:hmm... by revividus (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @08:33AM
            • Re:hmm... by flacco (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @09:26AM
          • Re:hmm... by Fade_to_Blah (Score:1) Tuesday June 14 2005, @09:28AM
            • Re:hmm... by superpulpsicle (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @12:05PM
          • Re:hmm... by flacco (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @09:29AM
          • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday June 14 2005, @06:12AM
        • I worked for GESTAPO by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday June 14 2005, @06:46AM
        • Re:hmm... by gilesjuk (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @06:52AM
        • Re:hmm... by neural cooker (Score:1) Tuesday June 14 2005, @08:51AM
        • What an embaressment by Haach (Score:3) Tuesday June 14 2005, @09:23AM
        • Re:hmm... by fbjon (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @11:56AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:hmm... by styrotech (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @12:08AM
        • Re:hmm... by rikkards (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @07:04AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:hmm... by iibbmm (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @06:36PM
      • A lot of times, things are "tied" together in contracts between an individual and a large corporation. Commonly, a single employment contract will cover hiring the employee, granting permission for employee to enter employer's premises, granting clearance to trade secrets (and a covenant not to disclose them to third parties without express permission), and granting an assignment or work-for-hire setup for the employer to use any copyright, patent, trademark, or trade secret created by the employee using employer's resources. The trouble comes when employers insist on BS riders such as broad non-compete agreements or broad "all your idea are belong to us" IP-grabs that cover works and inventions developed by the employee entirely using the employee's resources.

        [ Parent ]
    • Re:hmm... (Score:5, Funny)

      by XpirateX (691224) on Monday June 13 2005, @06:39PM (#12807842)
      Microsoft has just released a press release highlighting the new additions being implemented into Windows Longhorn (c). Most notable of these additions is an innovative "package management system" called l-merge. More information soon.
      [ Parent ]
    • MS dont give out free lunches... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by spagetti_code (773137) on Monday June 13 2005, @06:57PM (#12808030)
      Microsoft dont do anything out of the goodness of their hearts. They are a corporate entity with a fiscal responsibility to their shareholders.

      He will be brought on board to continue the MS strategy of embrace, extend (in a proprietary fashion) then replace. MS do not want to support linux in any way, they want to kill it. Dead. Every linux box sold represents money ripped from their pocket.

      My guess is that this could be something like:
      - get linux to run well on MS virtual machines, so linux can become just an app running under 2k3, and therefore slowely sink into oblivion.
      - work on their command line tools [slashdot.org]. Looks like they have finally realised that the {Li,U}n{u,i}x way of providing powerful command line utilities is actually pretty useful (perhaps learned from the struggle [securityoffice.net] when they first tried to convert hotmail to NT :-).

      Interesting times ahead.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:hmm... by rd4tech (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @07:04PM
    • Re:hmm... (Score:5, Funny)

      by dedazo (737510) on Monday June 13 2005, @07:12PM (#12808175)
      (Last Journal: Friday August 31, @07:08PM)
      Section 2A - Notwithstanding any other claimants and /or vicissitudes related to the Contractee's employment therein while at Microsoft Corporation (C)(TM), Contractee heretofore agrees in full to instruct Microsoft Corporation (C)(TM) on how to:
      • Develop an operating system that recompiles itself continuously, preventing the user from doing anything useful with their computers; and
      • Create, develop and nurture a community of obnoxious prepubescent teenagers that believe they are '1337' (see definition of '1337' in Appendix D) 'haxx0rz' (see definition of 'haxx0rz' in Appendix E) because they're 'squeezing' (see definition of 'squeezing' in Appendix M) every ounce of 'computing power' from their WalMart (TM) eMachines (TM) Celeron (TM) 'boxen' (see definition of 'boxen' in Appendix R)

