Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Linux Foundation's Desktop Linux Survey Results

Posted by Zonk on Thu Nov 22, 2007 03:37 PM
from the this-one-goes-out-to-all-the-penguins-out-there dept.
DeviceGuru writes "While the Linux Foundation's third annual desktop Linux survey doesn't officially end until November 30th, the number of daily respondents have shrunk to a trickle and the Foundation is working on analyzing the results. They now have up an early look at the raw data. For starters, almost 20,000 self-selected users filled out this year's survey compared to fewer than 10,000 in 2006's survey. Not surprisingly, the Ubuntu family of Linuxes is the most popular among organizations, at 54.1 percent. This was followed by the Red Hat family — RHEL (Red Hat Enterprise Linux/Fedora/CentOS) — with 50.2 percent. The Novell SUSE group — SLED (SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop) and openSUSE — came in third, with 35.2 percent."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • No Debian? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by cerberusss (660701) <slashdot&vankuik,nl> on Thursday November 22 2007, @03:40PM (#21448375) Homepage Journal
    Both my current and previous employer has supplied me with a Debian desktop. No Ubuntu so far...
    • Re:No Debian? (Score:4, Insightful)

      by yog (19073) * on Thursday November 22 2007, @03:46PM (#21448417) Homepage Journal
      Ubuntu is based on Debian so you could argue that Ubuntu has gotten Debian out to the masses. My home workstations have progressed from Redhat to Fedora to Suse to Ubuntu and I feel that they are all fine distributions with their particular strengths, but Ubuntu definitely wins on the plug-and-play aspects. I put it on a Dell laptop and except for having to manually download and configure ndiswrapper to handle wireless networking, it practically required no technical knowledge. The most recent release in fact does away with the ndiswrapper step, I believe. It's not surprising that Ubuntu wins. I hope that the other distributors learn from the success of Ubuntu and make their next releases "just work", thus undercutting one of Microsoft's main arguments against Linux.
    • by cyphercell (843398) on Thursday November 22 2007, @03:46PM (#21448423) Homepage Journal

      [sarcasm]It's okay, Debian's in the Ubuntu family of Linuxes [/sarcasm]

    • Re:No Debian? (Score:4, Informative)

      by Firefalcon (7323) on Thursday November 22 2007, @04:06PM (#21448569) Homepage Journal
      From the linked article:

      "Debian (22.2 percent)"

      So looking good... :-)
    • That performance or control over the OS isn't what drives adoption, but instead, it is bloat. Ubuntu could be claimed to be less bloated than RHEL and SUSE (both of which drip with bloat), but overall, I was surprised that among corporate offices and IT places that do Linux, not many are really using Gentoo or LFS or some such OS with a higher degree of control over what goes into the final installs, etc.

      Oh well, guess its best to be among the few, than among the many.
      • Yet MS products which give you just about 0% of control are still dominant so It is not surprising that most are Ubuntu, Debian or SUSE based because those give you better hardware detection, plus, Gentoo, LFS, Source Mage, and Arch Linux despite being great distros, lack commercial support that you can get from Red Hat, SUSE and Ubuntu. Also, the fact that you have to rebuild every update from scratch is a real pain on Gentoo, despite it being great for a home user, having 1-2 hours of 100% CPU usage in a
        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          Also, the fact that you have to rebuild every update from scratch is a real pain on Gentoo, despite it being great for a home user, having 1-2 hours of 100% CPU usage in a business means that 1-2 hours employees can't work.

          An institutional Gentoo installation would probably have one or two compile/test machines to produce packages, then just install the binary packages on all the production machines. At least that's how Purdue's CS department seems to do it.

            • And one hundred minions testing for subtle and not so subtle bugs that arise on each of those compilations.

              What are you talking about? It's not like compiling from source is some black art only known to gurus and initiates.

              Using an ebuild that's been marked stable in portage is no more risky or unreliable than using an .rpm or .deb.
        • Re:Proof enough (Score:5, Insightful)

          by jlarocco (851450) on Thursday November 22 2007, @08:27PM (#21450207) Homepage

          Please stay with Gentoo I don't want users like you infecting the other distros.

          I think you've got the infection backwards. If you're ever having a problem on Linux, 99.999% of the time your best bet is to ask a Gentoo or Slackware user.

