Slashdot Log In
Three Takers Named for Microsoft's Linux Support
Posted by
Zonk
on Thu Dec 21, 2006 04:36 PM
from the step-right-up dept.
from the step-right-up dept.
narramissic writes "According to an article on ITworld, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank AG, and AIG Technologies have signed on for Microsoft's technical support for Novell Inc.'s Suse Enterprise Linux. This follows last month's announcement of a deal between Novell and Microsoft that Steve Ballmer described as an effort to 'bridge the divide between open-source and proprietary-source software.' None of the companies cited the price of the support certificates, nor would they say how many they were activating. Even more interesting, Credit Suisse is a brand new customer for Novell."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
And so it begins. (Score:5, Insightful)
Customer: "Please don't hurt me."
Ballmer: "These are some lovely client server apps you have here, it would be a shame if something were to.. happen to them..."
Customer: "Okay.. okay, I'll pay.... I'll pay" [quiet weeping].
-GiH
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Ballmer: "Can you squeal like a pig?"
Re:And so it begins. (Score:5, Funny)
So when is
Parent
Thirty pieces of silver... (Score:3, Insightful)
Never, we are way to scientifically mindied here to resort to Biblical symbolism. However we are quite mean enough to, say.... superimpose a portrait of Vidkun Quisling [wikipedia.org] over the Novell logo.... Mwuhahahahahahahahaha!
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
there would of been no arm twisting there.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Bridging The Divide (Score:3, Insightful)
So which way does Ballmer expect to bridge this door?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I thought the whole point of the deal was that people need to buy SUSE or else they're open to liability.
Seriously though, spiritual violations of the GPL aside, if I was an IT department using both Linux and Microsoft products it would seem to make sense to use SUSE since Microsoft and Novell work together.
Microsoft providing Linux Support? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Great. (Score:5, Funny)
Can you imagine? (Score:2)
<full body shudder>
I'd feel like I'd been shot down behind enemy lines. Or maybe more like a galley slave.
Re:Can you imagine? (Score:4, Insightful)
I think the only real problem here was the deliberate attempt to undermine the GPL. In the end, though, the effect is not as bad as we think. GPLv3 plugs the loophole, a Linux vendor gets a ton of cash from Microsoft, and life goes on. I don't like Novell getting in bed with Microsoft, but it's not like they had a whole lot of choice. $400 million is a lot to turn down on the basis of "principles", "morals" or "ethics". The important thing is that the timing of the announcement allowed the GPL to be developed to prevent any further deals of this nature to be made.
mandelbr0t
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
and Hubert Mantel rejoins Novell (Score:2, Insightful)
http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS6962961128.html [linux-watch.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re:and Hubert Mantel rejoins Novell (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:and Hubert Mantel rejoins Novell (Score:4, Informative)
It's easy enough to say that, but Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank AG, and AIG Technologies are not likely to be very happy when the next version of Samba rolls out and they can't use it because it is licensed under version 3 of the GPL and Novell can't distribute GPLv3 apps and still maintain its deal with Microsoft.
Novell has a vested interest in keeping the Free Software community happy because there is no way that Novell can compete if it has to maintain its own forks of popular Free Software projects. Novell is having enough trouble trying to convince customers that a migration from Netware to SuSE Linux makes more sense than a migration from Netware to Windows. The last thing Novell needs is this sort of drama.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Novell will continue to be able to distribute GPLv2 versions of Samba. However, the new versions and added functionality will be unavailable to Novell and Novell's customers. Old versions of Samba are hardly a recipe for increased interoperability with Windows. Now, Novell could try and fork Samba from the newest GPLv2 version and compete with the official branch, but seeing as how Novell just lost their chief Samba hacker that's not likely to be a very good plan. Even if they could keep up Novell will
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Sure, Novell could swap out Samba for something written by Microsoft that does the same thing. Of course then Novell would be 100% dependent on Microsoft for an important piece of its network operating system stack. Beta versions of Samba are currently able to completely replace an AD domain controller. What do you think the chances are of Microsoft delivering something like that to Novell? If Microsoft's Samba replacement is anything like the other bits and pieces of UNIX software Microsoft has written
Re:Yawn (Score:3, Insightful)
Sure...but only until some overpaid executive can't get his second yacht because of revenue shortfalls. This is only as permanent as there is money to be made.
