Slashdot Log In
How Dell Is Making Ubuntu Linux More Attractive
Posted by
timothy
on Sat Jul 26, 2008 05:12 PM
from the gussyin'-n'-prettyin' dept.
from the gussyin'-n'-prettyin' dept.
CWmike writes "Dell was the first of the major computer manufacturers to support pre-installed Linux, but it's not just pre-installing Linux. The Austin, Tex. company is also adding functionality to Ubuntu Linux on its desktops and laptops, writes Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols. It began by adding DVD-playback to its systems shipping with Ubuntu 7.10. With the recent release of Dell PCs with Ubuntu 8.04, Dell is now including 'Fluendo GStreamer codecs for mp3, wma (Windows Media Audio), and wmv (Windows Media Video) playback' in its latest Ubuntu-powered desktops and laptops. On Ubuntu systems with ATI or NIVDIA graphics, Dell also now supports HDMI output. Yesterday, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said his company hopes to steal a page from Apple's playbook and change how it works with hardware makers in an attempt to duplicate its rival's success. Is OS customization the way forward for desktop Linux, and Windows?"
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Making more attractive.... (Score:5, Insightful)
It's really a no-brainer- if you're going to sell computers, they better be able to do out of the box everything that people know computers can do. They'll save $$$ on call-centre robots, there's no choice.
Re: (Score:2)
Are they mutually exclusive?
Many of the biggest boons to open source software have come about not because of converts to the religion, but because of business seeking the best solution to a given problem. If paying $x to customize Ubuntu is cheaper than paying $x+y to support users without it, most businesses are going to customize Ubuntu for sufficiently large values of y.
Win-win.
Re:Making more attractive.... (Score:4, Insightful)
My larger concern is are they doing it correctly? Are they adding this functionality by creating policy compliant debs and installing them? If not they are actually hurting Ubuntu by making it harder for the Ubuntu support systems to function.
Debian (and thus its derivatives) has historically had one of the nicest package management systems (although these days emerge and yum have made the difference much much smaller than it once was). However the cost of that is that the system requires that packages conform to a relatively strict set of policies, and that hand installed software be installed into /usr/local instead of /usr.
Debs not conforming to those policies, or manual installation of software to /usr can potentially wreck havoc on the system. even if it does not, any problems resulting from them can be far more difficult to diagnose.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I believe it's going to be just the opposite ..... more support calls. Once again everyone is missing the point. It's not the OS -- it's the ability to get things done. I loved OS/2 and BeOS but they were ultimately useless because of a lack of appications and device drivers.
For example my 75 year old aunt has been heavily interested in Geneolgy for many years and has hundreds of pages of data and photos. So she decided that she wanted a computer. She went to Best Buy and bought a Gateway and one of he
Re:Making more attractive.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I think an important issue is the fact that we, as consumers, allow retail to tell us that we cannot return open box software. Hell, you can even return open food to a supermarket, but you can't return an item that has (effectively) no expiration date.
Re:Making more attractive.... (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, because someone who thinks a computer is just the same as any other computer and isn't even told by the person setting it up what's going on. When you don't even know that such things as alternate operating systems EXIST, then no, you're not at fault for someone else just going and installing something without your knowledge.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Um, your argument makes no sense. Nowadays, unless you are specifically told otherwise, you can usually safely assume that your car will take unleaded. Besides, if the box for the machine says "windows" but the idiot nephew installs ubuntu without telling her, how would she know?
Re:Making more attractive.... (Score:4, Insightful)
She may very well see lots of logos at boot-time. The BIOS might very well show Energy Star. Her monitor might flash a Gateway logo. The motherboard could plop another logo on her screen. If she's still paying attention to the fourth logo in the boot sequence, and by some miracle remembers "Ubuntu" (I can nearly guarantee she will not realize that's a word in some language somewhere in Africa), then she moves on to the challenge of moving from Ubuntu to Linux (another un-word) and then realizing that's something other than Windows. When her computer itself, in all likelihood, is plastered with Windows logos because that's what she actually purchased.
A PC is a complex machine and an appliance.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
And, if you would actually read my comment, you would notice that, no, i did not say that it was because of apple, ms, or linux; i said it was because of people who know nothing saying "This is awesome! Use it!" and then not being able to help when something invariably comes up.
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps I misunderstood you a bit. I understand the frustration involved, but I was assuming you were saying it was a problem with open source as opposed to the nephew. The problem was that the nephew put your aunt into a situation that she could not maintain herself. I agree that that can be a problem, but it's only a problem of communication and understanding between the two parti
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Unless she bought a toy digital camera with a non-standard chipset, it should have worked fine. Either digiKam or f-spot should have been able to find and download the photos. If not, the camera should have shown up on the desktop and you could have used copy/paste to get them onto the hard disk. Sounds like Granny was talked into buying a cheap camera instead of a good one.
