Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Knoppix 3.8 at CeBIT w/ Kernel 2.6, FF, and More

Posted by timothy on Wed Mar 02, 2005 03:10 AM
from the slicing-edge dept.
clsc writes "The German tech news site Heise Online reports that Knoppix 3.8 is being presented at CeBIT (Hall 9, Stand C39). Knoppix 3.8 has kernel 2.6 as default, KDE 3.3.2, OpenOffice 1.1.4, as well as... Firefox 1.0 and Thunderbird 1.0. There's also a really neato new thing involving unionfs . It seems to imply that you can change most anything on the running system, even as it is running from CD - and changes can be stored too (even on NTFS)."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • cool (Score:4, Interesting)

    by xbmodder (805757) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:12AM (#11821422)
    (http://xbmodder.us/)
    Nothing to see here... Only the best linux boot CD ever Knoppix has saved me thousands. They should win the Nobel Prize or something.
  • by qewl (671495) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:12AM (#11821429)
    Could the OS when running from CD also possibly be able to write to itself also, so long as it was a RW disk?
  • Knoppix is really good (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Dancin_Santa (265275) <DancinSanta@gmail.com> on Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:13AM (#11821431)
    (Last Journal: Friday December 24 2004, @08:49PM)
    I like to take it with me to the computer store to try out on the various laptops I am considering buying. If Knoppix doesn't have any trouble with the device drivers, I feel comfortable buying the laptop. If it runs into some issues, I can scratch that laptop off my list. And since it doesn't have any longterm effect on the existing OS, it can be loaded on with impunity.

    That's how I decided which fileservers to buy to run my distribution center.
    • Re:Knoppix is really good by carrett (Score:3) Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:16AM
    • Re:Knoppix is really good by zarkzervo (Score:3) Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:42AM
    • Re:Knoppix is really good by Mad Merlin (Score:3) Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:53AM
      • Bullshit! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday March 02 2005, @04:16AM
        • Re:Bullshit! by Bert64 (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @04:19AM
        • Re:Bullshit! by psyon1 (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @09:08AM
        • Re:Bullshit! by Sylver Dragon (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @12:26PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Knoppix is really good by Order of the Penguin (Score:1) Wednesday March 02 2005, @04:41AM
    • Re:Knoppix is really good (Score:4, Informative)

      by Tomcat666 (210775) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @05:08AM (#11821778)
      (http://blog.content.no-ip.org/)
      My current laptop (HP/Compaq NX9030) doesn't run any kernel of the current Knoppix version well - driver modprobing crashes, one of them gets the laptop to just hang, the other one won't start X automatically and most stuff doesn't seem to work right. I haven't tried out the many boot options, but that also implies that it doesn't work that well.

      However, the main OS on that laptop is Ubuntu Warty. I've never had a single problem concerning the hardware, everything works like a charm since the installation, the current Hoary LiveCD runs perfectly.

      I agree to using Knoppix to test a laptop at the store, because if it works well it'll be a great Linux machine - but you might miss out on a few deals.

      I guess the conclusion is: Try the LiveCD of the distro you want to install. If you want to install Ubuntu later, don't try Knoppix on the machine, it might make a difference.
      [ Parent ]
    • Note of caution by rwa2 (Score:3) Wednesday March 02 2005, @10:53AM
    • Re:Funny by Pantero Blanco (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @04:08AM
      • Re:Funny by Barnoid (Score:1) Wednesday March 02 2005, @05:09AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Funny by Trogre (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @04:12AM
    • Ugh: Mod Parent Up by lilmouse (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:49PM
    • 5 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • but the real question is... (Score:2, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:14AM (#11821433)
    ... if they wrote a virus for KDE, would they call it "The Klap?"
  • Reiser4? (Score:1)

    by d1v1d3byz3r0 (758848) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:17AM (#11821448)
    Any word on when Knoppix will support this lovely fs natively?
    • Re:Reiser4? by d1v1d3byz3r0 (Score:1) Wednesday March 02 2005, @11:18AM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Knoppix has come full circle (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Gopal.V (532678) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:21AM (#11821465)
    (http://t3.dotgnu.info/ | Last Journal: Monday September 26 2005, @06:32AM)
    Back when knoppix came out - it was a curiousity. Mainly because most systems needed hours of configurations to get it working "the way I want it". Small things like hooking up a "fetchmail" before "postfix flush" or putting both into the if-up scripts. Morphix was the first step towards that (eg if you want to browse securely from a cyber-cafe - without any keyloggers peeking).