      Section 2B - Contractee will also instruct Microsoft Corporation (C)(TM) on the use and operation of the computer program known as 'cvs'.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday June 14 2005, @04:28AM
    • Re:hmm... by Elranzer (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @08:50PM
    • Re:hmm... by flacco (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @06:21AM
    • Re:hmm... by rd4tech (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @07:06PM
    • Re:hmm... by rd4tech (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @07:12PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:TRUST HIM? IS HE OPEN MINDED, not just opensour by stor (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @08:40PM
    • 4 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Woah (Score:5, Funny)

    by NilObject (522433) on Monday June 13 2005, @06:35PM (#12807787)
    (http://www.fallingbullets.com/)
    "helping Microsoft to understand Open Source and community-based projects"

    Do they ship cluebats freight? I guess they do now.
    • Re:Woah by Qubit (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @06:53PM
  • When in doubt (Score:4, Insightful)

    by WebHostingGuy (825421) * on Monday June 13 2005, @06:36PM (#12807799)
    (http://www.e3servers.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday January 26 2006, @12:17PM)
    Buy them out.

    Is this the beginning of a strategy for Microsoft? Can't beat them, just buy them or the lead developer?
    • Re:When in doubt (Score:5, Insightful)

      by xtracto (837672) on Monday June 13 2005, @06:41PM (#12807852)
      (Last Journal: Saturday October 20, @06:40PM)
      Yes... just like the OSDG bought Trovalds or Google bought Firefox Developer Ben Goodger ...

      Free Software is free as in freedom... but it is also free as in beer so these people *really* need to get their green paste from somewhere...

      Or, you really did think that those "donations" where enough to live?
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:When in doubt by Spy der Mann (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @06:48PM
    • Re:When in doubt by Nasarius (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @06:51PM
    • Re:When in doubt by EraserMouseMan (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @06:56PM
    • Re:When in doubt (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 13 2005, @06:56PM (#12808026)
      Microsoft has headhunted the competition before. This is not new for them or anyone else. The only difference here is that MS has a known, powerful, flexible enemy in Open Source. We're like a hydra; cut off one of our heads, two more will (eventually) grow in its place.

      Plus, the "change things from the inside" thing isn't new either. The MS Macintosh Business Unit, formerly MS Bay, consisted primarily of Mac shareware and commercial SW developers who had been hired to work on Mac Office and Mac IE. These were guys who thought, ate, drank, and slept "Different." They are the reason Mac Office tends to leapfrog Windows Office in features and overall quality with every release, and also why IE on the Mac didn't suck. Anyway, even these guys ended up chugging the Kool-Aid - when Apple started releasing competitive products (most recently Safari), these guys acted as if it was their God-given right to be the exclusive developers of these types of software, going on record in the Mac press, denouncing Apple for daring to create competing products. Somehow they'd gotten into the MS mindset of expecting that their (MS's) stuff was supposed to be the only stuff around to support the OS, or to be treated as first-class citizens. The difference was that Apple didn't have to support this same opinion.

      Back on-topic a bit, I think the gentards have nothing to worry or be ashamed about. Even though he'll probably turn with time, this isn't a pride thing. Maybe he just needs to eat, and wants to use his skills as a means towards that goal (shocking!). Who knows, maybe working for the bad guys really will change them for the better.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:When in doubt by ubuntu (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @07:17PM
    • Re:When in doubt by jumbledInTheHead (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @07:36PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Not New.. MS did this to borland by acomj (Score:3) Monday June 13 2005, @08:22PM
    • Re:When in doubt by jusdisgi (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @09:35AM
    • Re:When in doubt by wolf31o2 (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @01:38PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Good luck! (Score:5, Funny)

    by stevens (84346) on Monday June 13 2005, @06:36PM (#12807804)
    (http://slashdot.org/)

    I hope he is successful! I'd sure like to see Windows users have to emerge msoffice2k3 and wait for six days.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 13 2005, @06:37PM (#12807809)
    all your open source visionaries are belong to ms.
  • Sweet Job! (Score:5, Funny)

    by TheSolomon (247633) on Monday June 13 2005, @06:37PM (#12807810)
    (http://www.digitalpimp.net/ThePimp/)
    Man I wish I had his job. "OpenSource projects: Opposite in every way from Microsoft. Now where's my paycheck?!" =)
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Dr Who (Score:5, Funny)

    by lkcl (517947) on Monday June 13 2005, @06:37PM (#12807812)
    (http://lkcl.net/)
    is anyone here concerned about the parallels with the latest episode of Dr Who?

    the game-shows where losers are beamed up to the Dalek Mothership?