Re:Making more attractive.... (Score:4, Insightful)
Sadly, your comment will be overlooked or modded down, as will mine. The OP of this thread told one of those phony "case study" stories cooked up by marketing to sow fear about competing products. Aunt Mildred? Are you serious? Unfortunately, a lot of people bought into the fake story.
The FACT is as you point out: virtually any digital camera will work perfectly on Linux without installing anything. Just plug the camera in, and it works. The FACT is also that an HP photo printer/scanner/copier will work instantly, just plug it in.
The FACT is that if you sat down with 20 consumer devices, a Linux box, and a Windows box, and installed no software/drivers/etc., that 15+ of those devices would work just fine on Linux and probably zero of them would work on Windows. And even after installing software and drivers, you will wouldn't get more than 18 out of 20 working perfectly on Windows -- you'd have to hunt on websites for updated drivers or some garbage like that. Whereas additional software installation on Linux will also get you up to 18 out of 20 devices. No different at all in the final analysis, except that for most of the devices it's easier to get up and running on Linux.
So, OP, please take your fabricated "Aunt Mildred" stories back to 1999 where they belong.
Parent
Re:Making more attractive.... (Score:5, Interesting)
The nephew left out one of the largest strengths of Ubuntu when showing it to your aunt.
The fact that you can easilly install a large amount of Free Software using the add/remove programs menu.
I did some Googling, and turned up some Free genealogy Software called GRAMPS [gramps-project.org]. I don't know if it's in the ubuntu software respositories, but it probably is. If not, there are Ubuntu debs on the page. So, as for the genealogy software, she wouldn't have to have gone to the store to start with, and she wouldn't have had that problem.
As for the scanner and digital cameras, it's unfortunate that the cameras she ended up getting didn't work with Ubuntu. It's often frustrating for me to buy certain kinds of hardware myself, and I run the slightly more mainstream Mac OS X. (As good as Ubuntu is, and I think it's definitely better than Windows, I still prefer Mac OS X.) But, the point it, there *are* scanners and digital cameras out there that work with Linux. And had she bought a Dell with Ubuntu on it (which this article is about), you bet she'd probably be able to call them to ask about compatible hardware.
In the end, I'd say the fault was with the nephew for not educating your aunt with two simple facts:
- It's Ubuntu, and you can actually find lots of software to do what you want to do using the add/remove programs program, which is a better way to find software than going to your local computer store and hope they have Linux software.
- It's Ubuntu which means you have to make sure any hardware you buy will work with your system.
In the end though, I have to agree with the point you were making -- Ubuntu preinstalled on a Dell will probably cause some more support calls to Dell -- calls that wouldn't have been made were the computer preinstalled with Windows.
However -- Ubuntu preinstalled might also lead to *less* support calls, because of less problems with spyware, malware, adware, crapware and viruses.
Though, I guess you could argue that's a negative for Dell too. No more buying another computer after a year, and throwing away the old one because it's infested with crapware. Why should Dell rock the boat? >:-)
Parent
And what about BIOS upgrades? (Score:2, Insightful)
Dell are releasing BIOS upgrades for their laptops to cope with the Nvidia weak component problem (basically the fan will spin up sooner). This includes the laptop models that come with Linux preinstalled. Except there's no BIOS updater that will run under Linux; they're all Windows [direct2dell.com] based (although if you have a DOS floppy knocking around you can use that)
<tongue location="cheek"> Of course that might be ok as lets face it 3d gaming under Linux is as likely as Stallman shaving and looking respectabl
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Dell are releasing BIOS upgrades for their laptops to cope with the Nvidia weak component problem (basically the fan will spin up sooner). This includes the laptop models that come with Linux preinstalled. Except there's no BIOS updater that will run under Linux; they're all Windows [direct2dell.com] based (although if you have a DOS floppy knocking around you can use that)
Umm...Dell has a Linux BIOS updater in its SMBIOS library [dell.com]. The only downside is that you might have to install wine for the image extraction (though it says it is still doable without).
Re:And what about BIOS upgrades? (Score:5, Informative)
What the hell? You have such a low userID
I have never been unable to apply a BIOS update using a bootable Free DOS CD. (And prior to that, OpenDOS.) There's an ISO at the Free DOS website. It doesn't get any easier than that. So what was your complaint again?