    Now with lots of machines with 512 Mb and greater RAM, a LiveCD doesn't sound that bad. This unionfs thing clinches it - but the catch is still that if you change your machine, all this is lost. All that said, LiveCDs are here to stay (I think LiveDVDs might be just around the corner ..)

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:22AM (#11821468)
    Plan 9 from Lucent, the would-be successor to UNIX, has been built to support this sort of thing from the ground up.

    It's a shame that novel OS's like Plan 9 are largely ignored, only for some of their features to be introduced later into mainstream OS's as "new" ideas.
    • Re:Plan 9 has had this feature for a long time by Mad Merlin (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:39AM
    • by idlake (850372) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:55AM (#11821581)
      Plan 9 has a lot of good ideas in it, and I hope that many more of them make it into Linux.

      However, unionfs did not originate with Plan 9--other UNIX systems have had it, too. I don't think it even came from Bell Labs.

      It's a shame that novel OS's like Plan 9 are largely ignored, only for some of their features to be introduced later into mainstream OS's as "new" ideas.

      Plan 9 was/is a research system; that's it's function in life. As long as the developers of other systems don't falsely claim that they invented it, and as long as they reference the inventors in publications, it's OK. Some large computer manufacturers are not quite honest about this sort of thing, though, and claim that they are constantly "innovating" when in reality, they are just copying.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Plan 9 has had this feature for a long time by JoshG (Score:1) Wednesday March 02 2005, @04:10AM
    • Re:Plan 9 has had this feature for a long time by c0l0 (Score:1) Wednesday March 02 2005, @05:38AM
    • Re:Plan 9 has had this feature for a long time by gl4ss (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @07:14AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • 3.6 - 3.7 - 3.8 (Score:1)

    by MrEcho.net (632313) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:22AM (#11821469)
    Well I hope this ver doesnt crap out like the 3.6 ver did on my laptop. But the 3.6 ver worked at my school as per the 3.7 doesnt. Weird networking issue.
  • coLinux and live CDs (Score:5, Interesting)

    I was talking to Jeff Waugh from Ubuntu the other week (*cough* blatant name dropping *cough*) who suggested that the next Ubuntu Live CD might have coLinux on it. You'll be able to plug the CD into any Windows XP machine and get Ubuntu running in a window (that you can fullscreen if you like). He said he'd prefer not to use the Cygwin X server, so I think he's going to put up a bounty for a frame buffer -> DirectX driver for coLinux.

    No need to reboot to demo linux, that could well be sweet.

    • Re:coLinux and live CDs by WetCat (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:50AM
    • Re:coLinux and live CDs by glenkim (Score:1) Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:50AM
    • Re:coLinux and live CDs by cduffy (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @04:45AM
    • Re:coLinux and live CDs (Score:4, Informative)

      by DrXym (126579) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @06:02AM (#11821943)
      While it would be cool to see Colinux working, I seriously doubt it will allow networking. Getting colinux to network is a massive pain involving installing Win32-Tap, reboots, messing around with bridges / NAT, fiddling Linux-side to make it work and generally ripping your hair out. This is definitely one area that requires improvement - both for Colinux and Microsoft who should ship some kind of TAP device by default.

      Once it does work, it works like a charm, but it took me a couple of hours to figure it to work with my setup. I started with a pre3.0 Debian root_fs I grabbed from the net. Once I got the networking going, I changed sources.list and upgraded to Debian 'sarge' dist. Now I have a lovely GNOME 2.8 desktop all running under XP at (my guess) 80-90% of native speed. I've sucessfully gotten both VNC and NX to run under it though performance through NX is more sluggish than I expected.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:coLinux and live CDs by Anonymous Coward (Score:3) Wednesday March 02 2005, @07:06AM
    • Re:coLinux and live CDs by tkw954 (Score:1) Wednesday March 02 2005, @08:25AM
    • Suggestion by JediTrainer (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @08:57AM
    • Re:coLinux and live CDs by bcmm (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @02:32PM
  • Knoppix can REALLY impress (Score:5, Interesting)