    EXTERMINATE!
    EXTERMINATE!

  • power by hhawk (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @06:37PM
    • Re:power by jumbledInTheHead (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @07:40PM
  • Borgs Are Here... by creimer (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @06:38PM
  • Linuxsoft (Score:3, Funny)

    by Rotworm (649729) on Monday June 13 2005, @06:38PM (#12807830)
    (http://www.rotworm.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday April 27 2004, @11:14AM)
    And thusly we see the beginning of taking over Microsoft by getting on the inside, one at a time.
  • Wow, what a short article (Score:3, Interesting)

    by craXORjack (726120) on Monday June 13 2005, @06:39PM (#12807839)
    I RTFA but it was redundant!

    Seriously, I hope he didn't accept low pay with the promise of stock options like a lot of Microsoft employees have in the past. The day of the Microsoft made millionnaires is over.
  • ok by SQLz (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @06:40PM
    • Re:ok (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Martin Marvinski (581860) on Monday June 13 2005, @06:58PM (#12808046)
      Its 2005, MS is hiring people to 'help them understand open source'. There has to be some HUGE f**ing idiots working there.
      No, what they are trying to do is to break up the opensource community by hiring all the top talent. If they hire the top leaders and put them in project s that never see the light of day, then they don't have to worry about them as competitors to MS. It is worth the million or two in salary to get a top guy. The get the facts ad campaign probably is less effective than buying the top guys out.
      MS has a history of doing it. They hired away all the top talent at Borland. They hired COM guru Don Box, which in my opinion was to get him on board with .NET.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:ok by reidbold (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @07:07PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:ok by coldmist (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @07:26PM
      • Re:ok (Score:4, Interesting)

        what they are trying to do is to break up the opensource community by hiring all the top talent. If they hire the top leaders and put them in project s that never see the light of day, then they don't have to worry about them as competitors to MS. It is worth the million or two in salary to get a top guy.

        Which can be summed up as

        "Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer"

        Surprised no-one else quoted that one first....
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:ok by I_can_not_believe_I_ (Score:1) Tuesday June 14 2005, @01:19AM
        • Re:ok by MartinG (Score:3) Tuesday June 14 2005, @04:07AM
          • Re:ok by Dogtanian (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @05:30AM
          • Re:ok by L505 (Score:1) Tuesday June 14 2005, @09:56AM
        • Re:ok by mikefe (Score:2) Wednesday June 15 2005, @05:18PM
      • Re:ok by yahwotqa (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @08:48PM
      • Re:ok by aardvark007 (Score:1) Tuesday June 14 2005, @09:15AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • hummmm by WindBourne (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @07:20PM
    • Re:Uhhh by gosand (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @07:14PM
      • Re:Uhhh by praxis (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @07:22PM
        • Re:Uhhh by gosand (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @11:57AM
      • Re:Uhhh by thejoelpatrol (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @08:27PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • borg by fearanddread (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @06:40PM
  • Kamikaze (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Bifurcati (699683) on Monday June 13 2005, @06:41PM (#12807860)
    (http://www.illuminatingscience.org/)
    "helping Microsoft to understand Open Source and community-based projects."

    I think Microsoft already understand Open Source projects - and, quite obviously and unsurprisingly, they don't like them. Justifiable from a business perspective, crap from (almost) everyone else's perspective, and I have trouble seeing what change he could bring in Microsoft.

    Unless of course he's got several kilograms of TNT strapped to his chest when he has his first meeting with Bill :)

    • Re:Kamikaze by ky11x (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @08:37PM
    • Re:Kamikaze by sharkey (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @08:37PM
  • Former Founder? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Iffy Bonzoolie (1621) <{iffy} {at} {xarble.org}> on Monday June 13 2005, @06:41PM (#12807862)
    (Last Journal: Tuesday August 31 2004, @08:05PM)
    "Recently former founder of Gentoo Linux[...]"

