Debian 3.1 (Sarge) Released 411
Mister Furious writes "First, Apple switches to Intel, and now, equally shocking: Debian Sarge is released! Hell has officially frozen over! The scoop is from debian-administration.org: "The new Debian stable release, codenamed Sarge, has officially been released today. Several years of development since the last stable release, Woody, was released on the 9th of July, 2002 over a thousand developers around the world have helped make this release possible." Changes include Gnome 2.8, Firefox 1.0.4, Thunderbird 1.0.2, Apache 2.0.54 (1.3.33 is still available, too!), Postgresql 7.4.7, and more. The news hasn't hit the main Debian GNU/Linux site as of this article's posting. Congratulations to all of the Debian developers and contributors. Thanks for all your hard work and for a great distro!" Here's a link to the Debian Stable "Release" file.
Espectr0 points out an article about the release at Linux Compatible, writing "It is available on 14 (!) CD's or 2 DVD's. It includes XFree86 4.3, GNOME 2.8, KDE 3.3, Kernel 2.4.27, GCC 3.3.5, OpenOffice.org 1.1.3 and much others."
Yes but... (Score:4, Funny)
The brightside (Score:3, Informative)
Linux on one of these x86 Macs should run just as well as Linux on decent x86 chipsets.
Myself, I don't buy new Macs just to run Linux on them but I'll cheerfully deploy spare Macs as servers if they're somewhat beefy.
in other news.. DUKE NUKEM FOREVER RELEASED! (Score:5, Funny)
Mail to debian-announce; news on www.debian.org (Score:5, Informative)
News on www.debian.org [debian.org]
Congrats to the Debian project!
Re:Mail to debian-announce; news on www.debian.org (Score:2)
I was able to fix a lot of these pretty easily, but it has installed some weird things. Like xfree86-common, where did that come from? And kudzu, redhat's hardware detection tool?! I guess I'll have to go through and make sure there's nothing installed I don't want after this is done updateing
Re:Mail to debian-announce; news on www.debian.org (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Mail to debian-announce; news on www.debian.org (Score:2)
upgrade/dist-upgrade (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Mail to debian-announce; news on www.debian.org (Score:5, Informative)
Say woody had a package foo, and sarge has a package bar, which replaces foo. 'upgrade' will not install bar and remove foo, whereas 'dist-upgrade' will.
Of course, if you read the release notes [debian.org], you'd know all this...
Re:Mail to debian-announce; news on www.debian.org (Score:3, Informative)
Another important item from the release notes:
Congratulations! (Score:5, Informative)
Direct download links at http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0/ [debian.org]. Bittorrent, Jigdo or direct ISO downloads (CDs or DVDs).
MODUP! (Score:2)
Re:MODUP! (Score:4, Informative)
As it is now, I have to apologize to the mirrors I asked for, since they aren't getting any load either.
So, bring it on!
Coincidence? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Coincidence? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Coincidence? (Score:5, Informative)
In order to get off the ground quickly, xorg has been releasing versions based on xmkmf that have only really been tested on x86 and ppc. That's great, and means 90% of the people reading this can run xorg now instead of waiting six months for a non-legacy version.
Debian has been about doing things right, and waiting until they can do things right. They don't want to change to the transitional version of xorg and then change to the non-legacy version of xorg in six months. When xorg gets around to a proper build script based around configure, and starts supporting all the architectures of xfree86, then debian will switch to them.
Re:Coincidence? (Score:3, Insightful)
autoconf is a quick and dirty hack that has put decent source and library package management back decades. There's nothing "proper" about it, it's just the most popular kid in town.
Re:Coincidence? (Score:3, Insightful)
Why do you say that?
Can you please cite some examples where autoconf is lacking and provide cases where there is an existing software which addresses this shortcoming?
I know it's very easy to make a statement that something is bad, but to be truely useful information it helps to provide specifics.
Re:Coincidence? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Coincidence? (Score:3, Informative)
to make the initial config files:
http://scons.sourceforge.net/ [sourceforge.net]
Re:Coincidence? (Score:3, Insightful)
That's not true. The Debian X package maintainers ("strike force") are working on preparing a mostly-monolithic release of X.Org 6.8.2 right now [deadbeast.net]. xprint is already separately maintained and will not be supplied from the X.Org monolithic tree, and xterm may be split off too. Josh Triplett is working on packaging the libraries, but Debian's not planning on waiting for that to happen be
Hurrah! (Score:2)
Now, when can we expect Etch?
