Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Moving To Linux

Posted by timothy on Tue Aug 03, 2004 03:20 PM
from the kiss-it-goodbye dept.
norburym writes "This is an interesting format for a techie book geared at non-techies: instead of providing a detailed installation and configuration instruction set for a particular full Linux distribution, Marcel Gagne has included a Knoppix CD with his book, Moving to Linux: Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goodbye! The author's intention is clearly to give the reader a no-risk introduction to Linux. As such, this book is not intended for power users or professionals; there are other books more suited for this market. At the same time, this book is not really for the Dummies style audience, either. It's for the Windows user who is looking to migrate to the Linux platform and find solutions to his or her day to day computing needs." Read on for the rest of norburym's review.

Since the book comes with Knoppix and the author's purpose is to introduce the Linux desktop immediately, the first few chapters of this book only briefly describe what Linux versions are available, how to get a copy and how to install your chosen distro. Gagne gives some example installation choices with Mandrake, Redhat and SuSE. The next two chapters deal with using and customizing the author's desktop environment of choice (KDE) and exploring with Konquerer.

Chapter 7 provides a "release-agnostic" approach to package installation with examples and screen shots from Kpackage, RPM installs via shell and building from source. Most readers will become quite familiar with Chapter 8: Working with Devices, despite the author's exclamation that "Device support under Linux is excellent. No, really." Printing looms large in this chapter and there's some good advice to be had here for the newbie. The next several chapters tackle getting connected to the Internet, email and using Konquerer and Mozilla. In short, mainstream user necessities. Mandrake, RedHat, SuSE, and Ximian are all represented in the chapter on system updates along with a pitch to get involved in the Linux community (this is a good thing).

The make-or-break chapters for those readers requiring office productivity solutions come near the half point of the book. Gagne gives an overview of OpenOffice.org's suite of MS Office counterparts. These are really meant as introductory lessons on migrating from the more familiar, more ubiquitous MS suite of applications and not intended as an in-depth look at OpenOffice.org. Here is where the user will judge whether Linux is a viable alternative to Windows. Productivity is essential. Can you create a document that can be shared in a Windows dominant world? Can you do it without struggling to learn new rules and exceptions to the rules? Gagne makes a strong pitch for ease of use in the Linux world.

The final chapters on multimedia and games round out the topics that every semi-literate computer user has on their "must know how to" list. Under multimedia, KsCD, XMMS and Noatun are covered, including visualization plugins and skins. K3b, Grip and MPlayer are also described. Favorite Linux games are represented: KSirtet, KAsteroids, Frozen-Bubble, KBattleship, KPatience, KPoker ... well, you get the idea!

Care has been taken in laying out the book; from the beautiful typography, the boxed asides with Quick Tips, Shell Outs and Notes to the Resources list at the end of each chapter. The book is easy to read and the author has a crisp conversational style of writing devoid of distracting anecdotes or sophomoric humor (chapter subheadings aside!). Gagne succeeds in providing a guidebook to Linux that should enable the average Windows users to make a smooth transition to a Linux distro of their choice. At the very least, Gagne gives the nervous Windows-to-Linux wannabe an excellent bootable Knoppix CD to test drive while following along in the book. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend this book to someone who is looking to give Linux a spin but is afraid to commit their working PC to Linux entirely. This book and the accompanying CD will ease the way toward independence from Windows.


You can purchase Moving to Linux: Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goodbye! from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews. To see your own review here, carefully read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • For Those That Don't Know (Score:5, Interesting)

    by OctaneZ (73357) <ben-slashdot2@um ... rg minus painter> on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:21PM (#9871547)
    (Last Journal: Tuesday September 11, @01:41PM)
    Marcel Gagne writes an amusing and informative monthly Column [marcelgagne.com] for Linux Journal [linuxjournal.com] called Cooking with Linux [marcelgagne.com].
  • Huh (Score:4, Insightful)

    by thephotoman (791574) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:22PM (#9871555)
    (Last Journal: Tuesday May 10 2005, @07:05AM)
    I do kind of like these books that help ordinary people go to Linux. I know one of them even worked for me, and I'm to the point that I'm ready to ditch Windows on my desktop and go with just Linux. Furthermore, the LiveCD distro included is a good idea, just in case the person doesn't like what they see.
    • Re:Huh (Score:4, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:32PM (#9871668)
      Good by BSOD, Hello segfault!
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:54PM
      • Re:Huh by Merdalors (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @06:06PM
      • Re:Huh by Chess_the_cat (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @06:46PM
        • Re:Huh by adrizk (Score:2) Wednesday August 04 2004, @07:10AM
    • Re:Huh by maja33 (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:55PM
    • The wave of the (Linux) future... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by biendamon (723952) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:00PM (#9871963)
      These book/CD combos are a godsend to those of us trying to convince friends and family to switch (so we no longer have to clean viruses, trojans, and spyware from their computers every few weeks).

