Kubuntu, ArkLinux Announce KDE 3.4-Based Releases 176
arexx writes "Kubuntu, the new Linux flavour based on the fast-climbing Ubuntu but with a KDE desktop as standard has reached its first preview release, with the first full release due next month. ISOs and torrents are available for all major architectures from cdimage.ubuntu.com. Kubuntu is the first distribution to ship with the new KDE 3.4, released just two days ago. Existing Ubuntu users can grab KDE 3.4 with a quick and customarily painless 'sudo apt-get install kubuntu-desktop' in the nearest terminal window." Kubuntu isn't alone, though: as reader fixertechno puts it, "After 3 years of development, testing, and me waiting patiently, the first stable release of Ark Linux has been released; Bero's announcement is here. Ark Linux is a KDE based desktop version of Linux with similar goals of 'it just works' to Ubuntu Linux. If you've been waiting to try Ark Linux -- or any Linux distribution for that matter, now's the time!"
Kubuntu is a word! (Score:5, Informative)
What does kubuntu mean?
It means "towards humanity" in Bemba.
Re:Kubuntu is a word! (Score:3, Informative)
Ubuntu = humanity towards others Kubuntu = towards humanity
Re:Kubuntu is a word! (Score:1)
In the end, it's about choice anyway, right? Technical merit only goes so far...
Re:Kubuntu is a word! (Score:2, Funny)
When did I miss the boat from Slashdot land to African linguisticville (I'm guessing to what Bemba is; I'll look it up later)? You gave the definition to keep people from thinking it's a fake word then expect us to know what Bemba is.
Re:Kubuntu is a word! (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Kubuntu is a word! (Score:2, Informative)
"Bemba is a language spoken by 5 to 6 million people in Zambia, and in bordering areas of Tanzania and Congo (DRC). Bemba is one of the eight official languages of Zambia. It is the language of the Bemba people (population est. 1.7 million) and a major lingua franca across Zambia. Bemba is part of the Bantu language family (Guthrie's M.42), which consists of over 500 different languages throughout Central, Eastern, Western, and Southern Africa. Other Bantu languages include Swa
Re:Kubuntu is a word! (Score:3, Insightful)
Funny that in spanish, bemba means "big mouth" i.e a person that has very big lips, mostly african americans
Can someone help me? (Score:1, Funny)
afrolinux (Score:1, Funny)
Re:afrolinux (Score:2)
Re:afrolinux (Score:1)
I suppose, by your way of thinking, that every person of Middle Eastern decent is a terrorist; that's another generalization that makes me sick.
Ok...I'm guilty: I fed the troll. But I gue
Re:afrolinux (Score:2)
Sorry if I caused any offence myself - that was exactly the kind of thing I was trying to
Re:afrolinux (Score:1)
Re:afrolinux (Score:1)
We need more Linux distros. They're rare.
No, they are straaaaaange.
Finally (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Finally (Score:1)
One less thing for users to whine about... (Score:2, Interesting)
...and it's great (Score:2)
Re:One less thing for users to whine about... (Score:3, Informative)
ubuntu project:
* There are Canonical employees who have been hired to work on Kubuntu,
* KDE is not in universe but in main (which means it's officially supported)
* and as far as I know Mark Shuttleworth encouraged work on Kubuntu and seems to be quite happy with the current result (especially with Kubuntu's attractive konqi models).
Re:One less thing for users to whine about... (Score:2)
* You need Kubuntu to get http://www.ubuntu.com rendered standards compliant correctly (including shadows).
Re:One less thing for users to whine about... (Score:2)
http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/2 0 05 -January/019774.html
Matt Zimmerman
"This is an official Ubuntu project aimed to provide an excellent
KDE-oriented distribution based on Ubuntu."
> * There are Canonical employees who
> have been hired to work on Kubuntu,
> Wrong.
Actually Andreas Müller is working on Kubuntu (you can see this in the changelogs).
Apart from that there are two other people working as contractors for canonical who are worki
Re:One less thing for users to whine about... (Score:2)
> Ubuntu (the company behind it) putting
> money into a KDE distro.
Ask any of the top contributors of the Kubuntu project whether they are working for canonical (that's the name of the company that creates
Ubuntu) what they are doing currently during
their working hours and you'll see that you are
_plain wrong_.
> I can assure you that Kubuntu is not
> "official" in any real sense of the word.
So who believes crap claimed by an Anonymous
Coward like you? Hey,
Re:One less thing for users to whine about... (Score:1)
I don't know about XFCE, but I installed fluxbox perfectly fine on Ubuntu. It's not like they're forcing you to use gnome or kde, you can change the window manager if you want. What's the point in including all the window managers on a distro anyhow? Gnome and KDE are certainly the most popular ones.
That is the best thing about linux distros - even if you don't like what they give you, you can change it to pretty much whatever you want to, depend
to avoid misunderstood (Score:5, Informative)
Re:to avoid misunderstood (Score:3, Funny)
Re:to avoid misunderstood (Score:2, Informative)
Gubuntu is not a real word, unlike Ubuntu and Kubuntu. Ubuntu normal is based on Gnome, whereas Ubuntu-KDE or Kubuntu is based on KDE.
