Linux On Your Tablet PC 199
tyman writes "Michael Rolig has created a Debian-based linux package for your Tablet PC. The support for various tablet features is limited by the features on the tablet Rolig owns, such as the "half-working" pen button features. One important missing feature is the screen-swivel buttons common with most tablets. However this is a good start for the development of linux for Tablet PCs."
Open-source tablets... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Open-source tablets... (Score:3, Funny)
if it moves, try loading linux on it.
So far I've had luck loading linux on an XBOX, PS2, and GCN, so with a good
Re:Open-source tablets... (Score:2)
The Linux Philosophy:
if it moves, try loading linux on it.
Close. Just leave off the "if it moves" part...
Re:Open-source tablets... (Score:3, Funny)
It's almost as if no matter what Microsoft comes out with Linux is managed to be placed onto it. Great huh?
Almost? Fuck! What did we miss?Re:Open-source tablets... (Score:2)
Unfortunately that won't happen in the very near future though, unless some rapid development takes place.
Fortunately, "rapid development" is pretty much par for the Linux course.
element Computer (Score:4, Informative)
Re:element Computer (Score:3, Informative)
That "tablet" has a resistive touch screen.
Its not a tablet if it's touch sensitive. The whole idea is to be able to rest your palm on the display while writing.
Re:element Computer (Score:3, Interesting)
mostly there (Score:3, Informative)
I agree UXGA or higher resolution would be nice, but
Re:element Computer (Score:2)
Re:element Computer (Score:2)
The distrobution doesn't come with kernel sources
Isn't that a GPL violation?
Not as long as they make the sources available; i.e. if they are on an FTP site someplace, or can be apt-got, or (I think) if you can email and ask for them, this is kosher.
That said, it's bunk to not install the kernel source tree by default; if you need obscure modules or something you'll need to go hunting.
In other news... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:In other news... (Score:1)
Re:In other news... (Score:2)
Re:In other news... (Score:2)
It can't steer, break...
First of all, good thing it doesn't break. Hopefully the brakes work ok though. Also, about the steering....that's really pretty much the user's responsibility.
Re:In other news... (Score:2)
A modern linux distro has 3D support, programs to use the "internets", listen to radio, watch TV, download photos from your cam, watch DVDs.
Wait, Windows XP don't have a program to see TV or download photos from your camera, its all 3rd party tools. Oops.
Re:In other news... (Score:2)
Re:In other news... (Score:2, Informative)
Damn, I quit too soon. I forgot to mention all the cool things my laptop can do that it wouldn't be able to if it ran windows:
1)I can update all my software with one command. Windows Update will only handle OS components.
2)I can install nearly any piece of software from one unified interface. In Windows, I need to go hunting for the software and install it whatever way the developer chose.
3)I can personally control my processor speed and the criteria for speedstepping. Windows will not allow this.
4)I ca
Re:In other news... (Score:2)
Re:In other news... (Score:2)
Sorry, I have no idea how to make your computer run like it did yesterday.
Bwahahahah! That's classic. And yeah, that's one that escaped the list..."I can be reasonably sure that when I wake up tomorrow, my computer will not have totally fucked up for no readily-apparent or adequately explicable reason."
Re:In other news... (Score:2)
Right, and the reason you exclude 3rd party software for Windows and not your Linux distro is...?
Because:
1)I don't have to buy and pay for it seperately from my system software.
2)There isn't really a line between 1st and 3rd party software in Linux anyway (i.e. bash is not written by the same folks who write the kernel).
3)I consider the "party" writing my software to be the OSS community, which pretty much writes all of it.
4)I get to install all the "3rd party" software from my package manager, which
Re:In other news... (Score:3, Funny)
As you might have learned from Monty Python, simple denial will not suffice for an argument.
Right. But he wasn't making an argument. He was replying to me, and I had already made a logical and forthright one. He was just telling me to calm down because this guy was an idiot. I had already explained why he was an idiot.
Anyway, it doesn't much matter now. The post we're all talking about is labelled "funny," which I find reasonable. When I posted my reply, it wasn't even to that post, but one that complai
Re:In other news... (Score:2)
Re:In other news... (Score:2)
Oh ya... and get a life!! Holy crap, did you seriously sit there and think up that huge list just to justify yourself to an AC?? Go drink something with alcohol in it for Christ's sake.
