Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Microsoft Hires Director of Linux Interoperability

Posted by kdawson on Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:37 AM
from the over-to-the-dark-side dept.
AlexGr sends us to Todd Bishop's blog in the Seattle PI for news that Microsoft has brought someone aboard to serve as its Director of Linux Interoperability and head up the Microsoft/Novell Interoperability Lab. "...his name will be familiar to people in the open-source community. In an e-mail late Thursday night, a Microsoft representative said the role will be filled by Tom Hanrahan, who was most recently the director of engineering at the Linux Foundation, the group created through the recent combination of the Free Standards Group and the Open Source Development Labs."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • no... (Score:3, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 08 2007, @10:39AM (#19438241)
    Judas ! Go to the creationist museum where you belong.
  • Finally (Score:5, Funny)

    by HalAtWork (926717) on Friday June 08 2007, @10:40AM (#19438255)
    NOW things will finally start getting better between MS and Linux!
    • Re:Finally (Score:4, Funny)

      by hahiss (696716) on Friday June 08 2007, @11:08AM (#19438795) Homepage
      Great---*now* I will be able to get MS Office and Windows Media Player! And we can replace the standard *nix shells with cmd.exe.

      I hope they will release .deb files for 'em. . . .
    • Re:Finally (Score:5, Insightful)

      by walt-sjc (145127) on Friday June 08 2007, @11:23AM (#19439111)
      Seriously, what this means is that MS will become more compatible with Linux, not making Linux more compatible with MS products from an interoperability standpoint.

      For example: better NFS client / serving from Windows server, Office being able to read (not write) ODF, running Linux applications on Windows, stuff like that. Things that help people migrate OFF Linux. There may be a side effect that some things in Linux will work better with MS, but that is a side effect and not intended behavior.

      If MS was serious about working with Linux in a positive way, they would be releasing proper documentation on their file formats and network protocols with no strings attached (such as massive license fees.) Unless forced to do so (by the EU) this will NEVER happen.

      • You have to understand what "interop" means.

        The idea is a simple one. You want to lock people into your own platform while providing a migration path away from the other platforms. In short you want your customers to see all other platforms as legacy systems.

        This is the entire process behind SUA, Identity Services for UNIX, and the like.

        It is also the idea behind Samba, WINE, Mono, etc.

        Thus, from a Linux perspective, while it would make my life easier to have more UNIX/Linux interop from Microsoft, what w
        • by Rob Y. (110975) on Friday June 08 2007, @02:12PM (#19442315)
          Remember that when Microsoft was trying to get into the file/print/email server game, Novell was the leader in the field. But to win, Microsoft merely had to more or less match their functionality and throw in some price cuts and desktop tie-ins to sweeten the deal.

          With Linux, this is harder. They can't use a price advantage to 'choke off the air supply'. Or can they? To me, that's what the Novell patent deal is all about (from MS's point of view, at least). To un-freeify Linux. Microsoft is confident that they can compete on a level playing field. After all, they have a huge starting advantage, plus they still have the ability to tie their server products to their desktop products. But they can no longer undercut on price. That is, unless they convince the marketplace that free Linux is illegal, and the only way to get Linux is to pay Novell's price. Then they can once again price Novell out of the market.

          At least one of the Linux-esque ways of doing business is running servers for free, or at least without per-seat licensing. If that goes away, at least a large part of those Linux fans will lose some of their attachment.
        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          Maybe it means that Windows will get EXT2/EXT3 file system support in order to read Linux partitions.

          That support is already there [fs-driver.org]. Though it would be better if it was in Windows by default.

          Maybe it means that Linux will get a Microsoft approved NTFS file system support for Linux so it can finally write to NTFS partitions.

          That also is possible [ntfs-3g.org], and it works quite well.

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          It's not "what Linux is doing right", it's "what can we add to Windows to make Linux unnecessary?" It's all about market share, and doing whatever it takes to make your product more attractive. Personally, I find Windows as attractive as an oil refinery, but when you are dealing with a corporate CIO mentality that everything must be single platform, it will become harder to get Linux / Solaris / BSD in the door when Windows can do what those OS's can do.
    • Re:Finally (Score:5, Funny)

      by ciroknight (601098) on Friday June 08 2007, @11:36AM (#19439375)
      In other news, we got our hands on an early version of this press release:
      HELL, Earth. June 8th, 2007. (NASDAQ: HELQ) Hell has Frozen Over.