      I'm easing my family into it right now. The trick is to start by introducing the easiest open-source applications that are available on both platforms. Pull the old "Here, I'll 'upgrade' your browser for you, and you won't get pop-ups anymore" trick and get them used to Firefox. Follow it up with Thunderbird and OpenOffice, and they'll gradually start wondering why they put up with all the problems they used to have in the first place.

      That's when you whip out the book and the Knoppix CD, and introduce them to the same applications they're used to on a different operating system. Get them curious, get them interested, and then they'll start doing the work for you.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Huh by fluffybacon (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:41PM
    • Re:Huh by fitten (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @05:11PM
  • Irony (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:23PM (#9871562)
    a desktop OS should be easy enough to use that the idea of buying a book on how to run it would be redundant. One can dream.
    • Microsoft's not better (Score:4, Insightful)

      by RWerp (798951) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:29PM (#9871625)
      Compare it with the number of 'Windows XP for dummies' copies sold.

      Will this get my karma raised?
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Irony (Score:5, Insightful)

      by fantastic max (690355) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:29PM (#9871627)
      Yet there are plenty of books out there that teaches one how to use MacOS and Windows. So by that logic, all desktop OSes are difficult to use. And these days, any time someone writes a book about how to use these, they instantly call it "Hacking Windows/OSX".
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Irony (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Cromac (610264) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:35PM (#9871690)
        Yet there are plenty of books out there that teaches one how to use MacOS and Windows. So by that logic, all desktop OSes are difficult to use.

        They are all difficult to use. Have you ever participated in any usability studies with people who have no computer experience? There is nothing intuititive about using a computer. There are things that seem intutitive after years of using a computer, but to someone with no background they're all overly difficult to use.

        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Irony by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:03PM
        • Re:Irony by Lxy (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:08PM
        • Re:Irony by pherthyl (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:22PM
          • Re:Irony (Score:4, Insightful)

            by Brandybuck (704397) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @09:40PM (#9875084)
            (http://www.usermode.org/ | Last Journal: Tuesday April 17 2007, @09:13PM)
            So computers are not simple or intuitive to use. Big deal, nothing is.

            Unfortunately, the vast majority of tech reporters not only believe that it's possible, but that it actually exists in whatever OS they're a shill for. To them, Linux/BSD/Unix will NEVER be ready for the desktop, because they're measuring it against an impossible yardstick.
            [ Parent ]
          • Re:Irony by Eternauta3k (Score:1) Wednesday August 04 2004, @06:26PM
        • Re:Irony - but it can be done by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:33PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Irony by MP3Chuck (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:54PM
        • Re:Irony by Simon Woodman (Score:2) Wednesday August 04 2004, @04:36AM
      • Re:Irony (Score:4, Informative)

        by Otter (3800) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:57PM (#9871928)
        (Last Journal: Wednesday November 21, @10:04AM)
        Yet there are plenty of books out there that teaches one how to use MacOS and Windows.

        Actually, if you go by "the fewer books, the easier the OS" logic, I'd say MacOS is the hands-down winner. With a larger desktop share than Linux, there are far more Linux books that Mac books in any general or technical bookstore that I've ever seen. Back in the days of Classic MacOS, you'd be hard pressed to find even a single Mac book in a lot of stores.

