Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Linux For Housewives. XP For Geeks.

Posted by CmdrTaco on Wed Jul 09, 2008 09:00 AM
from the or-just-cheapskates dept.
Talinom writes "ZDNet has an article sure to raise the hackles of any self-respecting geek. They report that housewives buying small laptops like the Asus EE are causing Linux usage for that demographic to spike. A reporter for Tech-On states that 'Retailers and contract manufacturers in Taiwan say that novice PC users there, like students and housewives, tend to buy the Linux version of the Eee PC701, while geeks go for Windows XP.'"
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • I 4 1 (Score:5, Funny)

    by Mipoti Gusundar (1028156) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:02AM (#24116639) Journal

    I 4 1 amd welcomming our new script bashing apron wearing apple pie bakeing overlady's!

  • Taiwan culture is not US culture, of course. I imagine that even Geek culture is different between the two cultures.
    • by mikkl666 (1264656) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:13AM (#24116853)
      Well, I lived in Taiwan for quite a while, and I think Windows is quite common among geeks because (for no clear reason) MSN Messenger has become the No. 1 communication vehicle among the young folks. No one ever asked my ICQ No. or mail address, just my MSN name. Which I still don't have, by the way.
    • by WibbleOnMars (1129233) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:18AM (#24116985)

      Taiwan culture is not US culture, of course.

      Maybe not, but the UK is much more similar, and I've stood in a Dixons store here and listened to the salesman talking to a novice about the EeePC on display, explaining its OS as "Linux is low powered and suitable for a beginner."

      Granted, Dixons aren't the only people selling EeePCs, but they are definitely targetting EeePC at the less technically savvy.

      • by Kupfernigk (1190345) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @10:10AM (#24118051)
        Please cut your geek card across with a pair of ceramic scissors and hand it in at your local Citizen's Advice Centre for controlled demolition.

        True story, I once worked with an ex-Dixon's manager who admitted they looked for ignorant and easily cowed staff because they could exploit them, whereas the technically capable could easily get better weekend jobs somewhere else. Of course, you can guess the kind of managers they employ.

    • by Icarium (1109647) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:21AM (#24117045)

      It's interesting to observer how the mere mention of the word 'geek' on /. is automatically assumed to mean someone who has at least an interest in IT.

      Geeks were around before computers. Not all geeks are IT savvy, not all IT savvy people are geeks.

  • Hmm.. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by iXiXi (659985) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:04AM (#24116687)
    Well, I am not sure that housewives can't be geeks. Maybe they confuse geeks that are buying XP with idiots? I wouldn't think that a true 'geek' would give a rat's buttocks about what OS came on the hardware. I put what I want on there when I get home.
  • Reasoning? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by LightPhoenix7 (1070028) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:07AM (#24116729)
    The article was short on details (aside from the study being in Taiwan), but my guess would be that the "geeks" are the ones playing video games, and unfortunately most of the big titles are constrained to Windows. On the other hand, a computer you're only using for e-mail and web browsing should opimally be as cheap as possible, and you certainly don't get cheaper on an OS than free.
    • Re:Reasoning? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by UnknowingFool (672806) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:15AM (#24116891)
      And also for the most part the average person doesn't really care if it runs Linux, Unix, Windows, BeOS, or whatever. They just want it to work. Being cheaper is a large factor when the price of the computer is only $200, and $50 difference is a lot. Also being so cheap if the consumer knows if that the Linux version isn't fully adequate, they can just get the Windows version. Yes, you can install XP over Linux on the EEE PC, but for the average consumer going to the store and spending $250 is a lot easier than figuring out installation of a new OS. Especially these days where you can't get XP at retail anymore.
  • by MrKaos (858439) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:08AM (#24116757) Journal
    She loves it because it fits in her hand bag, "it runs linux eh? what's linux? It does what I need it to do and it's cuuuttteee"
    • by Lonewolf666 (259450) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:17AM (#24116965)

      And this shows that Linux is now usable for non-geeks when preinstalled. Many of those users wouldn't be able to reinstall their Windows either ;-)

      There is still a lot of software that is only available for Windows (in particular games), but the OS itself is just as usable as Windows.

        • by Lonewolf666 (259450) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:48AM (#24117657)

          Nice troll, but I'll explain the difference to all the previous Linux installations:

          Among geeky types, it was already widely believed that Ubuntu (for instance) is just as easy to setup and use as Windows. But those people already have computer knowledge which may help them over some points where a non-geek may feel stumped. So they do not exactly represent the average user.

          Computers that come preinstalled with Linux have been rare, and this is the first time lots of them get into the hands of non-experts. So people like GP's girlfriend are the real test of how newbie-friendly linux is. One of them is anecdotal, lots of them make a valid test. Give it a few months and both your and my post will be irrelevant because the results of the test are out.