Re:to avoid misunderstood (Score:4, Funny)
Re:to avoid misunderstood (Score:2)
Re:to avoid misunderstood (Score:1)
This message brought to you by the ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer department. A division of the Dow Corporation.
Re:to avoid misunderstood (Score:3, Funny)
Re:to avoid misunderstood (Score:2)
Oh, and GNU/Linux is not an OS either.
Shit. I guess I haven't had an OS on my computers for the last couple of years then.
Re:to avoid misunderstood (Score:2)
Re:to avoid misunderstood (Score:1)
oh really? [kde.org]
Re:to avoid misunderstood (Score:2)
Yes... towards humanity.
Kubuntu (Score:3, Interesting)
I use Ubuntu normally, and I feel Kubuntu is very important, because it allows those who prefer KDE to use Ubuntu as well.
I'm just hoping there'll be a Xubuntu or something like it with XFCE
Re:Kubuntu (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Kubuntu (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Kubuntu (Score:2)
Re:Kubuntu (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Kubuntu (Score:2)
I bet the minute those guys start worrying about "branding," they are going to find some ways to be a lot less appealing to their current user base.
"Branding." Jeez...
That's great for (k)Ubuntu (Score:2, Informative)
Before people go like "Why doesn't Canonical make one cd with both KDE and Gnome?", let me put it this way: the same reason why they don't
Ark has a long way to go (Score:5, Insightful)
eth0 running Ethernet adapter
lo running Loopback adapter
All of which is perfectly clear to the average end user so presumably this is why there is no help button. And they seem to have a problem spelling associated, there was no z in it last time I looked.
So after a very very brief look I dont see anything particularly user friendly but I do see sloppiness.
Re:Ark has a long way to go (Score:1, Funny)
Must be the american spelling
Re:Ark has a long way to go (Score:4, Insightful)
I think you're being pretty harsh here. It's years since I looked at a network setup screen on my linux boxes; nowadays all that just seems to work immediately after installation. I suspect that the only people who use such tools are experts. As for the spelling thing, who cares? It's not as if anyone would fail to see what is meant by the word. The guy has created a whole distribution. I am personally prepared to overlook the odd spelling mistake from someone who offers me so much of his time for nothing.
Re:Ark has a long way to go (Score:5, Informative)
Oh and they should really disable kde's ipv6 support by default, it makes some web pages incredibly slow because afaik it spams your nameserver with ipv6 lookups and it can be disabled with a simple environment var (reuters.com took 40s (!!!) to load with standard kubuntu and 6-7 with the variable set). I've already written that in the channel and I'm also aware that I've tested a preview version and I am hopeful that they'll do a lot of polishing in the weeks ahead. Just wanted to mention it.
Re:Ark has a long way to go (Score:2, Informative)
In Ubuntu Hoary you can use the (GNOME-based) Ubuntu Update Manager to add new repositories, it is installed by default. (System -> Administration -> Ubuntu Update Manager, in the new dialog click 'Preferences')
You can also run 'gnome-s
Re:Ark has a long way to go (Score:5, Insightful)
While I won't argue with you about general sloppiness (I've never tried out that distro), I think it's necessary to understand that only a certain level of "clueless user friendly things" can be allowed.
The dialog you mentioned (link [arklinux.org]) labels the eth0 interface as "ethernet adapter". How much more abstraction can you expect? Should it be labeled "thingy that lets your magic number-adding box 'talk' to other magic number-adding boxes through a metal wire which fits into a rectangular-like hole in the back of both boxes"?
At some point, you have to expect the user to know what they're doing, or expect them to learn something. There is no way around that, short of having someone knowledgable literally hand-hold them through every step.
Re:Ark has a long way to go (Score:2)
(And attaching the description to the selected language is dangerous too, the phone jack comparison does work in the German speaking part of Switzerland for example)
Re:Ark has a long way to go (Score:2)
Re:Ark has a long way to go (Score:5, Informative)
As for "Ethernet adapter" etc. being too hard to understand, this is quite possibly right, but how do you want to manually configure a network without knowing what it is?
We'd be glad to hear of possible fixes for the next release.
Re:Ark has a long way to go (Score:2, Interesting)
So "eth0" is still visible, though it looks a bit easier since it's only a subtitle.
Re:Ark has a long way to go (Score:2)
How about "network card"?
If you want to make ethernet part of it, then "network card (ethernet)" is a little long but much better
Re:Ark has a long way to go (Score:1)
Re:Ark has a long way to go (Score:2)
There's a large red warning on the "System Install" button saying it will wipe all your harddisks.
You should have used the "Express Install" or "Parallel Install" options -- but we can't do more than warn you...
Re:Ark has a long way to go (Score:1)
kubuntu-default-settings (Score:5, Informative)
Re:kubuntu-default-settings (Score:1, Informative)
Oops (Score:2, Insightful)
Even worse, when Kubunto _also_ gains popularity, people will be able to help each other less. Much like the MacOS and Windows debates, groups of people will form around these and they don't usually sit next to each other, helping others with
Kubuntu Preview Screenshots (Score:2, Informative)
Dup Number 3 (Score:1)
http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/16
We should just copy and paste all of our old comments over? Why beat a dead horse?