        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Irony by el-spectre (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:45PM
          • Re:Irony by Otter (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @05:26PM
            • Re:Irony by el-spectre (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @06:53PM
        • Re:Irony by kaleco (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @05:45PM
    • windows isn't easy, per se... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:31PM
    • Re:Irony by thephotoman (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:31PM
    • Re:Irony by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:32PM
      • Re:Irony by severoon (Score:3) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:54PM
        • Re:Irony by SoSueMe (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:25PM
          • Re:Irony by severoon (Score:2) Wednesday August 04 2004, @05:36AM
        • Re:Irony by biendamon (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @05:00PM
          • Re:Irony by RidiculousPie (Score:1) Wednesday August 04 2004, @03:22AM
        • Re:Irony by killjoe (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @10:54PM
          • Re:Irony by severoon (Score:2) Wednesday August 04 2004, @05:34AM
            • Re:Irony by killjoe (Score:2) Wednesday August 04 2004, @12:02PM
              • Re:Irony by severoon (Score:2) Thursday August 05 2004, @03:48PM
              • Re:Irony by killjoe (Score:2) Friday August 06 2004, @10:58AM
    • Re:Irony by nz_mincemeat (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:34PM
      • Re:Irony by Lodragandraoidh (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:30PM
    • Re:Irony (Score:5, Funny)

      by Short Circuit (52384) <mikemol@gmail.com> on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:34PM (#9871682)
      (http://shortcircuit.us/ | Last Journal: Sunday October 14, @02:01AM)
      It's been said before, but the only intuitive interface is the nipple [greenend.org.uk].
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Irony by AKAImBatman (Score:3) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:59PM
    • Re:Irony by johnny_sas (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:37PM
    • Re:Irony by AmaDaden (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:45PM
      • Re:Irony (Score:5, Funny)

        by SoSueMe (263478) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:33PM (#9872340)
        (http://austinfire.ca/)
        I just gave my dog a linux machine. He lifted his leg at it the same as he did with XP.

        Of course his idea of an "intuitive" interface is a bit more simple than mine.
        His goes like this: "If you can't eat it or screw it, piss on it."
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Irony by mailtomomo (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:52PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Irony by ciderbob (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:11PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Hardware Issues (Score:4, Insightful)

    by jacksonai (604950) <taladon@gmail.com> on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:24PM (#9871573)
    One of the main issues with Linux Live CD's is the fact that it is rare for a live cd to properly initialize ALL the hardware on the computer. (i.e. sound card and wireless 802.11) Until something happens to allow universal driver support, live cd's will leave a bad taste in people's mouths who use obscure / cheap hardware (most windows users)
    • Re:Hardware Issues (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Vancorps (746090) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:31PM (#9871658)
      Might add the fact that kernel 2.6 is incompatible with a lot of older hardware. My servers are still running 2.4 because my raid controller can't initialize with it. Works great for newer equipment but its a safe bet that if anyone were ready to switch they would be running older hardware. This used to be a strength of the linux platform. Not sure when, how, or why it changed.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Hardware Issues by SkiddyRowe (Score:3) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:33PM
    • Re:Hardware Issues (Score:5, Interesting)

      by CarrionBird (589738) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:34PM (#9871688)
      (Last Journal: Wednesday December 01 2004, @10:25AM)
      They really should have a section up front that tells people, "Ok, heres what hardware is supported out of the box. Everything else is likely to be a headache".

      Don't lead people on to think that they can just throw any old hardware at it and expect it to work.

      MS and Apple have deals where HW makers get to put the logos on thier products if they can show compatibilty. It would be nice if some distro companies would step up and do something similar.

      (even better if they tested for general Linux compatibilty, not just thier distrubiton)

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Hardware Issues by magefile (Score:3) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:08PM
      • Not useful by NineNine (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @05:32PM
        • Re:Not useful by The Vulture (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @05:55PM
        • Re:Not useful by Brandybuck (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @09:57PM
        • Re:Not useful by CarrionBird (Score:2) Wednesday August 04 2004, @08:25AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Hardware Issues by Chanc_Gorkon (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:36PM
    • Re:Hardware Issues by coolsva (Score:3) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:39PM
    • Re:Hardware Issues by Hatta (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:41PM
    • Re:Hardware Issues by cavemanf16 (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:46PM
    • Re:Hardware Issues by Homology (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:02PM
    • Re:Hardware Issues by Jeff DeMaagd (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:13PM
    • SuSE's live disc by castrox (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:16PM
    • Re:Hardware Issues by maidhc (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:20PM
    • Re:Hardware Issues by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:58PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:28PM (#9871613)
    Are you suggesting Linux users are migratory?