  • Windows (Score:5, Insightful)

    by blind biker (1066130) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:09AM (#24116769) Journal

    I didn't know that the day would come, when I would feel more unfamiliar (didn't say uncomfortable - but I guess that's coming, too, with Vista (oh yeah, I don't intend to move to Vista - ever)) in Windows than in Linux. But, alas, that day has come and now I have no clue how to troubleshoot Windows anymore. It's just way too arcane and complicated. In Linux and Solaris I know how to at least start troubleshooting, and then I can search the 'net for specific keywords (error messages, log entries, etc.). Some of this could probably be done with Windows as well, but I just find the "whole experience" of troubleshooting it, more hairy and unsettling.

    • Re:Windows (Score:5, Funny)

      by pla (258480) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:26AM (#24117143) Journal
      But, alas, that day has come and now I have no clue how to troubleshoot Windows anymore.

      Silly, you don't troubleshoot Windows anymore.

      First, you reboot.

      If that fails to fix the problem, you roll back to the last restore point.

      If that fails, you reinstall from the recovery partition.

      And if even that fails, you call it a hardware failure and buy a new one.



      Troubleshoot... Kids these days, sheesh.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:12AM (#24116839)

    Housewives are used to getting the products that have the best cost-benefit ratio.

    The Eee is a machine that provides wireless web browsing and email, instant messaging, etc.

    And it's cheaper without XP.

    It's a no-brainer then.

    As for why do geeks prefer XP? I can speak for myself and say that I thoroughly know the beast, it is a pleasure to google for the most wild assed software/driver you can think of and find that due to the widespread presence of the thing, pretty sure SOMEONE has gone through the same ordeal as you, and has posted a workaround.
    It works, and given current hardware configurations and provided that you configure it properly, it is FAST.

    I know it is light years away from an elegant OS from an academic's point of view, but I rather have XP on an Eee and be open to all the possibilities of interaction with other peripherals (oh, how our choice of words reveal one's age) than spending time tweaking linux.

  • Yes and? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Corporate Troll (537873) * on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:13AM (#24116861) Homepage Journal

    I bough the 701 4G a few months ago. My father in law liked it so much, and after hearing the price, ordered two for his kids: 4yo and 12yo. (Kids from his second wife: I'm not married to a 4yo or 12yo).

    Anyway, I'm surprised to hear the geeks take the XP version. I'm actually quite happy with the default Xandros install. It even has perl, ruby and python for crying out loud!

  • by scenestar (828656) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:14AM (#24116875) Homepage Journal

    I guess that instead of the year of the linux desktop we should be celebrating the year of the linux laptop

    Funny, Considering the fact that Linux + laptops used to be one of the biggest headaches in the world.

  • by sootman (158191) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:16AM (#24116931) Journal

    2008 will be the year of XP on the desktop!

    Er, laptop. whatever.

  • Sounds reasonable (Score:5, Insightful)

    by 427_ci_505 (1009677) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:16AM (#24116933)

    I've never bought a copy of linux.

    Or windows, for that matter.

    _>

  • Browsing and Mail (Score:5, Insightful)

    by fermion (181285) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:18AM (#24116967) Homepage Journal
    Honestly, what does the average person need. Browsing, mail, photos? Sure, for multimedia Linux may not have the integration that something like Mac OS does, but neither does XP.

    In many cases a more technical person has to have a Windows OS, either because they have to test against it, or they code in Visual Studio, or run some XP only app.

    The prevailing mindset is that it is better to run the same OS at home as at work, if, for no other reason, the work software can be often be used at home as well. But with all the free and cheap software, and with the often extreme difficulty of keeping a MS Windows machine running, it is no longer a sure bet to run MS Windows at home. Many people are realizing that MS Windows is targeted to the corporate user, and requires corporate resources for the average person to use.

    *nix, OTOH, if it is kept simple, and has some vendor support, can be run by the average person.

    • by AusIV (950840) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:56AM (#24117797)
      I've said for a long time that Linux is great for the least technical users and the most technical users, but the more mid-range users will have problems.

      In my family, my mom does just fine on Ubuntu. She checks e-mail, browses the web, writes documents, etc. Occasionally she'll say "Do you know of a program that will let me ...", and I'll install it for her and show her how to use it. That's how it worked on Windows, that's how it works on Linux.

      On the opposite end of the spectrum, I want complete control of my system. I want to be able control exactly what services run. I want to script specific events to happen at specific times. If the mood strikes me, I want to modify a program to better suit my needs. I have the knowledge and ability to do this, and Linux fits the bill far better than Windows.

      In the middle, there's my dad. He got me my first computer when I was three. He has some exclusively Windows software that he needs for work, and they won't run under Wine. He'll frequently go out and download or buy a software package and install it himself. The expectations he has of his computer were defined by Microsoft going back as far as DOS. He's a quite competent computer user, but I suspect he'd have problems adapting to the differences presented by Ubuntu.