You have to wait for the signals (Score:5, Funny)
These are some of the things that happened between Debian releases:
a) The Olympic games returned to Greece.
b) The Pope died.
c) A German Pope got elected in a conclave.
d) Apple switched to Intel.
e) Watergate's Deep Throat identity was revealed.
f) The French rejected the European Constitution
g) Boston won the World Series.
So just sit, be patient and wait for the signals my son.
Re:You have to wait for the signals (Score:3, Funny)
Revelation 6:12 And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal, and, lo, there was a great earthquake; and the sun became black as sackcloth of hair, and the moon became as blood;
13 And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind.
14 And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together; and every mountain and island were moved out of their places.
15 And the kings
Way to go, guys! (Score:3, Funny)
What's next? (Score:2)
Nice (Score:2)
Whew! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I don't get it (Score:2, Informative)
"woody" also means erection in english.
At least ! (Score:2, Funny)
Excellent news! (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Excellent news! (Score:4, Interesting)
I would think that the team tried to work it out and didn't succeed. Sometimes you've just got to draw that line in the sand and say; that's it: Your bug is not important enough to hold back the whole release.
Congratulations to the Debian developers.
Yea D-Day has arrived! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Yea D-Day has arrived! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Yea D-Day has arrived! (Score:2)
Re:Guess what? It is. (Score:5, Insightful)
packages on the cds (i belive cd1 is an exception getting special criteria) are placed onto cds by popcon (an optional package that reports back what packages you have installed) output so the high cds will contain really obscure stuff
the only time i'd even consider getting or making a full cd set is if i knew i was going to be away from the net for a long time.
if you have a net connection just use either the buisnesscard (base system and full selection of kernels) the netinst (base system and stuff you need for the standard "tasks") or the full cd1. don't bother with the other cds.
What Is the World Coming To? (Score:2)
First Apple switches to Intel chips. Next, there is finally a Debian release. What's next? Microsoft giving away old versions of Office and Windows? Longhorn coming out next week? GNU Hurd becomes fully usable?
What a strange day today.
Congrats! (Score:2)
Here's looking forward to Debian 4.0!
Re:Congrats! (Score:2, Insightful)
Just wait another two years when others are running things like Fedora Core 7 and Sarge is looking like he needs a furlough.
Re:Congrats! (Score:3, Informative)
Um, nope. See this:
http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/svn/xfree86/trunk/d
debian.org now has it (Score:3, Informative)
The news release is here [debian.org].
Announcement, images, and installation manual (Score:5, Informative)
Kernel (Score:2)
I used to be a Debian head. But I've sort of lost touch with it. But this makes me want to try it again.
What kernel version? 2.4? 2.6?
Re:Kernel (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Kernel (Score:2)
Re:Kernel (Score:3, Informative)
Working download link (Score:5, Informative)
And if we run out, we will do http-redirects to our mirrors around the world, so don't be afraid to get your Sarge now!
Re:Working download link (Score:2)
" Sarge ... is dead !"
Now I won't be able to play that game anymore after I upgrade my box, it'd be too ominous.
Retraining Required (Score:2)
I could be a smart ASS and say: USB Support, Graphics (other than ASCII art), Plug And Play, 802.11b, etc, etc -- But I won't.
I have been totally impressed with a few of the Debian cousins lately (Ubuntu and Knoppix) so I have nothing but nice things to say about what Debian has given to us throughout the years.
Next monday slashdot headline (Score:2)
upgrade (Score:2)
(On my SPARC, MIPS, PA-RISC, and x86 machines) For portability and package management, nothing beats debian.
read the release notes (Score:3, Informative)
1: there is a package called doc-base that if installed will cause BIG problems unless you upgrade or remove it first.