    How can someone be a former founder? Once you found something, that's it, you always will have been the founder, right? I mean the Founding Fathers of America aren't the Former Founding Fathers - they are still the Founding Fathers even though they are all dead, and don't take much of an active interest in the affairs of the country anymore.

    -If
  • This is bad (Score:5, Insightful)

    by diegocgteleline.es (653730) on Monday June 13 2005, @06:41PM (#12807865)
    I wouldn't mind this if Microsoft used this help to "understand opensource better and collaborate with it"

    Microsoft is not going to do that. They want to know everything about open source because the want to compete with it, ie: beat us. It'd be nicer if Microsoft used this help to collaborate with opensource better, opensource things, etc etc.
    • Re:This is bad by xtracto (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @06:57PM
    • Bad moderation (Score:5, Insightful)

      by WebCowboy (196209) on Monday June 13 2005, @07:25PM (#12808297)
      As I write this, the post I am responding to is modded "Troll". Seems it is more "Insightful" than anything else.

      BillG is a smart guy who surrounds himself with smart guys. MS started out of a motel room in New Mexico and didn't become a near monopoly solely out of luck any more than it did out of sheer creativity. MS is huge for a few important reasons:

      1. They recognise opportunities and make maximum use of their resources and connections. MS became the "king of programming languages" for micros inthe 70s and 80s because BillG immediately saw the potential of the Altair and the desperate need for a friendlier method of programming the system. They also used their connections and networking skills to arrange a meeting with IBM re. DOS as well as to locate and purchase QDOS.

      2. They are a bit sneaky--they will sell something they don't even have yet (DOS) and create demoware/vapourware to stall and kill competition in a field where they are lacking (GO/pen computing/etc--"they might have it now, but big ol' MS is gonna have it REAL SOON NOW"--yeah right).

      3. THEY RESEARCH THEIR COMPETITON--MS has historically been very paranoid. Even with their position today they view EVERY competitior as one who could destroy them. When MS plays in a market they research EVERY LITTLE THING about that market and EVERY COMPETITOR. BillG himself operates that way. If he meets someone who has something interesting to talk about but BillG knows nothing about it, BillG will spend every waking moment for a couple days learning about the subject. The next time he meets that person he can talk with that person like he is a seasoned expert.

      It is for that third reason why MS has a whole department of Open Source Specialists in its employ and has had for years. It is also how the Halloween Memos came to be. It doesn't matter how badly MS slags Linux or how much it scoffs at Free software--it has ALWAYS apporached it as competition with the potential to destroy Microsoft. I'm willing to bet it's been on BillG's personal radar for a decade already (when MS was just starting to realise the Internet was a game they had to play).

      So the parent to this post is exactly right: MS is essentially "stockpiling ammunition" for the battle with Free software. How they will use the knowledge and people they acquire could go many ways:

      1. They could use it to make their FUD sound more credible--for example, some weakness in Linux to exploit in the "get the facts" campaign or items to avoid or downplay where Linux has the advantage.

      2. MS operates by acquisition, not innovation. They might have to avoid GPL code to keep its code secret, but it can at least steal IDEAS from GNU apps. It is also already well known they've lifted BSD code many times. This is OK though--at least MS software gets better as a result.

      3. If they CAN'T beat Free software, they'll be prepared to "join" it. It may be a cold day in hell before MS Office is open, but if Linux meets or beats Apple's market share and all indications are that it won't go away, MS will be prepared to form a "Linux business unit" to port Office and other apps to the platform. It won't be "Free/Libre", but if MS dominates application software for Linux it can steer the platform and continue to be the industry's biggest player. This is what they have done with Apple--Microsoft is the biggest vendor of MacOS applications, and stunning industrial design aside, Macs are becoming more and more PC-like.