Damn. Busted. I've just been sitting here dicking around all day. Oh well. But at least I was drinking alcohol the whole time.
Re:In other news... (Score:2)
Oh, is that the criterion for Flamebait? Hi, Flamebait.
A better criterion, given the word itself, is something that provokes another to flame. In which case, I certainly can't deny your accuracy, insofar as you flamed me.
This is what's called a Straw Man. Since you couldn't address the AC's true point - that Linux lacks basic functionality on a Tablet PC - you reconstituted it in a form you could spew your canned arguments against.
Sorry, but you must have mixed up which post was the parent of my own.
Re:In other news... (Score:2)
A better criterion, given the word itself,
I hope you\'re from Betelgeuse and not just dim.
Huh? Don't get me wrong, I recognize that I set that criteria, sort of. On the other hand, I didn't invalidate the second one I set just then; it's broader. I'm not sure what your point is, but it's not real well thought out.
And on this hilarity of your armchair character analysis, I really enjoy the irony. "Gee, you shouldn't even be replying to some AC like this." Don't forget who's the coward.
Re:In other news... (Score:2)
You must not have ever used Windows 1.0. Windows were not even allowed to overlap.
Out of Date? (Score:1)
Re:Out of Date? (Score:2, Insightful)
And I don't know if Windows users should be lured into Linux on the TabletPC. Unless you want to scare the off, that is. ATM you'd just lose what's making the Tablet special (handwritting, OneNote, and so on), and if that was your first meeting with Linux, you'd never come back.
But... (Score:4, Funny)
Excellent! (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Excellent! (Score:2)
because you can configure it to be much lighter?
did you read what you were replying to? "winxp crawls..." well, maybe you think that crawling is "something pretty good".
Re:Excellent! (Score:3, Funny)
*I can't see why you'd want to run Linux on a Tablet PC *
because you can configure it to be much lighter?
Bullshit. I just installed debian on my TC1000, and it weighed exactly the same as it did when I had XP on it.
Re:Excellent! (Score:2)
just buying faster things is nice and all, but a lot of what foss thrives on is just re-using old hw.
quite probably he just wants lighter web browsing and such.
Re:Excellent! (Score:3, Interesting)
I would, however, move to using Linux on the device as soon as a Linux package that is mature for the Tablet PC became available. Why? Well, that's entirely politics and not technical. And that's the only 'good' reason, because I'm sure even a 'mature' package would have flaws -- but it would be a b
Re:Excellent! (Score:2)
Perhaps it's better to just bite the bullet and accept that Microsoft have come up with something pretty good.
With an attitude like that, we'd never have Linux in the first place. You're proposing a chicken-egg problem: "don't bother with Linux, because there's no support...since there's nobody bothering with Linux, why support it?" It's probably not entirely ready on tablets yet....but it wasn't entirely ready for servers in 1992 either. Those of us who aren't ready to accept the mediocre results handed
And? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Your sig (Score:2)
Clinton was impeached for perjury, not for lying per se. Typical liberal spin.
Typically conservative ignorance. The federal perjury statute defines the felony as lying about a "material point" which is elsewhere defined as a point having an impact on the matter under scrutiny in the case. Considering that the question of whether Clinton got a BJ had absolutely nothing to do with any of the charges he was discussing with that grand jury that day, it was as immaterial as a question about what he had for br
Negative comments (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm cynical (Score:5, Insightful)
Even some of the better distros at hardware detection like SuSE, Mandrake and Yellowdog have community forums filled with regulars who love using the OS, yet still don't have everything working. USB2 controllers only working at 1.0 speeds, ethernet not working, many with no sound and most without accelerated graphics.
I love my linux computer, and I left Windows years ago... but when are we going to FINISH some of this stuff we started? I feel like I'm living in a world of workarounds.
Re:I'm cynical (Score:2)
Re:I'm cynical (Score:2)
it's all native driver support (except the nVidia module).
The NVidia driver is native.