Parent
You Gotta Do it Yourself.... (Score:3, Interesting)
Yes.. it does seem that Dell is at least paying lip service to Ubuntu/Linux, but just *try* to find the few systems that Dell has deemed to have Ubuntu installed on.. Not easy at all.. And when you do stumble upon the page, they try to scare you off by insinuating that you won't be getting Windows if you buy a system from the following pages.. Oh yeah, they're *really* supporting Linux.. I wanted a nice Core2Duo laptop with Ubuntu on it.. The only ones they preinstall Ubuntu on are the Inspiron/XPS systems.. I wanted a corporate system, ie: Latitude or Vostro system with it... Solly Cholly, only these few systems will we offend the great M$ on.. So I checked out the Dell Outlet, found a VERY nice Vostro 1400 with most everything I wanted, for $519, and proceeded to wipe Microsoft Yawn (also known as Vista) off it, and installed Ubuntu, which was a piece of cake.. But, since it came with Windows, MS gets to claim it as one of the hundreds of thousands of copies of Vista they've shipped..
Thanks Dell.. Great machines, but you don't seem to have the balls to stand up to M$...
Re: (Score:2)
I take your point about the choice but in the UK site at least its easier to find Ubuntu [dell.com] (its on both the desktop and laptop drop down menus) than XP [dell.com] which is currently blank and recommending Vista.
Re:You Gotta Do it Yourself.... (Score:4, Informative)
It's not that hard to find Open Source/Ubuntu systems on the Dell US site:
Open www.dell.com, choose "For Home", then click "Laptop" from the drop-down menu. Open Source systems are linked under the heading "PC Operating Systems" on the left side menu (bottom of menu).
Or, www.dell.com, choose "For Office > Small Business", then click "Desktop" from the drop-down menu. Open Source systems are listed under "FreeDOS and Linux Desktops"
Now, as for the selection of systems, I'm happy with the systems they offer ($WORK just bought a fleet of new "N Series" desktops (Optiplex 755n to be exact), and there was a fine selection of hardware/upgrades available (including ATI discrete graphics cards)...
If they really wanted to hide them, they could have done a much better job of it... I think if I were truely looking for a system with no OS/Ubuntu, I could find it quite easily.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Motherboard? (Score:2)
Anybody know of a motherboard with HDMI out that supports audio? The closest I've seen is the Asus P5E-VM HDMI [asus.com], but haven't been able to find anything definitive on HDMI audio support in Linux.
HDMI is a nice step, but ... (Score:2)
HDMI is a nice step, but how does it handle h.264 decoding? Does it have hardware decoding in the GPUs or simply work by CPU decoding? And in either case, what kind of performance does it deliver? 1080p easily? Choppy? 720p?
Re: (Score:2)
Any modern CPU can play 1080p h.264 easily, purely in software. My 2.5 year old Athlon X2 4200+ (2x 2.2 Ghz) can play 1080p h.264 content perfectly, with only ~85% CPU usage of one core (the other being entirely idle).
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
An Atom CPU is a modern CPU ... and I sincerely doubt that it could hand'e 1080p h.264 even at full speed.
Perhaps this time the message will sink in (Score:2)
.
Michael Robertson [wikipedia.org] spent seven years trying to hammer this lesson home with Linspire and CNR.
Re: (Score:2)
I see you have slashdotter installed in firefox.
I really hate to constantly bash ubuntu, but it really should come with all this stuff OUT OF THE BOX. Sabayon comes with all of this stuff ready to go, and that's part of why I like it so much; i don't have to muck about with this shit.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Ubuntu CANNOT legally provide them, and I guess you might see how a gratis OS cannot pay Fluendo or the DVD mafia for legit codecs. Dell can, with the customer's money.
Also, besides DVD decryption, Ubuntu offers to install the required codecs when you want to play files that need them (but warns you that you are responsible for legality yourself). Besides, any Windows I have seen to this day came without divx codecs and Media Player failed to install them when it tried.
Microsoft will stop them if it gets serious (Score:2)
Every time some big player starts pushing Linux, Microsoft makes it go away. Wal-Mart has sold Linux machiens twice, then backed off; they no longer seem to sell any Linux machines. Fry's has stopped selling Linux machines.
Go to the Dell site [dell.com] and try to find a Linux laptop. It's quite hard to find. Even when you finally find the Ubuntu page, for which you will probably have to search, the first thing you see is "Not sure Open Source is for You? The main thing to note is that when you choose open source
Re: (Score:2)
I think many of the WalMart Linux machines were retrurned by people thinking computer == run all the software WalMart sells. The best market for general public Linux users are those who don't need to constantly play the latest game or just for email, office work, such as grandparents or young kids - they would welcome something that does not get messed up all the time.
Dell are using non free software (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
What's the alternative?
1) Risk licensing lawsuit from codec owners
or
2) Ship without codec support.
If you want your linux to suck. Uninstall.