    / Don't get me started on the flight speed of African swallows.
  • Confusing title... (Score:5, Funny)

    by avalys (221114) * on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:28PM (#9871619)
    The easily-missed colon in the title, combined with the fact that there have been a lot of stories about companies migrating to Linux lately, made me read the title as:

    Linux Moving to Linux

    That definitely elicited a double-take.
  • Kiss the BSoD goodbye? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:29PM (#9871631)
    Could have been a 1 page book.

    Get off pre Windows 2000.
    Update drivers.

  • As great as Knoppix is, I stuck it on my wife's machine when she was having some hardware problems (as a stop gap until I could do a rebuild). All she could do was bitch about how slow everything loaded from CD, such as Open Office. Combine this with the change in gui and CD distros are not always the best way to intro new users.
  • Interesting (Score:5, Insightful)

    by The Bungi (221687) <thebungi@gmail.com> on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:34PM (#9871687)
    (http://members.cox.net/bungi/)
    Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goodbye!

    Way to go, this is a fantastic argument to use to get people to switch. When was the last time I saw one of those... hmmm. Let's see. Since 1998 when I switched to NT4 and later through W2K, XP and 2003 (yes, as a desktop) on literally dozens of machines, I've seen four blue screens, and they were all on the same W2K box (the one I use for gaming and crap). Two were caused by stupid Creative drivers, and I forget what caused the other two.

    Yeah, four blue screens in (I guess) hundreds of thousands of hours of operation on multiple machines is a definite reason to switch to Linux. I'm sold.

  • Not so... (Score:3, Informative)

    by hypermike (680396) <hypermike.gmail@com> on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:35PM (#9871699)
    One of the main issues with Linux Live CD's is the fact that it is rare for a live cd to properly initialize ALL the hardware on the computer. (i.e. sound card and wireless 802.11) Until something happens to allow universal driver support, live cd's will leave a bad taste in people's mouths who use obscure / cheap hardware (most windows users)

    I ran Knoppix 3.3 and the newest 3.4 on Dells cheapest laptop. Inspiron 1100, Everything detected perfectly and runs great. Even the Netgear wireless NIC. Knoppix is good at even the cheapest hardware. As long as its common, thats what they shoot for. Ease of use.

    Heres a good site for Linux on the Inspiron 1100.

    http://www.geocities.com/randomnumbergenerator2001 / [geocities.com]

    • Re:Not so... by PalmerEldritch42 (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:24PM
  • Incorrect price on BN (Score:4, Funny)

    by GillBates0 (664202) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:36PM (#9871706)
    (http://slashdot.org/~GillBates0 | Last Journal: Tuesday July 10, @04:36PM)
    Paperback, August 2003
    List Price: $34.99
    Our Price: $27.99 (Save 20%)
    Barnes & Noble Member Price: $26.59

    It should be $733.99 (Save -95.23%).

    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Please Help (Score:2, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:38PM (#9871727)
    I've installed Linux but I can't find solitaire. Does this mean I have to reinstall Windows?
    • Re:Please Help by pandrijeczko (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:44PM
    • Re:Please Help by sloanster (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:52PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Please Help by PeterPumpkin (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:20PM
      • Re:Please Help by PeterPumpkin (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:24PM
    • Re:Please Help by mikael (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @05:20PM
  • Kiss the BSOD? (Score:5, Funny)

    by callipygian-showsyst (631222) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:41PM (#9871760)
    (http://www.robert.to/)
    Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goodbye!

    And replace it with a Kernel Panic!

  • Linux (Score:5, Insightful)

    by the_Bionic_lemming (446569) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:46PM (#9871809)
    Lately I've been thinking about moving to linux to check it out - Gaming is still important to me , but I'm sorta interested to see how linux has evolved in the past 5 years since I last tried linux - and burned up a monitor since I didn't know what I was doing.

    With that said - the big thing that puts me off from trying Linux (apart from switiching gears) is this "BSOD" reference from folks that are trying to tell me that their software is better.

    Before you mod this "flamebait" just listen for a moment. I've been working as a programmer, and have used win 2k pro extensively over the past five years on at least 7 different machines. The only time I got a BSOD was on a Western Digital Hard Drive failure.

    When I see someone tell me that their software will free me from the "BSOD" - I can't help thinking that they haven't seen or used win2k - or haven't configured their installations properly - and they are trying to tell me "Linux is Better" based off of 95/98/ME or poor computing practices.