2: aptitude is generally considered to make safer descions about upgrade order than apt-get
torrents for the isos (Score:2)
Habemus Debian! (Score:2, Interesting)
Apart from jokes, I'm curious to know if Debian still holds a share of the "market". It was a gooddistribution, but a lil too static. I honestly think they should consider doubling the release speed, or atleast provide significant updates for a release from time to time (who said "and why not call 'em Service Packs?").
I'll be a data point. (Score:2)
One of them is a test box, the other three are production servers.
=====
At home, I'm running two of them and they've been Sarge for a long time. And Ubuntu on the desktop, but that's a different story.
And the home boxes are running 2.6.11.11 (the only non-stock-Debian item on them).
The end of the world isn't near.... (Score:2, Funny)
this is great! (Score:2)
KDE 3.4 for Debian Sarge (Score:5, Informative)
For those who've been using sarge via its 'Testing' monicker, I'm guessing KDE 3.4 will hit 'etch' (the new 'Testing') in the coming weeks.
Enjoy!
Sincere... (Score:2)
This release is likely to result in a massive rise in adoption on both desktops and server rooms alike.
Take a rest now, you've more than earned it - but do keep those updates coming!
Release Number?! (Score:2)
In related news... (Score:2)
Hmmm...
If Hell has frozen over... (Score:5, Funny)
Oh man (Score:2)
Postgresql 7.4.7 (Score:2)
I mean, including Postgresql 7.4.7 as a badge of pride? Sure, its good and all, but if you have Firefox 1.0.4, then one would thing a leap to PG 8.0 would not be that big of a deal.
Re:Postgresql 7.4.7 (Score:4, Insightful)
Never use a "point zero" release on something you want to work all the time.
In this case it might be prudent to wait until 8.0 has a bit more shake-down before you convert all your databases to it.
End of days! (Score:5, Funny)
We know who deep throat is
Apple switches to X86
and Sarge was actually released.
Its armageddon. Or the Heart Of Gold just flew by.
Re:End of days! (Score:3, Funny)
My next three commands... (Score:5, Funny)
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade
apt-get install duke-nukem-forever
Yes!!!!
Re:My next three commands... (Score:3, Insightful)
unless you're running as root (bad, bad, BAD!!!!) I think you're forgetting something :)
Well, at first I saw your handle and figured you were just some Ubuntu-n00b that got told "root's bad, mmkay?" and figured it was now his right as a newly-1337 assclown to go around and scold people for this shit.
But then I looked at the number by that handle, and realized that it is far, far too low. Ubuntu wasn't even a glimmer in Debian's eye when you signed up.
So....you've got no excuse. And I must answer:
Hey p
Re:My next three commands... (Score:3, Insightful)
You're correct. I'm not an Ubuntu-n00b. My nick is from the poem "Childe Roland to the Dark Tower Came."
You are also making the assumption that I am one of those people (your exact terminology was "asspirate") that think everyone should have sudo access.
And lastly: My god man! Get a grip, it was only a joke. Develop some coping skills please.
Win32 Installer or Port? (Score:2, Funny)
Debian for Users (Score:3, Informative)
From the release announcement [debian.org]:
With the development of the new debian-installer, this release features a new, modular and sophisticated installation routine with integrated hardware detection and unattended installation capabilities.
One problem for newbies solved.
Now if they only come up with a friendly alternative to dselect that lets you mix and match packages from the unstable tree, I might start reccomending debian to newbies. Heck, I might even use it myself.
Kiss my Butt you critics (Score:2)
All you wankers out there slamming Debian for being slow to release can just push off!
I am glad that Debian is as stable as it is. Linux has certainly reached the point today where software does not have to develop at the speed of sound in order to remain stable/viable. I do expect Debian to move faster in development as that is one of their core issues in elections today, but I certainly hope it does not try to develop everything as unstable or worse.
When you consider how many people today are still us
Toy Story connection? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Toy Story connection? (Score:4, Informative)
And no [debian.org].
Re:Toy Story connection? (Score:3, Funny)
Impressive Accessability. (Score:5, Interesting)
I spent a weekend doing accessability evaluations on computers. The assignment was for Windows, but the teacher let me use Linux since that was all I had. Turns out my Debian-Linux distrobution had far more accessability features available than anything Windows had. If I had a microphone and a few cameras I could really go to town. But it is worth mentioning that the Linux community as a whole and Debian in particular has done a better than industry standard job at this>
x86_64 Support? (Score:3, Interesting)
Will x86_64 be "supported" in whatever will be the next Debian testing? And will Sarge's release mean that testing will rapidly be modernized? If so, I'm looking forward to it.