    by xiando (770382) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:27AM (#11821484)
    (http://en.xiando.org/ | Last Journal: Wednesday May 18 2005, @07:44AM)
    There is one way of really supremely impressing people using Knoppix some people are not aware of: IF you have a gigabyte of RAM or more then you can actually load the whole Knoppix CD into memory so you can use the CD drive for all other kinds of things... But this has one obvious bi-effect that I have realized impresses so heavily: When programs are started from RAM, they obviously load faster than from a hard drive. Knoppix loaded into memory is the fastest Linux distribution I have seen so far, almost all programs start instantly. So if you have a machine with lots of ram and want to seriously impress: This is the way to do it! This is kind of cheating as no normal Linux system can perform like this, but it is ideal for demonstrating Linux. On a personal note, I would seriously be happy if something like this could be done with a normal distribution: Say if you have 3 GB RAM, then why not load everything into a portion of it at boot and run programs off memory .. even if you have Linux installed on your hard drive? Obviously this is 'waste of RAM', but hey, if you have lots of money and therefore RAM, why not??
    • Re:Knoppix can REALLY impress (Score:5, Informative)

      by qewl (671495) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:36AM (#11821513)
      Feather is a great distribution for doing this. It only needs 128 to 256 MB to have everything loaded and still plenty of processing ram. Great for somewhat older computers and has all the hardware recognition of Knoppix 3.6
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Knoppix can REALLY impress by Mad Merlin (Score:1) Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:37AM
    • Re:Knoppix can REALLY impress by Bert64 (Score:3) Wednesday March 02 2005, @04:23AM
    • Re:Knoppix can REALLY impress (Score:5, Interesting)

      by ahfoo (223186) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @04:44AM (#11821723)
      (Last Journal: Friday April 04 2003, @12:49AM)
      Well, Gigs of RAM isn't really all that cheap, so I think using Damn Small Linux to do the same thing is more impressive for most people because you can use what is available in the here and now. You can easily load DSL into RAM with 256Megs and sometimes it works with 128Megs, but you won't be able to add many other packages once you get it online.
      However, and I'm currently typing on just such a system, it's not as fast as you'd hope. The reason is that LiveCDs use compression on the filesystems so you have that overhead preventing things from being as fast as it could be. But certainly as big RAM goes mainstream there is no doubt in my mind that the idea of running the whole system from RAM is inevitable. Like I say, I'm already there albeit using a compressed filesystem.
      As for this unionfs thing. Is that completely unrelated to klik? That's a pretty cool development on Knoppix that has come a long way in a very short time. You can already install most Debian packages on Knopppix without a hard drive install using Klik. And even better, you can save the packages to hard drive or removeable media. So, you don't lose them at all when you change to another machine.
      This totally rocks. I'm not sure if it's related to the unionfs thing, but it certainly deserves mention because it is hot shit.
      [ Parent ]
      • RAM by frog51 (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @09:31AM
    • Re:Knoppix can REALLY impress by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday March 02 2005, @05:42AM
    • Re:Knoppix can REALLY impress by Tim C (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @06:46AM
    • Re:Knoppix can REALLY impress by cerberusss (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @07:18AM
    • Re:Knoppix can REALLY impress by mrogers (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @07:27AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • My luck... (Score:4, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:33AM (#11821504)
    I have finished downloading Knoppix 3.6 with my modem yesterday...
    • Re:My luck... by qewl (Score:1) Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:48AM
      • Re:My luck... by dolmen.fr (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @08:14AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:My luck... by NoMercy (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @08:21AM
      • Re:My luck... by Hank the Lion (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @02:03PM
      • Re:My luck... by bcmm (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @02:59PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • confederatefs (Score:5, Funny)

    by dotslashdot (694478) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:36AM (#11821514)
    Is there a confederatefs located at the bottom of this stack that uses ioslaves to pick fields from a database?
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Writing to NTFS... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Mad Merlin (837387) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:48AM (#11821560)
    (http://otc.dyndns.org/game/)
    As the summary hints at writing to NTFS, will this version of Knoppix use Captive NTFS [jankratochvil.net] in some manner, or is it just going to write to a loopback file to get around the problems with using the native Linux driver for writing to NTFS?
  • Another day... (Score:1)

    by stuffisgood (666330) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:56AM (#11821585)
    another livecd....Now what am I supposed to do with the ten Ubuntu two-disc sets I got in the mail today.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by OlivierB (709839) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @04:03AM (#11821597)
    The one last thing that could even more favorise live CD adoptions could be online settings and file storage.
    Sure you can carry around a USB key and store your settings there. But imagine being able to boot a machine anywhere and beinga ble to retrieve your field from something ala Yahoo briefcase.

    Solutions exist out there; think GMailFS
    If they would include this on the KNOPPIX CD with automount and all..
    I am drooling just thinking about the possibilities!