      Yep it would be nice if MS was more cooperative, but it is just too far from their business model. MS NEEDS software to be closed or else it would have to completely re-invent itself. It is simply easier for it to try and make the competition work to its advantage or simply go away.
      [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • In other words by mcc (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @06:42PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Anakin (Score:5, Funny)

    by srobert (4099) on Monday June 13 2005, @06:43PM (#12807880)
    In a related story, Anakin Skywalker is serving as an aid to Senator Palpatine to help him understand the Jedi council.
    • Re:Anakin by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @06:59PM
    • Re:Anakin by sivadbp (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @07:56PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Anakin by jack_csk (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @10:09PM
    • Re:Anakin by jack_csk (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @10:15PM
    • I'd like to point out... by HotButteredHampster (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @10:54PM
    • Re:Anakin by Nik Picker (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @12:39AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Alternate pathway (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Adrilla (830520) * on Monday June 13 2005, @06:43PM (#12807887)
    If Microsoft truly wants to get in touch with the Open Source community, why remove Robbins from it completely. I think they would do better to make him a paid freelance consultant. I believe that once he's gone to "the dark side" in the community's eyes, he'll never be able to look at the movement from an insider's point of view again. But now, MS will have taken a big player away, and as I see it, they're simply killing of bit of competition and will use this knowledge to kill more. But then again, I see MS as not wanting OSS to exist at all. I believe a more faith based relationship will have been developed between MS and the OS community if they had gone the consultant route, allowing Robbins to continue to develop there, but keep MS abreast of what's going on and how they could coexist more peacefully or even intermingle.
  • Isn't this... by Teh_monkeyCode (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @06:43PM
  • hrm by St. Arbirix (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @06:43PM
    • Re:hrm by flacco (Score:2) Tuesday June 14 2005, @06:17AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • former founder? by xluserpetex (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @06:44PM
  • by Tsugumi (553059) on Monday June 13 2005, @06:46PM (#12807914)
    The scene, drobbins standing in front of a bunch of expectant microsoft execs, all with their own pc.

    "Today, class, we're going to learn about kde..."

    ...Two days and several thousand lines of gcc output later...

    "Err, Mr Robbins sir, is this going to take much longer? I gotta go pee"

  • NOOOOOOOOO! by Klync (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @06:47PM
  • by javaxman (705658) on Monday June 13 2005, @06:48PM (#12807950)
    (Last Journal: Monday January 23 2006, @12:19PM)
    It's official, we've crossed over into the Bizarro World.
  • I used to say that I sold my soul.. by BerntB (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @06:53PM
  • Insert here by beforewisdom (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @06:53PM
  • Translation: by HockeyPuck (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @06:55PM
  • I'm assuming... by vergil9801 (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @06:56PM
  • The Microsoft Memo by chx1975 (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @06:56PM
  • I wish him well (Score:5, Interesting)

    by overshoot (39700) on Monday June 13 2005, @06:57PM (#12808037)
    Dude put some good work into a fine distro, sorry he couldn't make a living at it. I'll never knock anyone for keeping the family fed.

    Anyone else notice that this isn't the first ABQ->Redmond migration for a "distribution" founder?

  • I thought that today... by ratta (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @07:02PM
  • next thing you know... by Moustache N Tits (Score:1) Monday June 13 2005, @07:04PM
  • We'll cut the armed convoy off at SR-520 when they cross the floating bridge across Lake Washington and free him! I'll go rent a canoe down next to Husky Stadium and we'll rendevous at the traffic jam near the wind sculptures and set him free, then we'll transport him to the Arboretum and escape via the Museum of History and Industry parking lot in a small biodiesel VW car a friend of mine has.

    Who's with me?

    A small daring group is all it will take to rescue the founder of Gentoo - with luck on our side, skill, daring, and the element of surprise, we should be able to pull this off before the Empire gets him into Darth Gates compound!

  • He hasn't transfered IP, domain names etc. yet by justrob (Score:2) Monday June 13 2005, @07:06PM