    And while that certainly is most likely the case that Linux is Better- I'd like an honest comparison on how it fares against 2kpro? Honestly - if you want to convert folks over to Linux - Do it positively - Tell me what's good about Linux - Don't tell me what's bad with windows - I know what's bad with windows and a Linux guy telling me what's bad with windows will get an eyeroll from me, and will outright be dismissed from conversation if they mistate or are erroneous on the latest platform.

    Campaigns based on Negativity are self defeating. They won't sway the extremes, but they will force the fence sitters away from moving to the negative side. I want to know what I will gain. I want to know why it's right for me. Tell me the good parts and how and why they are so good.

    But above all, Please - Drop the "BSOD" it left with Windows ME.

    by the way - Microsoft does drop the ball - Windows CE

    Win CE

    WinCE - lol
    • Re:Linux by Neil Blender (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:51PM
      • Re:Linux by Neil Blender (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:02PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Linux by pandrijeczko (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:55PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Linux by prostoalex (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:56PM
    • Re:Linux by hawkeyeMI (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:56PM
      • Re:Bad IT! by hawkeyeMI (Score:2) Wednesday August 04 2004, @12:01PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Linux (Score:5, Interesting)

      by jimicus (737525) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:05PM (#9872020)
      (http://www.whitepost.org.uk/)
      I'm probably not the best person to tell you, since the thing which caused me to drop Windows was a job in which I administered 120 9x machines. But, here goes...

      Speaking as a techie, the thing which is good about Linux is that if something goes wrong (and it will - those who tell you it won't are either lying or inexperienced) the error messages tend to be more useful, as do the error logs.

      You can usually communicate directly with someone fairly closely involved in developing whatever software/driver is broken. You're not stuck with Microsoft's "support", and I find that the signal/noise ratio in mailing lists tends to be significantly higher. Basically, you don't generally have a bunch of MCSE monkeys telling you what the problem is and getting it spectacularly (and obviously) wrong.

      Programs tend to be relatively small and self-contained - an obscure bug with a particular package in userland won't usually affect much else in the system (unlike Internet Explorer).

      The developers are generally far more open & honest about bugs. You're more likely to hear "Oh, that's new. Looks like a bug..." from an open source developer than from a Microsoftie.

      I can sleep at night knowing that not a single byte of software on my computer is pirated.

      It may be that none of these are convincing reasons to switch. Fine, then don't. The best operating system is the one that does what you want it to. (Hear that sound? That's my karma evaporating)

      It may be that you find these things sufficiently interesting to take another look. Great. If there's a Linux user group in your area, get to know them. They will be able to help if (when) you encounter trouble, and you can return the favour by helping the next new person to send an email saying "Hi..."
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Linux by no-arg constructor (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:10PM
    • Re:Linux by cyclocommuter (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:51PM
    • Re:Linux by archen (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:57PM
    • Re:Linux by Beryllium Sphere(tm) (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @07:55PM
    • Re:Linux by Brandybuck (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @09:32PM
    • Re:BSODs on modern Windows by Duhavid (Score:1) Tuesday August 03 2004, @06:04PM
    • Re:BSODs on modern Windows by freeweed (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @07:23PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 4 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • saw it (Score:2, Informative)

    by KB1GHC (800065) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:46PM (#9871810)
    I went to barnes and noble to look at some books about linux, I always have problems with installing programs and stuff, and i read quite a few "newbie" books about linux, but i keep running in to problems

    it seems like a good book, but for a non-geek, try linux for non-geeks
  • by AgntOrnge (718563) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:50PM (#9871840)
    And say hello to segmentation faults and core dumps! woohoo!!
  • Not Debian (Score:3, Interesting)

    Funny about how the guy speaks only about RPM-based distros, and then his demo is based on Debian!
  • Captive NTFS and Wireless (Score:5, Insightful)

    by the_riaa (669835) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:53PM (#9871874)
    (http://www.retarsia.com/)
    Until they start packing better NTFS support (Captive NTFS is a pain in the ass, and still doesn't work for me most of the time) along with 802.11b/g/a card support in Knoppix, it's hard for a lot of current Windows users [XP users, mainly] to switch over. I'd love to try out more in Knoppix as I love that you can pop in a live CD, learn some Linux, and if needed, reboot and go back to Windows - and when I sufficiently knew enough about what I was doing in Linux, only then would I make the permanent switch.