          Snicker at their elitism, but fact of the matter is your average Gentoo user probably knows 100x more about Linux than your average Ubuntu user.

          • well said.

            To each it's own. The ones who _know_ Linux are a minority, that's why Ubuntu and the like are on 95% of the corporate machines: because 95% of the "professionals" have no clue.

            One's dream is the other's nightmare: If you know it better, you will _prefer_ to have control of everything; if not, you don't want control, you want it to work as it is.

            I used to run Slackware at home, but now I lack the time to fiddle with the machine, so Ubuntu or Fedora are more attractive to me now. But it is still
          • I really hate to agree with you, but since I am a ubuntu user who knows nothing about linux, I really have no argument.

            I love ubuntu. It has everything I need built right in: my hardware is detected right away, it comes with open office, the gimp (which doesn't suck anymore!) a decent mp3 and movie player (why isn't VLC the default?) and loads of games to choose from, and instalation is so easy. it has everything i need right at my fingertips, and its all free.

            I've tinkered with other releases in the past
          • Absolutely correct.

            After all, there's nothing like a distribution which occasionally breaks itself to teach you all about troubleshooting Linux.
    • The survey's your run of the mill online questionnaire. So it's a self-selecting sample (head over to reddit for lots of foaming posts how some mainstream media page took down a poll after Ron Paul got 80% of the votes. The vast leftright-wing conspiracy at work...)

      The only thing it measures is hype, and the most interesting fact you can get from the data is that debian users got better things to do than fill out online-surveys. =)

      Of course this doesn't mean that the data doesn't correlate with reality, i

  • by chrb (1083577) on Thursday November 22 2007, @03:42PM (#21448387)
    www.linuxfoundation.org appears to be some kind of domain search squatter.
  • by Confessed Geek (514779) on Thursday November 22 2007, @03:44PM (#21448411)
    Update the link in the original front page post.

    http://www.linuxfoundation.org/ [linuxfoundation.org] is NOT http://www.linux-foundation.org/ [linux-foundation.org]

    The first is just a traffic collector page.

    The Linux Foundation mentioned in the story is at
    http://www.linux-foundation.org/ [linux-foundation.org]

    Thats where you will find the article/survey.

     
  • "Family"? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Bo'Bob'O (95398) on Thursday November 22 2007, @03:51PM (#21448457)
    Family? I guess that make sense. Ubuntu of the Debian Order, Linux Class, UNIX Phylum. I guess that would make the Genus the particular type (server/home), and the species it's version number.
    • What would be the kingdom?

      Von Neumann architectures?
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Since Linux programs can "mate" for all intents and purposes, wouldn't Linux probably be the Species... with Breed being Debian, and Variety being Ubuntu... the server/client would be a characteristic traits, like blue vs green eyes etc...
  • Server vs. Desktop (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Glowing Fish (155236) on Thursday November 22 2007, @03:55PM (#21448499) Homepage
    Another interesting result from the LF survey is that in most company and organizations, the Linux desktop is more commonly used than Linux servers. From almost the beginning of Linux's business acceptance it has always been assumed that Linux was, is, and would continue to be more of a force on servers than on desktops. That appears to be changing.

    Is it just me, or is this possibly a misleading statement? Does "more commonly used" just mean more numbers? Or does it mean that organizations with Linux desktops aren't running Linux servers? Or just that they have more desktops than servers? Even if it is the first, I still don't think it means too much, because one organization running a gigantic Oracle database on big iron and Linux is going to probably be using Linux more than another organization running Linux and OpenOffice for word processing on 10 or even 50 desktops.
  • by cstdenis (1118589) on Thursday November 22 2007, @03:57PM (#21448517)
    It's official, 2008 will be the year of the Linux desktop.
  • by chrb (1083577) on Thursday November 22 2007, @03:58PM (#21448521)
    Fill in the survey [linux-foundation.org].

    Current results [linux-foundation.org]

    The results say the current number of respondents is 10941 (and counting). Where did the figure of 20,000 come from?

    • ***The results say the current number of respondents is 10941 (and counting). Where did the figure of 20,000 come from?***

      Rounding Error?

      Probably related to the logic that has 139.5% of the users reporting in already.