Re:Dup Number 3 (Score:2)
Just for clarification: (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Just for clarification: (Score:1)
Re:Just for clarification: (Score:2)
Funny, yes, true, not quite. Kubuntu uses the same repositories as Ubuntu. The difference between the two is the default desktop.
As it happens, my favourite way of installing Ubuntu is to do a server install (which is a minimal install with no desktop and no X) and then apt-get the desktop of my choice if I need one on that machine. The point is that I can choose either Gnome or KDE from the official Ubuntu repositories. Of course, I'm f
Hippie Linux? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Hippie Linux? (Score:1)
Re:Hippie Linux? (Score:2)
Re:Hippie Linux? (Score:1, Funny)
Funny, I just point my friends and relatvies to #debian on just about any IRC network, and for some reason I never hear from them again.
Re:Hippie Linux? (Score:1)
Re:Hippie Linux? (Score:2)
It doesn't reek of marketing gone wrong. Its just reeks of good marketing. That is such a rare thing is the OSS world, you probably didn't recogonize it.
+1 Insightfull (Score:2)
yay more fragmentation (Score:1)
Re:yay more fragmentation (Score:2)
Ubuntu + KDE (Score:2, Insightful)
Transparency (Score:1)
Re:Transparency (Score:2, Informative)
b) Edit xorg.conf to load Composite extension (using sudo nano
c) Activate it in KDE ([x] Use transluency/shadows)
d) Logout
e) Login
Just got it last night... (Score:4, Informative)
I really like the Ubuntu distro, and I'm seriously thinking of going that route with my next upgrade. Ubuntu really shows off the nice things about Gnome. (Except for the Human theme - give me Gorilla, please).
In contrast, the Kubuntu doesn't really show off much of the latest KDE release. I booted it up, had a look, and [i]Zzzzzzz[/i]. Heck, it hasn't even got any games! I rebooted, and wiped the .iso from my disk.
I'm hoping that someone else puts out a nice Live CD distro to show KDE off, but Kubuntu isn't it.
Re:Just got it last night... (Score:2)
Rejoice Rejoice (Score:1)
LaTex (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Offtopic)
News just out .... (Score:2, Funny)
Of course there are others with up-to-date KDE (Score:2, Insightful)
And of course it supports nearly all architectures Linux does support - current: alpha, arm, mips, hppa. ia64. powerpc, powerpc64, sparc, sparc64, superh, x86 and x86-64.
What's the big deal? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:What's the big deal? (Score:2, Insightful)
You don't see the big difference with downloading one ISO, versus downloading one ISO and then download an additional desktop to replace the one you got from the ISO? I'd guess you are trolling, honestly you can't be that dense?
Re:What's the big deal? (Score:2)
Its more than just KDE. Its a set of metapackages that installs at one time every program a KDE distro is expected to have. Its a way to use the Ubuntu base without installing Gnome. Its a kickass way to fly!
I have an idea. (Score:1)
Re:I have an idea. (Score:1)
YEA! (Score:2)
Re:Oh yes (Score:2)
2) dict: dump
How about. (Score:2)
Dont like the K, dont use K-apps.
Running KDE 3.4 on Arch (Score:2)
(Arch uses "rolling" releases. It's nice, too.)
Re:Speed (Score:1)
Re:Speed (Score:2)
Re:Speed (Score:1)
Re:Ok I might regret this but,....... (Score:5, Insightful)
Gnome is a GTK based desktop environment with a focus on usability and simplicity, at times to a near detrimental level. Philosophically, it's a solid approach, but developers and users do butt heads from time to time. It's generally considered more 'Mac-like.' (More MacOS = OS 9 than X).
KDE is a QT based destkop environment which focuses primarily on flexibility and a high degree of customization. KDE focuses more on giving those that consider themselves power a larger degree of control. This degree of control does, however, lead to an increased level of complexity. Interface wise, it's the more Windows-like of the two.
And it's this point that has me slightly confused with the Kubuntu project. If you spend any time around the forums, you'll pick up that Ubuntu is built around an almost severely strict regimine of usibility. For example, in one thread I was watching, the idea of using red/green to indicate OK/Fail during boot up was shot down on the grounds that it could cause problems for people with color blindness.
While I appreciate that some people honestly prefer KDE as an environment, I don't quite see where it fits into Ubuntu's philosophy. Ubuntu is almost painfully easy to use - I have a friend who is a geek and a bit of a Macintosh zealot who's previously expressed a rather strong dislike for Linux, and even he's fallen in love with this distribution. I just don't see how it can maintain its character on KDE without pruning away many of the things the KDE advocates really like.
Re:Ok I might regret this but,....... (Score:1)
Re:Ok I might regret this but,....... (Score:1)
Legitimate question, followed up with a legitimate answer (thanks by the way)
Moron.