  • Games (Score:5, Insightful)

    by swordgeek (112599) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:18AM (#24116973) Journal

    Geeks play games that run under XP. Housewives (househusbands, most of the rest of the universe) don't play games often, and when they do, they're browser-based or included in the OS.

    Nothing to see here.

  • by jeebusroxors (812064) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:36AM (#24117359)
    Wimins? On computers? What will they try next....
    • Re:Different reason (Score:5, Informative)

      by rvw (755107) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:13AM (#24116843)

      The geeks are buying the XP version to install their own flavor of Linux as a dual-boot?

      Then they are stupid geeks. The Windows version has a smaller disk, so it makes more sense to buy the Linux version.

    • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:22AM (#24117073)
      Linux... housewives? Only cheesy pr0n can result. "I'm here to repair your Linux install ma'am. OOohh, I see the problem right here. I just need to $unzip this and $touch that. Now let's $fsck!" ~Bow chica wow wow~
    • Re:BLASPHEMY! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by CKW (409971) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:24AM (#24117103) Journal

      No no, this makes perfect sense.

      Housewives don't play video games and download a bajillion "utilities". Geeks do.

      Housewives want to browse the web and use e-mail, and have a stable safe system.

      Geeks love the chaos and security challenges that is posed by Windows.

      • by pembo13 (770295) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @10:12AM (#24118097) Homepage
        I have to say, a stable Linux distro can be pretty boring. I like Fedora though, they throw in little quirks every now and then to make it all interesting.
      • Re:BLASPHEMY! (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 09 2008, @10:39AM (#24118553)

        I have been living this reality for awhile now. My parents and grandparents use Ubuntu (I forced/tricked it onto them), and are getting along just fine. When it comes to basic computer use, Linux has been ready for the Desktop for about a two years. I myself cannot stand using it, since all the weird apps I use only work with Windows. I like Linux, but it is the applications that are important, not the operating system.

      • Re:BLASPHEMY! (Score:5, Informative)

        by LandDolphin (1202876) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @11:03AM (#24118909)
        Look at the Product Features:

        Internal 4GB SSD based Hard Drive
        Intel 900Mhz Mobile ULV 512MB DDR2 Memory
        Intel 910GML Chipset
        7" LCD screen with 800x480 pixels resolution
        10/100 LAN WiFi b/g
        Built-in 300k pixel webcam
        Built-in stereo speaker and microphone
        Interfaces include SD card slot, 3x USB 2.0, Mic and Headphone Jack, VGA Out
        Ultimate Speed - 10 Sec Bootup, 5 Sec Shutdown
        Windows XP compatible
        Optional USB Based External Optical Drive
        Optional Carry Case
        3 hours of battery life
        Measures (WxHxD) 225 x 21-35 x 165 mm
        Weighs 890g


        Who is "video games and download a bajillion 'utilities'", geek or housewife? That is unless your talking about games from 1998.
        • Re:BLASPHEMY! (Score:5, Informative)

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 09 2008, @10:37AM (#24118513)

          the Windows version is cheaper, or so I've heard.

          You heard *very* wrong.

          When comparing identical hardware, the Windows version is much more expensive. When you look at the model numbers, the Linux and Windows versions are the same price, but the Linux version comes with a much larger SSD.

        • by dave420 (699308) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @11:01AM (#24118871)
          You can upgrade from Windows 3.11 any time you want, fyi.
        • Re:BLASPHEMY! (Score:5, Insightful)

          by spymagician (1303515) on Wednesday July 09 2008, @11:07AM (#24118971)
          Since the Asus EEE mini laptops actually come with a Linux distro pre-installed, I'd have to say your theory is critically flawed. They're buying the LAPTOP not the OS. It's incidental that the laptop has a Linux distro on it.
        • Re:BLASPHEMY! (Score:5, Informative)

          by Just Some Guy (3352) <kirk+slashdot@strauser.com> on Wednesday July 09 2008, @11:20AM (#24119187) Homepage Journal

          The last thing they want to do is wait for Windows to load, defrag for an hour, update the antivirus, and then start using facebook...

          Ugh, tell me about it. We had to buy a Vista laptop for my wife to run a medical practice management app, and it's a dual-core system with 2GB of memory. By all accounts it's a fast computer, but by the time Vista finishes booting, all of the "update me!" dialogs have been clicked, and it's actually ready to use, she's cussing at the thing.

          By contrast, my Eee PC 4G goes from powered-off to using Firefox in under 30 seconds. It actually ships with an antivirus app if you must have that weekly display of pointlessness, but it doesn't run by default. What's not to like about a system that's infinitely more usable than the much faster, more expensive computer sitting next to it?

    • by alx5000 (896642) <.alx5000. .at. .alx5000.net.> on Wednesday July 09 2008, @09:52AM (#24117737) Homepage
      My mom's been using it [wordpress.com] for ages, I don't really get all the hassle now...