  • Like slax? (Score:2)

    by m50d (797211) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @04:09AM (#11821614)
    (http://www.sdonag.plus.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday June 07 2006, @04:05AM)
    Is this unionfs like the ovlfs that has been used in SLAX for ages? And if so why not just port ovlfs to kernel 2.6?
    • Re:Like slax? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday March 02 2005, @05:50AM
    • Re:Like slax? by AlXtreme (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @10:44AM
      • Re:Like slax? by xEndymionx (Score:1) Wednesday March 02 2005, @12:15PM
  • UnionFS (Score:1)

    by HogynCymraeg (624823) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @04:15AM (#11821627)
    Sounds a little similar to intermezzo
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Not On BitTorrent yet... (Score:3, Informative)

    by dohboy (449807) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @04:44AM (#11821721)
    ...but here's where to grab it once it is released:

    http://torrent.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/ [uni-kl.de]

  • by otis wildflower (4889) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @05:16AM (#11821806)
    (English xlation [google.com] ;)
  • Firefox (Score:2)

    by bcmm (768152) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @06:44AM (#11822058)
    Firefox seems the obvious choice for a live CD. I was shocked that it still contained Mozilla Suite, given its size compared to Fx ("ff" is not the correct abbreviation for Firefox, according to the Mozilla foundation)

    What are they going to do with all that free space I wonder?

    P.S. run "bb" from the console in Knoppix. Best waste of space ever.
    • Re:Firefox by nutshell42 (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @08:48AM
      • Re:Firefox by bcmm (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @11:38AM
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 02 2005, @06:56AM (#11822081)
    You should see how easy it was to install this damn thing - you can either use "sudo knoppix-installer" for a hand held new install or do this to literally get the live cd working on the PC with a persistent home directory -

    * Partition the harddisk to make room for knoppix:
    o ext2 partition /dev/hda1 used to boot the kernel with lilo (30 Meg)
    o ext2 partition /dev/hda2 for the knoppix image (I used 10000 Meg, but 800 Meg should be enough)
    o swap partition /dev/hda3 (I used 1024 Meg)
    o ext2 partition /dev/hda4 for the persistent home (rest of drive
    * Boot the knoppix cd with the cheatcode "tohd=/dev/hda2". This will copy the knoppix image to disk
    * Reboot the knoppix cd with the cheatcode "fromhd=/dev/hda2" and check if it runs without the cd.
    * Make the persistent homedir via the knoppix menu (penguin icon->configuration->make persistent dir, use entire /dev/hda4 and format)
    * Do not save your KNOPPIX configuration via the menu, all changes to the environment will be saved automatically because of the persistent home.
    * Copy the files from /boot to /mnt/hda1. Also copy the file "/mnt/cdrom/boot/isolinux/minirt24.gz" from the cd to /mnt/hda1.

    Note, you will need to mount hda1 and make it read/write. The copying can only be done with sudo, thence the command to copy is "sudo cp /boot/* /mnt/hda1". Or, you can use su. I just found sudo was fine.

    * Copy /etc/lilo.conf to /mnt/hda1 and make the following boot entries (do not forget to uncomment the line with "prompt", or else the lilo boot menu will not appear): (vi /mnt/hda1/lilo.conf)

    Note, learn vi commands first

    image=/mnt/hda1/vmlinuz
    initrd=/mnt/hda1/minirt 24.gz
    append="fromhd=/dev/hda2 home=/dev/hda4 lang=us myconfig=/mnt/hda4"
    root=/dev/hda2
    label=Knoppix
    read-write

    * Mount the /mnt/hda1 partition temporary as /boot so lilo writes its map-file to the right place (sudo mount /dev/hda1 /boot)
    * Let lilo write the boot loader to the master boot record (sudo lilo -C /mnt/hda1/lilo.conf)
    * Remove the knoppix cd-rom and reboot.

    That's it. you can use lilo.conf to set up another OS that exists, like Windows 98. I chose to dedicate the disk, seems easier. 10 minutes and I'm working with a fully functional Knoppix bootable hdd based PC.