    One thing about all these articles is that they expect users to quit Windows cold-turkey and immediately jump head first into Linux. But from what I've seen personally, that's not necessarily the best approach. Those that I've seen try making the hard switch install their distribution of choice, then after a few hours of trying to regain the functionality of their last OS [figuring out what does what, where it is, etc] they get frustrated with Linux and wonder what made them give up their previous OS when it worked "just fine". I like the gradual approach that Knoppix and other live CD-based distros can afford. You can pop it in, screw with it for a while, learn some, then pop it out and go back to your old OS if you get frustrated or tired. I commend Gagne for using Knoppix as the teaching tool of his book.
  • Kiss the blue screen goodbye? (Score:2, Redundant)

    by Judg3 (88435) <jeremy&pavleck,com> on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:54PM (#9871889)
    (http://www.pavleck.com/ | Last Journal: Friday November 18 2005, @01:16PM)
    What is this blue screen you speak of? I vaguely remember it from my Win 9x and NT 4 days, but alas I have yet to see one in a long time. In fact the last blue screen I had was in 2001, the heat sink fell off of my CPU and Windows bluescreened at me..

    Oh wait, I remember a second one - last year, when the hard drive died, I got the page fault blue screen.

    Other then that, I haven't seen one in a looong time - and I use Windows a lot at home and work at a company with almost 1000 Windows servers. But hey, stereotypes are hard to lose I suppose.
  • AT LAST - A NON-UBERGEEK approach! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:54PM (#9871891)
    I read his book. I am a newbie (sorry: 'noobie' is it?). I like his approach. He is about the only Linux user who doesn't scoff at new users. What irritates me in the Linux "community" is that each time a new user asks a question, it is clearly lablelled ad a *stupid* question. He, we're not all uber-geeks. I just want the thing to work.

    I also think that the haughty attitude portrayed by some Linux users actually puts people off - and gives them reason to stick with Microsoft.

  • Lotus Notes client for Linux? (Score:2, Informative)

    by obdulio (410122) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:01PM (#9871971)
    (http://www.manya.org/)
    The only reason I have to use Windows at work is that all our mail/contacts/schedule is in Lotus Notes and I could not find a client for Linux (weird if you think on IBM's commitment to Linux).

    Using wine is so painfully slow that is not a solution.

  • Is good. But.... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by smchris (464899) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:06PM (#9872027)
    Just put a senior citizen who only wanted web and email on linux. Tried a Knoppix hard drive install to experiment, but:

    1. Modem driver didn't claim to work with Debian, and, although the install script was "Debian-aware", it didn't.
    2. How do I get _user_ level icons for mounting and unmounting removable media that a computer newbie can understand? Seemed like "auto" was broken after a hard drive install?

    Fedora Core. Simple process. She's happy.

    My conclusion was that Knoppix isn't quite there for the clueless home user's desktop.

    But Knoppix is a clever insert for a beginner's book and, looking through a book store thinking about what my new user might understand, I can see that such a book is very needed.

  • BSOD's? (Score:1)

    by Man in Spandex (775950) <prsn.kevNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Tuesday August 03 2004, @05:10PM (#9872676)
    Marcel Gagne has included a Knoppix CD with his book, Moving to Linux: Kiss the
    Blue Screen of Death Goodbye!

    Marcel Gagne has fun bashing the past of Microsoft. Now I'm not saying Windows is stable but 2K/XP rarely gives anything remotely close to a BSOD and knowing how many are using XP over 9X, can't see how that statement is relevant.
  • And shake hands with your new friend, kernel panic.

    Who is panic, and what is he doing in my computer?

  • User friendliness? (Score:1)

    by evslin (612024) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @05:22PM (#9872771)
    Is Linux really there yet in terms of accessibility? Last thing I used was Redhat 9, but that was a few months ago so .. I guess what I'm really interested to see is what kind of hell a Linux tech support call from a 70 year old woman who just wants to e-mail her kids would be like - especially if it's going to involve going to the command line. And before anyone replies and says that tech support calls for a Linux system wouldn't be all that common because the system itself is so stable and secure ... trust me, if anyone's going to find a way to break a computer, it's going to be the people who could care less about the OS as long as their e-mail is working. But you all already know that. ;) I'm not saying Windows is necessarily better than Linux, I think both have their strengths and I'm perfectly comfortable working in either environment. But from what I've seen so far I don't know if even a Linux For Dummies-style book is going to help get around the fact that the operating system itself still has awhile to go before it attains the user-friendliness of Windows.
  • by bitserf (756357) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @05:24PM (#9872789)
    um, yeah, so i've had windows XP crash exactly 0 times in 3 years. the blue screen of death is so yesterday!
  • They might as well, every body else is....
  • Who reads anything? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Trailwalker (648636) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @05:46PM (#9873093)
    There are a great many non-readers who have gone from TV to PC. When they screw up their windows install, I just give them a Knoppix disk and tell them to click yes to everything. The only hard part is explaining how to change the boot sequence to boot from their CD player first.