Re:Dell are using non free software (Score:4, Insightful)
When I was young I had an older man explain to me "I strongly disagree with what you are saying, but I would fight to the death for your right to say it."
Perhaps the spirit of the Linux community would be better served by promoting true software freedom, including the freedom to use non-free software in order to do what a Linux user wants to do.
That is, after all, what freedom is all about.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
The "Free" software is also supposedly illegal as they didnt pay the mathematics patent fees.
Dell is only doing things legal. I cant blame them for that, nor can the MPEG2 patent holders.
using Dell as a good example? (Score:2)
Look, it's great they offer the option to get Ubuntu preinstalled, but you might want to look at what exactly they're doing before holding them up as a good example. If you go through the build process for an XPS1330, you'll find that there are FAR fewer hardware options available when building a Ubuntu-based machine compared to a Vista-based machine, and I'm not talking about hardware for which there may not be drivers, either. Fewer CPU options, storage options, etc. It's completely ridiculous, and it pro
Mr. Language Person says (Score:2, Informative)
"Codices" is the plural of codex (i.e. book), not codec. Unless the summary really does mean that Dell is throwing in a collection of books from Fluendo about the mp3, wma, and wmv formats, in which case I apologize.
More attractive? (Score:3, Funny)
When I read the headline I thought they meant Dell was re-branding it and removing the orange/brown!
On a slightly more serious note, it's good to see that they're doing what the consumer needs and making things like MP3/DVD playback easier. Yes, it might upset some purists, but they can just buy the machine and wipe back to a default, or go for a machine from another company that can't afford to bundle the codecs.
Re:Restore discs? (Score:5, Informative)
Your argument fails on 3 fronts:
1. It presupposes that most/all elderly are stupid.
2. It's easier to install the major Linux distributions than it is to install Windows of any flavor.
3. The need for restore disks isn't as vital as for Windows.
A. Windows users think it's normal to wipe and reinstall every quarter.
B. Linux doesn't have a half-life/slowdown rate. See 4.
4. The cause of needing restore disks is usually infection. While technically Linux is vulnerable to security problems, the number of "in the wild" Linux viruses is currently 0. Most, if not all, Linux trojans need some sort of user interaction to work. One needs to deliberately shoot one's self in the foot for them to work. Microsoft would do everyone a lot of favors in this department by abandoning Active Yecchs and abandoning the use of 3 magic letters at the end of a filename to determine executability.
5. It's easier to remotely admin through ssh Great Aunt Midlred's Linux machine than it is to go over to her house. While that's more convenient, I guess the drawback is the lack of cookies. (case in point, I went over to a friend's house the other weekend because he screwed up flash and java. I could have done it from my house, but I wanted to hang out and have beer and chourico sandwiches).
--
BMO - We do what we must because we can
Parent
Re:Restore discs? (Score:4, Funny)
And I can't count.
Jeez..
--
BMO
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
It's easier to remotely admin through ssh Great Aunt Midlred's Linux machine than it is to go over to her house.
Unless the problem is something that prevents the network from coming up. And how is X11 tunneled over SSH any better than Remote Assistance in Windows?
Re: (Score:2)
Ooh! first of all, ssh -x allows per program running. Second of all, is RA in windows even encrypted?
Plus, Great Aunt Mildred should be told "don't fuck about".
Re: (Score:2)
"And how is X11 tunneled over SSH any better than Remote Assistance in Windows?"
Nothing, really, since it's just an implementation of X11 networking ideas.
Seriously though, it took a long time for Microsoft to just catch up to the functionality of X11 over a network. (btw, don't even mention RA over XP Home Edition unless you want to be seriously laughed at)
Besides, /can/ you pipe RA over ssh?
--
BMO
Not that new.... (Score:2)
My /. ID # is less than a third of yours!
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
"The OEM system install is the gold standard in the home and SOHO market"
Hahahahahahahahaah!
"Microsoft to ratchet IE8 security another notch in Beta 2"
First off, it's Beta, meaning Alpha in the rest of the known universe outside of 1 Microsoft Way, Redmond. And nobody outside of 1 Microsoft Way, Redmond uses it.
Secondly, How does this mitigate what Active Yecchs has done for the past 12 years? Think for a minute about the wasted time, tears, and money fighting against this goatse sized security hole. And
Re: (Score:2)
That would be funny if it was true but Ubuntu installs from a Live CD system so its unlikely that situation would arise.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Tomorrow you'll see the exact opposite. It's just Dell and their weird pricing.
Re:not really (Score:4, Informative)
Who would have figured processors would be so different in price...
I redid your test on the US site using the SAME hardware:
Windows ($824): http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/1341/dellwindowsze8.png [imageshack.us]
Ubuntu ($749): http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/3127/dellubuntusp9.png [imageshack.us]
Parent