      In any case, we certainly are not going to blame these little arithmetical peculiarities on Linux. How about we blame Vista, Internet Explorer, the RIAA, George W Bush, and Intel? Don't worry. Ron Paul, Ubuntu, the second amendment and the free market will pull us all through this li

  • Novell downturn? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by brejc8 (223089) * on Thursday November 22 2007, @04:29PM (#21448725) Homepage Journal
    I keep reading how this MS/Novell agreement is gaining customers but here I can see that:
    in 2005 Novell/SUSE got 28%
    in 2006 Novell/SUSE got 16%
    in 2007 Novell/SUSE got 11.7%
    • Well, that just means Linux is growing so fast that although Novell keeps gaining new customers, several other distros are growing even faster than that.

  • Problem (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 22 2007, @04:53PM (#21448935)
    If you fill out the survey, it asks you about anti-virus, and specifically porting bigname AVs to linux.

    A few questions I pose:
    1) Why do we want the bloaty, slow, pieces of crap that are windows AVs ported to linux?

    2) Why do we want to port these, encouraging turning a blind eye to security and letting the AV do the work(such as it is on windows)?
    3) Why not just improve support on say, ClamAV?
  • by _Hellfire_ (170113) on Thursday November 22 2007, @06:41PM (#21449649) Homepage
    linuxfoundation.org appears to be a domain squatter site.

    Whois shows:
    Last Updated On:26-Oct-2007 19:57:38 UTC

    Which is not the same day and month as the creation date, so I'm suspecting either someone has taken this domain over or it wasn't legit in the first place (I don't know as I don't think I've ever been there). Maybe check our links before we post them to the front page on ./? Hits on these types of sites just encourage domain squatting.
  • by dermoth666 (1019892) on Thursday November 22 2007, @06:55PM (#21449749)
    I just took this survey earlier today, and after looking at the results it is obvious that it is totally biased.

    I'm writing from my phone so I won't go in-depth, but two things that bug me the most:

    1: It looks like many home users took the survey, but are being categorized as SOHO's

    2: At first it looks like the survey adress both desktop and server usage, but then the questions begin assuming repondent are using Linux on the desktop workstations. This isn't the case in my company, but he results to these questions are being used to show Linux desktop penetration.

    I also responded to some questions thinking "servers only" but it end up being both servers and workstation. In an organisation with more employees than servers, all running Windows, this obviously change the result!

    I'm not a Linux detractor, quite the opposite, but I'm being honest here. When you do surveys, please ask the right questions and make sure anyone responding to the survey won't bias it if the're not the targetted audience. To me this survey says almost nothing...
    • While the word I'd use is "skewed", I'd basically agree with you.

      There was an original announcement of the survey in the Linux-covering media, and I looked at it but didn't take the survey then, as it seemed only interested in business use. Later, there was additional coverage, asking where all the North American users were, as there had been relatively few such responses to the survey at that point. Most were and still are European, altho the North American response percentage increased from about 10% to
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      I myself have started using Debian sid,
      can't do without apt-get but Ubuntu is going the wrong way (for me)
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward
      if linux is going to get anywhere, idiots must be able to use it, as they are the dominant portion of the populus.
    • This point is totally valid because Ubuntu is the only Linux distro available and.. oh wait..
      • The commandline isn't about "hardcore" or "my dick is bigger" it is about efficiency. Likewise vim vs. notepad (or vi keybindings vs. mouse). Freshman and sophomores all want visual studio or eclipse. Juniors/Seniors/Grad.s start being more concerned with how fast they can work than how easy it is to work slowly.
    • Re:%139.5 (Score:5, Informative)

      by J0nne (924579) on Thursday November 22 2007, @04:09PM (#21448593)
      If you'd RTFA, you'd have read that you could pick multiple distro's. The question was 'which Linux distributions do you run in your organisation', and apparently lots of organisations run several different distro's, instead of standardising on one.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Well, I could have believed %100 Since this survey was filled out by linux users, but %139.5 ?!!!
      Am I the only one who sees a problem with the math here?

      Yes. If you bothered to RTFA:

      "Yes, that does add up to more than 100 percent. It would seem that groups using Linux in the office have not standardized on a particular distribution, or even a distribution family."

      Linux users are - amazingly - capable of using more than one OS at once. I know this is anathema to those who believe that the only alternative to white is black, and for whom anything less than perfect logical symmetry causes cranial asplosion. But hey, we got into weird territory right fro

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          WTF kind of math is that? Shouldn't it really be:

          Ubuntu = 2/4 = 50%
          Red Hat = 2/4 = 50%


          No, it should be just as it was written. It's the percentage of *users* who answered the survey, not the percentage of all answers that were a particular answer.