    "What's a bios, is it dangerous?"

    I do not mean illiterates, but people whose lives were formed around staring at a tube. To these people, a PC is just another tube with more variety.
  • by TheNetAvenger (624455) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @06:22PM (#9873463)
    Someone should put out a book on moving Linux users from the mindeset that Win98 and WinME and DOS are NOT Win2k, or WinXP...

    BSOD, you are kidding right? If you see one of these with WinXP or Win2K you have serious hardware issues, PERIOD.

    How about a book that get Linux users to open their eyes to the NT model and WinXp and get away from the world of hacker quality drivers and frequent Kernel Panic bringing the Linux system to halt.

    Title should be:
    "Kernel Panic No More - Move to WindowsXP!"

    I truly don't even dislike Linux, I just wanted to throw a concept across the fence that people here seem to forget about.

    Also, there are many people that use WindowsXP and 200x servers in production environments with consistent stability.

    Windows may have had the BSOD back in the DOS days, or a infrequent one with the NT core when having a hardware or driver issue, but 99% of the users don't see WindowsXP as instable EVER.

    If you keep harping on Windows as being instable you are never going to get anyone's attention. Mainstream users on XP just don't have the BSOD or other problems that you like to portray them as having.

    So now lets talk about Kernel problems with Linux and the Kernel Panic of Death. (KPOD)

    Which I have seen more often than the BSOD on Windows and we run 90% Windows/ 10% *nix systems. Ironic or just silly?
  • I've been using Linux as my primary desktop at home since 1998, but I picked up the book primarily for my wife (who made the leap to Linux somewhere around 2001 due to a magical combination of getting tired of having to constantly reboot and the availability of StarOffice). My hope was that she would find Marcel's style approachable enough to dig into the things she was interested in on her own. That didn't pan out, though; she's happier just asking me a quick question when she runs into a dead end.

    However, I found myself learning a few things about KDE from the book that I wasn't aware of due to my WindowMaker / Gnome past:

    • Kooka is a good front end for scanning, a little nicer than xsane
    • K3B is a kick-butt CD burner, miles ahead of xcdroast: look ma, I can burn DVDs! (This is the one part of the book my wife refers to occasionally)
    • KDE's printing configuration console is well thought out and works well

    So I went from being a primarily command-line oriented guy to trusting a little more in the nice GUI apps that KDE supplies... and it has been good. I'm happy that I picked up Marcel's book.

    By the way, he didn't write this book using the French chef schtick that he uses for his Linux Journal "Cooking with Linux" columns, for which I'm quite thankful. I enjoy the columns, but a full book of that would be too much. Instead, he adopts a personal tone that is straightforward and pleasant to read.

  • It's nice that it comes with Knoppix, but I seriously question introducing new users to RPM distros. Knoppix is dpkg-based, which means you can readily migrate it to Debian without much hassle. Given that Debian just works and RPM distros send you through dependency hell on a badly fragmented format, it seems like the intuitive choice would have been to show new users how to get started with Knoppix immediately and migrate that over to Debian.
  • by chrisranjana.com (630682) on Wednesday August 04 2004, @04:39AM (#9877038)
    (http://www.chrisranjana.com/)
    I guess the blue screen has been kissed goodbye in windows 2000 for good.
  • by pandrijeczko (588093) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:31PM (#9871654)
    ...how is it that a software title that is guaranteed to sell by the millions, meaning that the cost of manufacturing each copy is very low, meaning that shops will buy hundreds of copies in at a discounted rate, is still given a standard price of $54.99 in the US/£34.99 in the UK unless there is some heavy price fixing going on...

    Stores are ripping us all of over this... don't pirate it but don't buy it either unless you can find a lower price that reflects the likely sales of it.

    Perhaps John Carmack would like to comment on that...