Why? - Credit Suisse in particular (Score:4, Insightful)
What am I missing?
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
I'll indulge in pure speculation. (Score:2)
You'd think so, wouldn't you?
But suppose Microsoft was offering those licenses on a "free" evaluation basis? Note that no one is talking about how many licenses Credit Suisse activated. Even one person trying one "free" license just to see how it worked would meet the criteria identified in that story.
On the other hand, Novell's marketing efforts in the past have sucked beyond belief. It wo
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
You're not missing anything based on the evidence available to us. The conclusion is that there's something behind the scenes. It makes me wonder what sort of deals are being made between Microsoft and the directors at Novell.
Re:Why? - Credit Suisse in particular (Score:5, Informative)
According to Matt Asay over at InfoWorld, [infoworld.com] this story is incorrect, or at best exaggerated. He says he has it on authority that all the companies mentioned in the story had been using both Suse and Red Hat for some time.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Wonder where they got their information?
What's so intresting ? (Score:2, Insightful)
What's so intresting about that ?
It's not like Microsoft would start companies to make it look like people are actually supporting this thing.
Re: (Score:2)
A sales company (Score:2)
Why, oh way would you buy Linux support from Microsoft!
"Support" (Score:5, Interesting)
Honestly, the word "support" to me has almost no meaning anymore. It's been thrown out there so many times as the deciding factor in a purchase, however I've yet to see really useful support. I've dealt with companies big and small and have never resolved a difficult issue in less than an hour with their supplied support.
All I care about anymore is whether they give you the proper tools to solve the problem yourself. Proper documentation and the source code (yes, smaller companies will give you source code if you are big enough and that's the deal breaker). I'll take that over a level I phone jockey any day!
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
None of that. It means "paid scapegoat", i.e. job security for IT professionals who, instead of getting fired for the inevitable IT problems, can shift the blame for those onto the
Masochists. (Score:5, Funny)
Tagging Beta (Score:2)
BAD Headline... (Score:5, Informative)
My only regret (Score:2)
So I could close em.
They are... (Score:5, Funny)
If you can't beat 'em, make money off of 'em (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
This is like having a Mercedes and have it serviced by BMW.
Re:itsatrap (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Naw, I like Neal Stephenson's analogy [cryptonomicon.com], because then it would be like having an M1 tank, made of space-age materials and jammed with sophisticated technology from one end to the other, that's been modified in such a way that it never, ever breaks down, is light and maneuverable enough to use on ordinary streets, and uses no more fuel than a subcompact car, and taking it to a station wagon car company to have it serviced.
Finally, (Score:4, Funny)
Actually, make that a perfect car analogy.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
To use another bogeyman to illustrate it... this is like Sony "offering" to "service" Xbox 360s, or something.
I've already seen some other analogies put forth, and I find this is one case where they are friggin' hilarious, and appropriate
Blind MS bashing?! Are you kidding?! (Score:5, Insightful)
What?! Microsoft's CEO basically threatens companies that use Linux, and Microsoft isn't at fault?!
And I suppose if Guido says, "Bad things might happen to your family, Mr. Anonymous Coward, unless you pay me some 'protection' money...", then it isn't Guido's fault if you pay him for protection you don't actually need???
And you got modded Insightful! Unbelievable!
I, for one, am getting pretty tired of people whining that Microsoft gets unfairly bashed here on Slashdot too often. I regularly read plenty of responses that defend Microsoft that get modded +5 Insightful.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It's incredible, it's almost as if some people have a different viewpoint to your own! How could that be?
In other news... (Score:2, Funny)