Also, while I run Gentoo most of the time also, hardware detection does not "generally blow." It is in fact much more sophisticated than, say, the hardware detection in WindowsXP.
Re:I'm cynical (Score:2)
Re:I'm cynical (Score:2)
Re:I'm cynical (Score:2)
"We" aren't going to finish it. I think the way to go is have it preinstalled, like Linspire [linspire.com] does, because most hardware has a perfectly working driver, it's just the pain of getting it all working, editing /etc/modules.conf, /etc/rc.d/rc.local et cetera. In the future, I don't expect to have time for this anymore, so I'll probably give my cash to a hardware vendor which has a deal with Linspire or similar distributions.
I agree (but feel you greatly exagerate one point) (Score:2)
Well, if Y differs from X i think its great(a little innovation have never hurt anybody). But, in about 8/10 cases it doesn't. It's most often X with a different UI, adding to the already bloated package foundries of our distro's of choice.
Even some of the better distros at hardware detection like SuSE, Mandrake and Yellowdog have community forums filled with regulars who
Re:I'm cynical (Score:2)
Even some of the better distros at hardware detection like SuSE, Mandrake and Yellowdog have community forums filled with regulars who love using the OS, yet still don't have everything working.
You haven't ever been to the Windows forums? And seen the thousands of people having problems getting things working on Windows?
Seriously, I'm tired of people bitching about how "sometimes things just don't work." I haven't found a system yet that didn't give somebody a pain in his ass. But these days, well over
Re:I'm cynical (Score:2)
My computer is fairly advanced (SATA hard disks, DVD burning, firewire etc.), and because I had the forethought to check that things are going to work, runs perfectly.
Come on - you wouldn't buy a BMW part for a Ford, so don't buy Windows only hardware to run run Linux.
Re:I'm cynical (Score:2)
Re:I'm cynical (Score:2)
Just because people love to use Linux doesn't mean they're working on device drivers. Chances are they're spending their time posting to forums complaining about USB2, playing games and looking at porn. I don't think many people write drivers for free, which is pretty much what you need, unless you apply lots of pressure to manufacturers.
Re:I'm cynical (Score:2)
the middleware of autoconfig and setup routines never seems to work properly.
Dammit! This is the part that just makes me crazy! "never" seems to work? Are you fucking kidding? Don't you see?.....like 98% of the time, it just works right. Out of the box. I'm counting the people who didn't check to see if it was muted as working right. But seriously, the amount of time that sound doesn't work on hardware that isn't completely exotic is crazy low. In my experience, it's lower than Windows by a long shot...W
Re:I'm disappointed (Score:2)
More often, I've found myself upset that the hardware manufacturers fail to support linux...
Wireless support is a good example of this.
No, wireless support is nearly the only remaining example of this. The wifi manufacturers are stuck in a tight spot, because FCC regulations (and perhaps their analogue in other countries) prohibit them from allowing users access to the parts of the software that control the frequencies and power output of the radio. So open sourcing the drivers is a legal impossibility
Re:I'm disappointed (Score:2)
So you're saying that Intel [intel.com] and Atheros [atheros.com] are breaking the law?
Let's try not to lose sight of the fact that Linux has many times the hardware support of Windows.
Linux has many times the architecture support, not "hardware support". Sure, just about anything with a floating point unit (and even a lot without) can be made to run Linux. But that's not what we're talking about. I can't think of a single hardware device that will work with Linux but not
Re:I'm disappointed (Score:2)
So you're saying that Intel and Atheros are breaking the law?
No, I'm saying that open sourcing the drivers would be illegal. I also said that Atheros found ways to work around this problem. They used a binary, closed source hardware abstraction layer to conceal the parts of the code which legally could not be exposed. I don't know Intel's story, but either they have something in hardware that limits the device to FCC spec, or a HAL, or they are violating FCC regulations. I'd bet on the first two possibil
Re:I'm disappointed (Score:2)
A couple of years ago, my employers bought a new XP box to replace their failing Win98 machine. They were also forced to replace a perfectly good inkjet printer, because there were no XP drivers available for it.