    Now THAT fuckign rocks hard.
  • by spacepimp (664856) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @07:01AM (#11822099)
    I've used knoppix for many varied task cleaning windows for clients, f-prot has cleaned virii, i've gotten data recovered. The one thing that keeps this from being able to rescue, windows, is a spyware/malware cleaner. has anyone seen a project like this to for a live disc? i understand windoze blows etc. but these are client machines, i just support them.
  • unionfs workalike on BSD / Mac OS X (Score:3, Informative)

    by headLITE (171240) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @07:08AM (#11822114)
    (http://notabilis.org/)
    Just for your information, Mac OS X and other BSDs can mount anything over another directory without hiding its own content. For example, on Mac OS X you'd use the -o union mount option to merge two different filesystems.
  • Remastered with e17 (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 02 2005, @07:53AM (#11822270)
    What might really be interesting, (perhaps a niche project) would be to remaster knoppix with enlightenment e17. I'd love to be able to show off all that eyecandy.

    I use KDE and Gnome on a regular basis but showing people KDE is getting fairly bland. Yes, I know there are two schools of thought on this eyecandy vs. clean/simple/functional, but knoppix *is* for showing off to a certain extent.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by Ratbert42 (452340) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @08:08AM (#11822328)
    Did they get rid of that annoying audio file? It turns what's otherwise a class act live cd into something that reminds everyone of trekkies living in their parent's basement.
  • Horrible fonts. (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 02 2005, @08:38AM (#11822469)
    This is not a troll! I installed 3.7 and the fonts were awful! Isn't there a way to have them look pretty out of the gate? It was very noticeable under the Spe python editor and mozilla. Any suggestions for fixing would be greatly appreciated. Thx Ovapositor (too hurrried to log in)
  • Security risks (Score:2)

    by Florian (2471) <cantsin@zedat.fu-berlin.de> on Wednesday March 02 2005, @08:48AM (#11822538)
    (http://cramer.plaintext.cc/)
    I hope Knoppix developers implement file storage of a modified installation in a sensible way, i.e. without automatic detection and usage of the user file on system startup, and possibly with user/password fingerprinting. Otherwise, Windows malware could be written that creates manipulated Knoppix system files on hard disks and takes over once somebody boots a Knoppix CD on the machine.
  • by beyonddeath (592751) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @08:53AM (#11822571)
    But it doesnt do everything, ie I needed to resize my root partition (LVM2) and apparantly knoppix doesnt have lvm support. and the fedora rescue cd doesnt load lvm, so im sol cause its an EXT3 partition that cant be resized online.
  • WindowMaker? (Score:1)

    by hawkwind (24733) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @09:30AM (#11822880)
    Have they put wmaker back in?

    A lightweight windowmanager seems necessary to me for boot-cd linux.
  • Knoppix (Score:1)

    by NAACPsupporter (863927) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @09:43AM (#11822959)
    Is there a place that can show you how to install Knoppix on a hard drive. I find Knoppix to be the only Linux distribution that works with all my hardware. I would like to install it on my hard drive and not run it from the CD rom. I am mostly a windows person, so I need a step by step guide. I intend to install Knoppix at the community boys and girls club so that they can use the internet on older computers. Thanks!
    • Step-by-step by FreeLinux (Score:2) Wednesday March 02 2005, @10:45AM
    • Re:Knoppix by NAACPsupporter (Score:1) Thursday March 03 2005, @11:31AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • by mnmn (145599) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @09:53AM (#11823068)
    (http://ghazan.hazara.org/)
    Captive ntfs has been a pain, and 90% of my knoppix's usage comes from trying to fix some file on some NTFS partition. Even upto 3.7, it was crashing for me.

    Good NTFS writes would be the biggest news for me in 3.8. Not much else room for improvement elsewhere
  • by Wapiti-eater (759089) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @10:35AM (#11823555)
    on when 3.8 may become publicly available?? I see nothing on the knopper.net site about 3.8.

    Speculating and debating all these neato features, politics and wish lists is just mental masturbation until folks can actualy get their grubby mits on it and can abuse it, break it and other fun things.

    KNOPPIX 3.8 relaesed for public download HERE!

    Now, that'd be a headline worth clicking on. Who's crystal ball has been recently calibrated? Give us the skinny!!

    (HINT: It'd be stuff that matters)
  • Remastering your own custom KNOPPIX (Score:4, Interesting)

    by rwa2 (4391) * on Wednesday March 02 2005, @10:44AM (#11823670)
    (http://hairball.bumba.net/~rwa2/ | Last Journal: Wednesday December 20 2006, @10:25AM)
    Remastering [knoppix.net] your own KNOPPIX is easy and it works.