    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Switch to OS X (Score:2)

    by pandrijeczko (588093) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:37PM (#9871720)
    Unfortunately, I find working at a computer on my coffee table (the usual location of a MAC, I understand) very strenuous on the spine...

    Look, I don't use MACs but I respect that people like them. So can't all us smelly Linux geeks have a big group hug with all the MAC people in their Nautica gear, united in the knowledge that neither of our groups finance the great demon in Redmond.

    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Must know? (Score:3, Informative)

    by pgrst (662201) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:42PM (#9871771)
    Yes, games and multimedia are just so important to me when I begin learning a new OS! Not to mention specific examples of Linux games that I have never heard of and certainly wouldn't play. This right here ends the "importance" of this book for me and should also end it for everyone else.

    1) You are not the intended audience of this book.

    2) You are right, multimedia is of no interest whatsoever to the average user. I mean, who ever heard of playing music on their computer? Next you'll be trying to convince me that there is a compressed audio standard that is listened to by millions of users everyday...... For the average user, multimedia is one of the most important issues.
    [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:Switch to OS X (Score:2)

    by TrancePhreak (576593) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @03:55PM (#9871906)
    Looks like Steve is still busy at work.
    [ Parent ]
  • by nurb432 (527695) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:02PM (#9871982)
    (http://slashdot.org/~nurb432/ | Last Journal: Friday August 27 2004, @03:24PM)
    Keep in mind a lot of windows users have invested a bit of cash in their machine, and asking them to just toss it out the window and buy a Mac isn't going to win many friends..

    At least suggesting ( or assisting ) they migrate to Linux or a BSD variant will let them keep most, if not all, of their invested hardware...

    Also, to be a bit more accurate, it would be communistic style, not socialistic.. ( at least by traditional definitions, not the convenient, but incorrect, ones that were dreamed up in the 50's to support the 'red scare' )
    [ Parent ]
    • Second Coming by nurb432 (Score:2) Tuesday August 03 2004, @08:05PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by thephotoman (791574) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:03PM (#9871995)
    (Last Journal: Tuesday May 10 2005, @07:05AM)
    What? # rpm -i is too hard for them? I mean, yeah, sometimes, tarballs can be rather tricky, especially when hey don't stick to the normal ./configure, make, make install routine, but what's so hard about an RPM?
    [ Parent ]
  • by pandrijeczko (588093) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:21PM (#9872211)
    Who makes that operating system then?
    [ Parent ]
  • by marsu_k (701360) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @04:29PM (#9872294)
    That said, most computer users would prefer having a "blue screen of death" once in a while to having to deal with command line installs from rpm's...
    What, like "urpmi $APPNAME"? Call me perverted, but I do prefer that to BSODs.
    [ Parent ]
  • by Le Marteau (206396) on Tuesday August 03 2004, @05:01PM (#9872601)
    (Last Journal: Wednesday November 21, @11:15AM)
    Carmack needs to get over it, and stop pissing and moaning. He's dealing in a highly piratable medium. That's a fact. There's not a whole lot you can do about software piracy. That's another fact. If you know those facts and choose to go into that business, you can't then go about boo-hooing how unfair it is. It's like becoming a fire eater and then bitching and moaning, "Oh, that fire is so HOT! Something has to be done!"

    Carmack, if the situation is so goddamned untenable, take your baseball and go the fuck home .
    [ Parent ]
  • 1. GNU is not geared towards the desktop. 2. The filesystem layout is not geared towards the desktop.
    I don't see any support for these statements in the rest of your article. If there is some, then please point it out.
    3. X11/KDE/GNOME are poor and slow systems compared to everything else. (QNX Neutrino Micro GUI, SkyOS, OS X, Windows, BeOS, you name it)
    "Poor and slow" is relative to the type of box. You've got two obvious red flags here, I dunno which is the bulk of your problem:
    1. Old graphics card, buggy driver. If the manufacturer keeps the specs closed, then Linux engineers are stuck with reverse-engineering, and shouldn't be blamed all that much for problems. (If the manufacturer has opened the specs, and Linux engineers have failed to use them properly, then they should be blamed.)
    2. KDE/Gnome are heavyweights. Try something lighter, e.g. Fluxbox, IceWM, WindowMaker, XFCE.
    [ Parent ]
  • 21 replies beneath your current threshold.