I don't recall the model - I think it was a Lexmark - but I do remember that there was a Linux driver available for it at the time. This isn't an isolated case; there's a whole commu
Re:I'm disappointed (Score:2)
As far as the Atheros/Broadcom situation goes, cant just one host it in a country...
Yes. That's a pretty good idea. The only trouble is that you'd still have to hack the hardware without help from the hardware manufacturer. Even if it wouldn't be illegal for the hardware manufacturer to participate (and I'd expect it would) it would certainly piss the FCC off something fierce, and that's not something a big hardware company is going to do just to make a few geeks really impressed.
Failing that, is there
Why own a Tablet PC? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Why own a Tablet PC? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why own a Tablet PC? (Score:2)
Re:Why own a Tablet PC? (Score:2)
Because Tablets make good E-books, for one (Score:2, Interesting)
Most of the time I use it as a Notebook. However, it es excellent for reading and marking up PDF files, or for doing art and drawing. Basically, the Tablet mode is a much better form factor than a Notebook for these activities.
The question should be, why NOT own a Tablet PC?
Some anti-Tablet comments remind me of those IBM-PC users back in the 80's, who used to make fun of Apple and their mice......who needs
Re:Why own a Tablet PC? (Score:5, Informative)
On the hardware side, there's the darn trade-off between the portability/mobility (weight, size) and the usefulness as a digitial ink writing pad. While I highly appreciate the mobility of my 12" convertible tablet pc, I stopped quite early using it as a writing pad for non-trivial diagrams and longer texts because 12" is too small and you even lose another 2"-3" because of the casing and tool bars.
On the software side, there's a lack of applications and those applications that should be predestined for the tablet pc have serious disadvantages.
As I've pointed out in the paragraph about hardware, IMO the tablet pc isn't ready or suitable for authoring longer texts or designs. I use my convertible in the notebook mode for these tasks.
The tablet pc in slate mode is still perfect for taking notes, sketching some graphs and the like. For a student like me, this would be perfect, if a) all material would be available in a digitized form (lecture material, scripts, textbooks,...) and b) if the document viewer application had great digital ink support.
Re:Why own a Tablet PC? (Score:2)
I have an NEC litepad pad which is just over a cm thick and about the size of a magazine. I use it almost exclusively for web browsing.
Tablets are also great for note taking and brain storming. Imagine being able to take handwritten notes and diagrams where all the text is searchable (even if it has been written on an angle).
IMHO, the form factor and amazing handwriting re
Re:Why own a Tablet PC? (Score:2)
You can hold it with one hand and control it via stylus with the other. (I.e. you can use it standing up.) Doesn't sound like much, but man, it is nice to use while on the couch. No more "Ack! IT's about to fall off!" moments.
It's great if ya need a PC to wander around with you. It's also great if you need to draw. I use my M200 for both and I'm quite happy with it. If those aren't appealing to you, though, then don
Rule #1 about Linux on Tablet PC (Score:2, Funny)
Tablet PCs aren't as new as you might think.... (Score:4, Informative)
Other than the pen device and the attached button, it's essentially just another laptop, so the standard tricks can work.
Don't forget to check:
http://www.linuxslate.org/ [linuxslate.org]
http://www.linux-on-laptops.com/ [linux-on-laptops.com]
Re:Tablet PCs aren't as new as you might think.... (Score:2)
Oh, that's so great. (Score:5, Insightful)
First is the lack of hardware support. If you happen to have a TC1000 then this guy has the drivers for you. If you happen to have an M200 (like I do), then he doesn't have the drivers for you.
Second is the lack of handwriting recognition. That's essential for using a tablet in, you know, tablet mode. Without it, even choosing to visit www.slashdot.com is a chore, and you can forget about word processing or email in the comfortable tablet form factor while riding the bus.
Third is the lack of applications. There are a few well chosen applications that support handwriting as a first class input mechanism. When scratching and scribbling on things it is comforting to have circles and lines, and even my messy handwriting, be the same as I put them in.
It would be nice to have Linux working well on my tablet, but the tablet PC is a new hardware and software platform. Microsoft doesn't have a great and polished interface for it yet, only one that is good enough. Still, every little bit of that new platform that Microsoft and others provide for Windows XP on a tablet is a little bit that Linux doesn't have yet at all.