    I built a custom system maintenance image for work in a couple of hours. Among the changes:

    • Stripped out games, i18n (takes up a lot of space)
    • installed some extra utilities (gkrellm, iftop, etc.)
    • captive-ntfs ntoskrnl and ntfs.sys files already stored in /var/lib/captive
    • installed DOSemu to run Ghost and DriveImage (previous backup standards). This allows me to do backups and restores over the network, or from a USB2.0 / firewire drive (that isn't always detected properly under real DOS). I can even backup and restore to SATA or SCSI/RAID arrays that aren't supported under DOS.
      Unfortunately, DOSemu stripped out wholedisk access, so I have to restore the MBR with dd . :( Anyone know how to hack wholedisk access back into the dosemu source?
    • Custom scripts to automate connecting to our fileservers and detecting/backing up drives with partimage, dd, etc.
    • And of course, custom backgrounds :P

    Pretty damn useful... it's the only system maintenance CD that boots on all of our hardware.

    If only grub could be bootstrapped from CD, we would also use it to boot into existing systems and it'd be perfect!

  • by bitspotter (455598) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @12:48PM (#11825102)
    Using unionfs with a hard disk over the read-only CD filesystem, I'm thinking it would be possible to initiate an "install" process in the background, utilizing idle time, that wouldn't interfere with regular usage of the system.

    The process would go something like this: Boot the system from the CD, check out the functionality. If you like it, click a program that says "Install". It asks you to select the harddrive where you you'd like to store the system (perhaps even to an ntfs partition?). The next time your system idles, the screen saver comes on. Then, in the background, the installer begins copying files from the read-only cd image to the hd overlay layer on the fly. *None of the applications even notice*, and it can be interrupted at anytime if you come back to use your system before the install is complete. Once it's done, it dings, and ejects the CD.

    With Linux, I've enjoyed instlling apps without rebooting, but I'm now looking forward to installing an OPERATING SYSTEM without rebooting.

    That is pretty sexy.

  • hohoho (Score:2)

    by bitspotter (455598) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @12:52PM (#11825155)
    • hohoho by bitspotter (Score:3) Wednesday March 02 2005, @12:55PM
  • by schweini (607711) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @01:07PM (#11825323)
    I still consider remastering livecds a drag - but i've been playing around with emulators like qemu lately, and was wondering:
    does anyone know of a distro i can boot e.g. using qemu (knoppix works fine), configure it inside the emulatorcontainer, and then simply burn the "image-file" to a cd? this would make remastering really easy and powerful, IMHO....
  • by I kan Spl (614759) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:25AM (#11821480)
    (http://unusedusername.com/)
    Actually I think that would be a good idea. I have a bunch of boxes at home, is there any distro out there that would boot form a cd and turn them into a cluster for some instant number crunching?
    [ Parent ]
  • by d1v1d3byz3r0 (758848) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @03:38AM (#11821523)
    Gentoo [gentoo.org]. You can configure to your humble heart's content.
    [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Hear hear.

    Try Slackware. You'll love it. And by default you'll have to type "startx" to get any sort of GUI action going on.
    [ Parent ]
  • by Gil-galad55 (707960) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @06:54AM (#11822078)
    I don't really have a problem with colloquialisms. I think they give otherwise uppity writing a little spirit--or at least a country twang! And, it's not as if slashdot is a literary journal. I do draw the line at the incessant spelling errors, and I cry havoc when I see fragments, run-ons, and sentences that clearly have their roots in a bad Turing test. It does seem that slashdot is pretty rife with these errors nowadays, and while it ain't Beowulf, it should at least give professionalism a passing glance.
    [ Parent ]
  • switches to graphical mode only once, when it starts X (unlike fedora core)

    Fedora has the graphical boot by default (it looks a lot nicer in my opinion) but you can turn it off easily.

    Open /etc/inittab and change
    id:5:initdefault:
    to
    id:3:initdefault:
    . No more graphical boot.

    You could also uninstall the rpm, I think it is called 'rhgb'.
    [ Parent ]
  • I'm looking for a linux distribution which shows the technical boot process [...]

    Just press escape during the boot.
    [ Parent ]
  • by gl4ss (559668) on Wednesday March 02 2005, @08:27AM (#11822415)
    (http://--/ | Last Journal: Monday December 09 2002, @05:12PM)
    any.

    if you care about enough to see the boot process you should know how to find out how to enable it.

    if you're just looking for shit to fly past the screen.. echo some neat looking stuff at the end of the boot process.
    [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • 17 replies beneath your current threshold.