      In a shocking event, Hell has taken on an icy interior today. Says one demon, "It's actually quite nice, what with the flying bacon and all." Operators of the Infernal Furnace spoke to us briefly: "All the sudden our computers froze", "We were installing a Microsoft Service Pack and all the sudden a penguin came on the screen and the whole environment changed." Hell has scheduled a press conference to happen later this week where we will receive an update on this situation.

      Representatives at Microsoft were not available for comment.

      Contacts:
      Lucifer,
      666-666-1234
      lucifer@inhell.com

      Steve Ballmer,
      666-666-1233
      therealdevil@inhell.com
      • Now Windows will have 200 distributions with subtle changes between them.

        Errr..
        Windows Vista [gadgetell.com]
        Windows Vista Home Basic (and Home Basic N) - A simple version of Windows Vista that is aimed at single PC homes.
        Windows Vista Home Premium - Whole home entertainment and personal productivity throughout the home and on the go.
        Windows Vista Business (and Business N) - Previously Windows Vista Professional Edition, Windows Vista Business is roughly analogous to XP Pro today.
        Windows Vista Enterprise - Optimiz

  • Wow... (Score:3, Funny)

    by nametaken (610866) on Friday June 08 2007, @10:40AM (#19438271)
    Can you imagine how bad that guy gets razzed by his coworkers?!
    • by cyberianpan (975767) on Friday June 08 2007, @11:01AM (#19438677)
      And Brad Smith, senior vice president, general counsel and corporate secretary at Microsoft, is rumoured to have gotten quite concerned about this development. After reading case law on "duty of care" that an employer ought extend to employees he has arranged for Tom Hanrahan to immediately go on advanced "object avoidance course" which will be taught by crack martial arts instructors. Microsoft is refusing to confirm rumours that Hanrahan is currently in a Seattle gymn with 10 instructors & a number of pieces of "office furniture".
  • his name will be familiar to people in the open-source community. In an e-mail late Thursday night, a Microsoft representative said the role will be filled by Tom Hanrahan,


    Are you sure you don't mean... SATAN!???
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 08 2007, @10:42AM (#19438293)
    ...back in those days, it amounted to little more than a means to migrate from Netware to an NT domain. The Unix compatibility stuff that exists now amounts to about the same. I wonder what Microsoft has in mind with all this? It would be weird if it was more than "one way" compatibility.
  • Yet another Linux person that will work at MSFT for a short bit, then get the heck outta Redmond once he sees how screwed up things really are from the inside.
  • hehe (Score:3, Funny)

    by QuantumG (50515) <qg@biodome.org> on Friday June 08 2007, @10:43AM (#19438341) Homepage Journal

    here's an InternetNews.com interview with him from December 2004.
    Couldn't get a quote huh? Gee, I wonder why. I bet if you did get a quote out of him it would be all about his best intentions and how he's going to change things at Microsoft, etc. Give him 6 months, the optimism and naivety will fade away and he'll say repeating the company line.

    Evil is insidious.
    • Re:hehe (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Dan Ost (415913) on Friday June 08 2007, @11:09AM (#19438803)
      How about we wait until we've actually heard from him before we jump to conclusions. It's always possible that he'll either be marginally effective or that he'll bail out once he decides he can't accomplish anything useful.

      No need to assume he'll become evil.

      Not yet, anyway.
  • re (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 08 2007, @10:47AM (#19438423)
    Bill: Tom, I am your father.
    Tom: Really?
    Bill: No, but I hve tons of money for you!
    Tom: Dark side it is!
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        Well....actually, he can't rejoin the project, or anything similar to anything that he worked on while at MS. It would be too dangerous to accept his contributions. I suppose that he could do documentation...but I don't think it would even be safe to accept his comments on possible improvements to the user interface.