Re:Oh, that's so great. (Score:2)
It shouldn't be necessary for applications to explicitly support handwriting. The applications should support XIM, and that should be sufficient for a handwriting input method [debian.org.hk] to be used system wide.
Rotating screen is HARD (Score:2, Interesting)
2. Not all video adapter drivers support rotation.
3. Of some that support some do it on software and it makes screen handling extremely slow.
4. Framebuffer drivers exist only for couple adapters.
5. Vesafb works, 1280x1024 screen rotated CCW takes approx. 2-3 seconds to redraw completely on slower cards. (Like my i865G) on the super fast cards it's only like 1s.
6. With all solutions you have to restart atm the X when you want to rotate your screen.
There are
Re:Rotating screen is HARD (Score:2)
zaurus (Score:5, Informative)
Looking at this project, some areas that are incomplete include the swivel sensor and other doodads that have already been tackled by OZ. Seems like it would make sense to build on the OpenZaurus codebase, rather than start from scratch, especially for Debian.
-J
in addition to OZ (Score:3, Informative)
I have one of these as well, and would like to add a blurb about pdaXrom [pdaxrom.org], which is an alternate ROM that uses X instead of a modified Qtopia.
While it currently doesn't do anything for handwriting recognition (why bother with a full and excellent keyboard), and the UI works pretty well for touch input. Not only that, while your buddies are using slimmed-down feature-light software, you'll have a full word processor (abiword), spreadsheet (gnumeric), email program (pick one), browser (firefox, konqueror),
PenOS? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:PenOS? (Score:2)
See Jerry Kaplan's StartUp for the backstory.
William
(who is writing this out on a Fujitsu Stylistic)
Re:PenOS? (Score:2)
Almost working. (Score:4, Informative)
Linux on the Tablet (Score:2, Informative)
I've been discussing all sorts of linux on tablet issues on my site:
http://groundstate.ca/tablet [groundstate.ca]
Includes available software, wireless roaming, Mandrakelinux, and specifically, the TC1000 and TC1100.
Linux on Fujitsu Stylistics LTs (Score:2)
If you like to contribute, feel free:
http://www.neurath.org
Frank
Debian on my Acer TM C100 - works fine (Score:4, Interesting)
hardware it has PXE boot (so you can get it started without needing to go through USB floppy or USB cd-rom) wireless and 10/100 hardwire, and firewire and usb-2, i810 ac97 sound, IR port, a tracker-pad (with all 6 buttons recognised by linux) and the full screen is ESD-touch-sensitive.
all other laptops you are bloody stupid to have bought, if you ask me: buy one of these and strap some bricks on the back if it makes you feel any better.
me? i would be better off if i stuck with a 2.4 kernel or a debian/stable system because there are binary drivers available for the Wacom touchscreen chipset.
the incompatibility between the drivers and X is due to the drivers (available on sf.net) being compiled for only 19200 and 38400 baud, but the wacom device's baud rate defaults to 115200.
so i had to patch and recompile the X driver to cope with 115200 baud. i only managed this once - and then upgraded and lost it!
the only other thing is that ACPI is not properly recognised (every single linux kernel presently available goes "invalid ACPI checksum, squawk!")
as a consequence of this, you must select which of the networking devices you wish to see on your PCI bus at boot time - the RTL 8139, or the extra Texas Instruments 3.3V PCMCIA slot with a built-in orinico-compatible 802.11b wireless device.
if you press the "flip" button, forget it - reboot time to get networking back.
what else... oh yes. after a year of virtually constant use, i've cracked the screen "side" catches (but they still work) the "middle" catch broke last week (but the one on the other side for locking the screen into tablet mode is still there) i've worn writing off of S, C and the left shift and ctrl, scored _lines_ in the left shift key with my nails, but other than that, it's still serviceable, and i love it.
oh. and the hard drive has about one head-crash per three months and wipes bits of my ext3 partitions out...
Re:Debian on my Acer TM C100 - works fine (Score:2)
I hope you aren't serious... What's your definition of "works fine", again?