          Given your sample data, ~67% of *users* use each of the operating systems.
        • No, because 2/3 of users do use Ubuntu, and 2/3 of users do use Red Hat.
      • " I have boxen that run all three."

        You maybe have three Linux boxen but by the very use of the word "boxen" you already showed you own no common sense so your opinion is moot and ignored.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Unless Linux and other UNIXes are seriously simplified for new computer users, their market share will never really rise. Even us nerds have headaches trying to get simple hardware working, and most people I know had never even heard of Linux or any other UNIX variant (apart from, occasionally, Mac OS X) until I brought up the subject in conversation. There needs to be a serious publicity campaign around this issue.
      Why? Does it matter what other people use?
      • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

        1. Only 20000 Linux users filled out the survey - and, TBH, that would most likely exclude the technophobic average Joes who have Ubuntu installed on their box after a their local technopath installed it, and
        2. I myself think that it's not important what distro anyone's using - what's important is that UNIX still hasn't got a foothold on the desktop market. In fact, it would be wise to educate people that instead of the 'crippled/expensive' balance to strike with Windows, there's bound to be a Linux distro or U
    • by Belial6 (794905) on Thursday November 22 2007, @05:11PM (#21449075) Homepage
      I'm not sure you get to call yourself a nerd. I'm thinking that you are just so isolated that in comparison to the few other people you've met, you seem like the one that understands computers. The reason I say this, is that at least half of the people I run into know what Linux is, and most of the other half don't know the difference between Word and Windows, so they wouldn't know what it is, even if it was down right common in the home. That, and the "apart from, occasionally, Mac OS X" line. Really, you have to be pretty far removed from society to not know about Mac.

      My experiences have been exactly the opposite of yours. I considered 2007 the year of Linux when my wife was hosting a play date for stay at home Moms and their children, I came out of my office for some coffee, and there are 4 stay at home housewives discussing who is running Linux, who is running Windows, and if it was a good idea for the ones running Windows to switch to Linux. That was the defining moment for me to say that Linux is officially mainstream.

      As for headaches trying to get simple hardware working, I can only relate the story that I have told many times before... My son did his first, unassisted install of Ubuntu just prior to his second birthday. The only thing I gave him was the CD, a computer, and made sure the hard drive was formatted before he started. As, always, I will accept that he is a genetic mutant that makes his intellect vastly superior to normal humans, if you insist on it, but even if he was as smart as a 6 year old when he was only 1, that still means that Linux is extremely easy to install and use. Of course if it turns out that I am an overly optimistic dad with a child that is only average, then we need to consider whether we can safely have those that are unable to install Ubuntu, out in public without a handler.
      • Wow, you had wireless working on MS-DOS??

        Seriously, it sounds like you may have a broadcom wireless card - that's a problem that really needs to be fixed somehow. Hopefully you give it (Linux) another chance some time when you have more time. Many of the "command line fixes" are actually easier than tracking down drivers and installing them in XP - once you're familiar with the platform.
      • Tell Broadcom that they need to provide specs for their hardware or even binary linux drivers. Or, spend $40 and buy an Intel 3945.
    • You're right. (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Almahtar (991773) on Thursday November 22 2007, @08:47PM (#21450331) Journal
      No single year will have credit because the change is happening slowly but surely.

      Is Linux ready as a desktop? Hell yes.

      Are all the 3rd party apps necessary for every customer available on Linux? Hell no!

      Is that changing day by day, app by app? Yes.

      It's only a matter of time. Standard consumer needs are already being met by desktop distrobutions. Before long the application base will increase and fringe cases will be covered. At that point, an OS will actually have to give you a reason (not "all the apps you want only run on our OS!") to spend money on it. Wouldn't that be nice - them having to earn their money.
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        I guess I'll get modded down, but in my last job we were forced to program for Windows because that's what everyone uses.

        But we move from C++ to C# and suddenly 95% of our code was cross platform. I think you'll find that the more companies that shift to C#, the more software will start appearing on Linux.

        Mono is a good thing. OK you may hate if from a 'freedom' point of view, but it sure enabled my program with freedom to move to Linux...