Re:x86_64 Support? (Score:5, Informative)
Yes - It's already supported in i386, with the amd64 kernel images. You can run some 64-bit stuff with amd64-libs.
No - there is no *official* support yet for a 64-bit kernel with 64-bit userland. For an unofficial (and IMO fairly stable) port that will definitely be in etch, check http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/ [debian.org] and http://amd64.debian.net/ [debian.net].
There was a huge debate about it, but leaving it out was for the greater good. Don't worry about it - it's definitely coming up if I can help it at all.
So... (Score:3, Funny)
How about... (Score:3, Insightful)
Obligatory Debian Joke (Score:5, Funny)
I only have Firefox 1.0. You know, when a Debian release has a higher browser version then you do, you know it is time to upgrade.
Re:Bill gates alert! (Score:4, Informative)
All 14 CDs include EVERY package (as in, you'll get 6 or 7 web browsers, media players, and every other obscure program that is in the repository) and source. That's probably unnecessary for 99% of people out there. Not to mention a fairly big waste of bandwidth to download.
Re:Bill gates alert! (Score:5, Informative)
Almost right, 14 CDs is just the binaries (on average, several architectures take 13, ia64 takes 15)
Source takes 15 more CDs
For a full set of CDs (that only an anal collector would actually want) for all 11 archs, and the source, you'll need 164 CDs
As you say, the netinst image [debian.org] is the way to go, unless you want to send a copy to a friend who has no internet connection.
Re:Bill gates alert! (Score:3, Informative)
bittorrent otoh gives most of the load to the downloaders.
Re:Bill gates alert! (Score:2, Insightful)
Don't you guys ever get tired of this particular bit of silliness?
So tell me, how many CDs do you need for propriatary software? A quick jog down the aisles of Best Buy infers quite a large number; and at a rather higher cost than for just the blank media.
KFG
Re:dang only 12% (Score:5, Informative)
go here [linuxisotorrent.com]
or direct links:
dvd1 [debian.org]
dvd2 [debian.org]
Re:It's mighty chilly today! (Score:2)
Re:Red tape vs common sense. Same as Netscape... (Score:2)
There're more security issues. Those, however, can (and will) be corrected after sarge's been released
(yes, it sucks, but fixing all security issues would have delayed even more the release)
Re:Torrents? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Official announcement (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Official announcement (Score:2)
You can't do that with Fedora or Suse, can you?
Re:Whiskey Tango Foxtrot (Score:2)
- Apple switch to x86
No, they've been -announced-; Neither Microsoft nor Sony have anything resembling a product ready to ship. They didn't even do the E3 demos on real hardware. Point two, Apple won't be making intel systems till 2007, when it is likely PPC systems will continue in some lines. They didn't say "in 2007 we will completely switch".
Re:This is new? (Score:2)
especailly with key system components as release gets closer debian often preffers to backport what they wan't than move to new upstream versions.
Re:This is new? (Score:2)
afaict its far far from a vanilla 4.3 though.
especailly with key system components as release gets closer debian often preffers to backport what they wan't than move to new upstream versions.
Oh great...even better. We get a hacked up nonstandard old version of the dead project. I'm not a Debian-basher (I've been running Sarge on some boxes for a while, and way back when Woody was new I ran that too) but I really, really, really wish they'd have gone with xorg instead.
Re:This is new? (Score:3, Informative)
They will, when it has more established support for the different architectures.
These things take time to do them right the first time. But possibly not as long as doing it wrong and trying to fix it a few times, but who wants to spend their entire life playing at a keyboard?
Re:apt-get update broke (Score:3, Informative)
Re:DVD Image (Score:3, Informative)
Re:any backports.org users out there going to upgr (Score:3, Informative)
Or, things may not have changed, and the backports can be used as is.
Nonetheless, if you would like to play it safe, do remove them.
Re:You WHAT??!? (Score:3, Informative)