        Still, outside of that you're correct. The star system tends to highlight one particular individual out of a large number of nearly equal merit. If the star leaves, an understudy is likely t
  • Typo. (Score:5, Funny)

    by guffe (771664) on Friday June 08 2007, @10:48AM (#19438431) Homepage
    I believe the title should be: Microsoft Hires Director of Linux Inoperability Slashdot should read through their posts more carefully in the future, so that typos like this doesn't happen.
  • ODF (Score:4, Insightful)

    by SanityInAnarchy (655584) <ninja@slaphack.com> on Friday June 08 2007, @10:48AM (#19438439) Journal
    That is what Microsoft would do if they were serious about interoperability with anyone. They'd support ODF -- natively, not through some third-party open source plugin. They'd drop OpenXML. And they'd stop lobbying governments who want to stardardize on a real document format.

    Or, hell, send some developers over to the Wine project.

    Since none of this is happening, I can only assume that this "Linux interoperability" guy is either a complete hypocrite, or is going to have no real power within the company.
    • Re:ODF (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Bert64 (520050) <bert@@@slashdot...firenzee...com> on Friday June 08 2007, @11:18AM (#19438997) Homepage
      They want windows desktops and servers to interoperate with linux servers...
      Why? because linux has a significant server marketshare, and they are FORCED to interoperate with it or face losing marketshare themselves.
      Linux however has very little desktop market share, so it's more profitable for microsoft to ignore it and thus make it harder for people to migrate to linux.

      Ever noticed how a lot of the interoperability between windows and other os's centers around those os's implementing proprietary protocols from windows, rather than windows implementing standards from other os's. There have been a few other cases where microsoft have been forced to implement standards to interoperate (tcp/ip, image formats etc) but they have always preferred to force their own proprietary implementations on people if they will stick (netbeui, bmp etc).
    • Re:ODF (Score:4, Funny)

      by hxnwix (652290) on Friday June 08 2007, @11:38AM (#19439417) Journal

      They'd support ODF -- natively, not through some third-party open source plugin. They'd drop OpenXML.
      How much more open could the be? OpenXML is an open standard! Look, in order to parse an OpenXML document, you simply open Microsoft word and ...
  • Connections (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Gryle (933382) on Friday June 08 2007, @10:51AM (#19438491)
    I have no idea why, but for some reason "Director of Linux Interoperability" brings to mind the US Drug Czar and the War on Drugs
  • by democrates (1055572) on Friday June 08 2007, @10:57AM (#19438591)
    Cut the guy some slack, they're probably holding his family hostage. Seriously though, MS issue recruitment staff with MIB memory blanker gizmos. You meet, POOF!, and then believe them when they say "We are your friends! Ak. Akak Ak Ak!"
  • by pjviitas (1066558) on Friday June 08 2007, @10:57AM (#19438603)
    ...Vista is just another Linux distribution. Buying Novell was the first step in establishing IP claims on Linux. The suits have already arrived to take away Linux...we just don't know it yet. This of course won't stop those of us who really know how Linux came about...but when Microsoft is done they will have the masses believing they invented it. Just my 2 cents. Hedghog
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      You know maybe finally by some stroke of genious , MS realized the real money is not in selling the OS but the apps that lay on top of the OS.

      Linux for years now has become a server competitor , unix was the main server os for awhile , and small servers are dominated by windows. Maybe they finally got the hint that their os is insecure by nature.

      I would love to see a windows rewrite from the ground up. Completely based on security and some of the fundamentals that make windows so easy to use. It is possible
  • by Black-Man (198831) on Friday June 08 2007, @11:00AM (#19438645)
    As director of Linux sue-ability?
  • by Locutus (9039) on Friday June 08 2007, @11:18AM (#19439003)
    Didn't Microsoft and Sun sign a deal to "interoperate" a few years ago? Where has THAT gone?

    BTW, Microsoft does not want to interoperate with Linux and OSS. They want it gone, so any "talk" about deals and smoke-mirror agreements will only flounder, stall, and drag on forever. Anybody who believe otherwise is just fooling themselves.

    LoB
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        the aspect of the "zero sum game" where only one winner can exist is exactly how Microsoft plays the game. There's where the similarities to Microsoft's 'game' and the "zero sum game" end. They don't play the none-zero-sum game either since they've shown that their partnerships ends with Microsoft taking the partners business, ie, only one winner.