Re:Debian on my Acer TM C100 - works fine (Score:2)
my requirements for laptops are quite specific: small and light equals best, in my book, with price coming next on the priority list, and right at the bottom of the list comes processor speed.
my definition of "works fine" is that after a year of absolutely hammering the machine almost all day almost every day it's still useable, and in reasonable enough condition to make me not twitch
Toshiba Portege 3500 works great with linux... (Score:4, Interesting)
Is it totally worthless ? I don't think so. (Score:4, Informative)
A good example is my BluePAD Tablet PC. It totally lacks linux support and I was unable to find any info whatsoever about the touchpad interface.
After playing with it for a while, I finally managed to do something useful with it and posted a small tarball on my site that would get it to boot into X:
http://julian.coccia.com/article-71.html [coccia.com]
Someone said it is stupid to install linux on a Tablet PC that already comes with an OS preinstalled. Well, I strongly disagree here.
My Tablet PC came with CE.NET preinstalled. Everything worked, yes, but I couldn't install any software on it unless I wanted to write it myself which required me to sign up to M$ and get a demo copy of their CE.NET compiler (or whatever they call it). Therefore, the Tablet PC as it was as USELESS for me.
Now I can boot into X and do what I wanted to do with it
More info on how I installed linux on it: http://julian.coccia.com/article-40.html [coccia.com]
Re:Is it totally worthless ? I don't think so. (Score:3, Informative)
Tablet PCs have specific specifications such as active digitizers that only respond to pens (important for handwriting) and they need to run Windows XP Tablet PC edition for the amazing handwriting recognition.
It's understandable that people get tablet pcs confused cause there's quite a market out there for slate style devices now.
The blueslate isn't any more a tablet pc than a palm pilot is a pocket pc. They
Re:Is it totally worthless ? I don't think so. (Score:2)
Are you saying a Tablet PC is only a tablet PC if it runs XP ? It sounds funny.
Yes. I'm not saying other devices aren't "tablets-type devices" but they aren't "tablet pcs" which are usually totally different beasts and give a totally different user experience.
Like I said, it would be like comparing Pocket PCs with Palm devices. They are similar but totally different when you use them.
I would suggest that you go to a store and test out a real tablet pc to see what they can really do.
Re:Is it totally worthless ? I don't think so. (Score:2)
I would recommend (Score:3, Informative)
siemens simpad (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Ruin perfectly good hardware with crapy linux G (Score:2)
Re:Ruin perfectly good hardware with crapy linux G (Score:3, Informative)
Putting Linux on your tablet is a bit like putting Linux on your powerbook....or putting Linux on your iPaq
Right. It's also a lot like putting it on your x86 laptop. Or your XBox, HDTV, DVR, PS2, or any of the other thousands of products that linux runs on. It's probably the most flexible general purpose OS ever. Which means folks inclined to tinker can put it wherever the hell they feel like. Get over it.
(For the record, I do own an iPaq, and it does run Linux. I'm quite pleased with it.)
Re:Ruin perfectly good hardware with crapy linux G (Score:2)
If you plan to use Linux exclusively on a Tablet PC, you are wasting a lot of money.
Re:Ruin perfectly good hardware with crapy linux G (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:wtf? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:wtf? (Score:2)
Huh?
Despite the admonition to not quarrel with a fool (folks might not be able to tell who's who), I'll bite.
why would you want to run linux when xp tablet edition is pretty awesome and well-tested and integrated with other existing microsoft products?
First, I think your unsupported claims of XP's "awesome" and "well-tested" nature are quite amusing. I'll leave "awesome" alone because of its absolutely subjective nature, but I'll still note that I disagree, and feel instead that it "sucks." About "well
Re:wtf? (Score:2)
Re:wtf? (Score:2)
Re:M200 Toshiba (Score:2, Informative)
Re:M200 Toshiba (Score:2)
This was basically stated by another user, so sorry if I'm being redundant here. However, it's important to note that most TabletPCs (at least the ones that don't use actual touch screens) use Wacom digitizers. Whatever OS you install, if you can get a Wacom driver, you should be okay.
Figured I'd mention that in c
Re:M200 Toshiba (Score:2)