        There is just so much history of this that anybody who would even consider a partnership with Microsoft must be playing out their exit strategies for their busines
  • by mattgreen (701203) on Friday June 08 2007, @11:19AM (#19439035)
    I can't wait to read all sorts of interesting theories on how this will really work from people who have never been inside Microsoft, yet feel the need to 'enlighten' us with their ignorance. In order to help us positively identify people most participating in groupthink, please use one or more of the following memes so we can divvy out moderation points faster:

    * Ballmer throwing chairs
    * Embrace, extend, extinguish
    * Clippy hate
    * Funny BSOD jokes

    In the meantime, I'm curious who took the job, because people will hate them for no reason now. Ah zealotry, without thee, what would I do on this site?
  • Would some of those who seem to have a brain built for more than just Pro Linux or pro Linux or anti- whatever rants PLEASE comment on whether they think this will be a good thing or a bad thing and why? because I don't know a thing about this person.
  • Smoke and mirrors (Score:3, Insightful)

    by fishfinger (685260) on Friday June 08 2007, @11:33AM (#19439315)
    If Microsoft were serious about interoperability, the solution is simple, just release (patent free) documentation for file formats and protocols.

    Anything else is just smoke and mirrors.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      If Microsoft were serious about interoperability, the solution is simple, just release (patent free) documentation for file formats and protocols.

      I don't really get how releasing information like "The .doc format is a basically a memory dump of certain parts of Microsoft Word" would be useful...

      The problem is, we understand the file formats, they're just small pieces of memory dumps of what Microsoft Word uses internally. In order to implement them correctly you would need to emulate the DESIGN of what Micr

  • Pesky tags... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by dr00g911 (531736) on Friday June 08 2007, @11:48AM (#19439605)
    I know that yes/no/maybe/haha weren't entirely useful as tags except for a quick laugh (not debating the inherent usefulness of tags at all, which I feel debatable).

    itsatrap would be completely apropos here.

    Just sayin'... the tagging system currently may as well be a checkbox list of categories. Not exactly user generated.
  • Quick Question (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Seraphim_72 (622457) on Friday June 08 2007, @01:25PM (#19441443)
    Tom, if you happen to read Slashdot, just how many of Novell's 30 pieces of silver do you get?

    Sera
    • Tom, if you happen to read Slashdot, just how many of Novell's 30 pieces of silver do you get?
      Actually, I'm not unhappy Microsoft got Tom, he was a largely ineffectual paper pusher at OSDL, with little community contact, empathy. I don't doubt that Microsoft's real agenda is to find new ways to inhibit Linux interoperability, and Tom is just the man to fail at that.
    • Re:Once again (Score:5, Insightful)

      by QuantumG (50515) <qg@biodome.org> on Friday June 08 2007, @11:10AM (#19438833) Homepage Journal
      It would be good news.

      If we lived in that universe where "Director of Linux Interoperability" actually meant what you think it means. Unfortunately, out in the REAL WORLD, that title actually means "Director of increasing the perception of interoperability with Linux system while actually making them less compatible."

      So yeah, keep living in your dream world.

      • Microsoft doesn't play with words like that. Just think of all the genuine advantages windows provides to users through WGA.
    • Re:Once again (Score:5, Informative)

      by Jussi K. Kojootti (646145) on Friday June 08 2007, @11:18AM (#19439007)

      Once again I expect to get beaten to death by zealots moderators but I really don't care. Getting karma back on slashdot is really easy screaming a pair of "linuzz rocks" and "OMG MS copies Apple again", so I don't care getting modded down by expressing MY opinion, which is as valid as anyone elses.

      ...

      Not a troll or flaimbait, but mod me so... I don't care. I can fake my stupid karma back. I've done so a houndred of times. Getting karma is easy. losing it by expressing a valid opinion is a honor,

      Personally I think that even mentioning moderation ("I know I'll be modded down for this, but..") is pretty lame. You just spent half your post brooding over it.
    • linuzz rocks
      OMG MS copies Apple again
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Microsoft had their own Unix back in the day:
      Xenix [wikipedia.org]
    • by mangu (126918) on Friday June 08 2007, @11:22AM (#19439101)
      I still think MS will have a linux variant by 2015.


      I'd say much sooner than that. These days Microsoft's cash cow is Office, not Windows. As GWB is having some trouble in maintaining his Google bomb [google.com], Microsoft will soon realize that MS-Office in Linux is a better business model for them than OpenOffice in Linux.

        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          ReactOS isn't a Linux variant by any means. It's an attempt to reimplement Windows completely from the ground up, without using any Linux components.