Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Cuba Switching to Linux

Posted by Zonk on Thu May 19, 2005 08:12 AM
from the comrade-tux dept.
Tony Montana writes "According to several news sites the government of Cuba is dumping Windows in favour of Linux. Cuba's director of information technology, Roberto del Puerto, says that Cuba already has approximately 1500 computers running on Linux, and is working towards replacing Windows on all state owned computers."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by MarsDude (74832) on Thursday May 19 2005, @08:14AM (#12576965) Homepage
    how many people will make a comment about communism and linux....

    this is 1
    • by cnelzie (451984) on Thursday May 19 2005, @08:52AM (#12577374) Homepage
      ...how an American Company is able to do business that results in benefits to Cuba.

      Microsoft is an American corporation, it isn't legally allowed to profit from or provide goods or services that are shipped to Cuba. If I am understanding the US Trade Embargo correctly...
    • by DenDave (700621) on Thursday May 19 2005, @09:19AM (#12577757)
      Communix?

      Marxism Linism?

      The Shining PATH?

      Mao's Red Hat?

      chkguevarra?

      This is the sound of C.. [muziekcentrum.be]
    • by smchris (464899) on Thursday May 19 2005, @11:20AM (#12579475)

      They already have a health care system that costs a fraction of U.S. care and provides a similar mean population longevity. Linux seems like a natural complement to that efficiency.

      But what if they decide to host the North American linux conference some year and nobody in the U.S. can go?
      • by myc_lykaon (645662) on Thursday May 19 2005, @08:45AM (#12577310)
        It is ironic that the real communists want to use GNU/Linux because it is free as in beer.

        I think you'll find they are wanting to use it as it is 'free' as in 'not produced by a company in the country that has maintained a remarkably schizophrenic attitude to Cuba, attempted numerous coups and asassination attempts against the leader and is currently forcing the general populace to live below the poverty line by punitive trade embargoes all based on misplaced ideology' :).

        • America is pretty much the only country not trading with Cuba directly. In spite of that, millions in US currency flow into Cuba every month through indirect routes, including the sizable Cuban population who fled to the US for love of freedom. Overall, Cuba has a national GDP of $33.92 billion, which gives them a far better per-capita than most other countries with similar poverty levels.

          The reality simply is that Cuba is run by a corrupt and incompetant military dictator whose only prior qualification was being a spoiled rich kid and lawyer. The complete mismanagement of the economy by his everlasting regime led to scarcity, and the spoils system inherent in any communist regime has led to a disparity whereby most Cubans live in abject poverty, but the priveledged few live in opulant comfort.

          Cuba is not even a good example of how a communist ought to be run, but it is an excellent example of how communist governments eventually are run.
          • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 19 2005, @09:51AM (#12578193)
            Have you ever BEEN to Cuba? Oh wait, you're American.. never mind... Cuba may be Communist, but did you ever stop to think that Castro and Gueverra (sp) freed the Cubans from a much worse dictator (Batista) I've spent some time in Cuba (Canadians are allowed to travel wherever we want, ahh freedom!) And the people there are doing quite well thank you very much.
              • Re:FUC#ING LIAR!!! (Score:5, Informative)

                by Rei (128717) on Thursday May 19 2005, @10:56AM (#12579164) Homepage
                I know you're a troll, but I'll bite.

                Cuba had the lowest malnutrition rate [fao.org] in Latin America from 1979-1992, before the US intensified sanctions. Its estimated number of malnourished as of the report date (2000) was 1.8 million, i.e. ~5%. This is almost completely due to the increased embargo; not being able to buy from the US (its nearest potential supplier) increases costs by about 30%; caloric intake during the time dropped 38%. Even still, for comparison, about 30 million Mexicans (~%28) are malnourished. Who is crying them a river?

                As for your "ex-cuban" relatives, you are staring in the face the classic example of "selection bias". If they weren't anti-castro/anti-communist, they wouldn't have fled to the US, now would they?
          • by Simonetta (207550) on Thursday May 19 2005, @10:05AM (#12578394)
            Overall, Cuba has a national GDP of $33.92 billion,

            The reality simply is that Cuba is run by a corrupt and incompetant military dictator whose only prior qualification was being a spoiled rich kid and lawyer.

            It sounds to me like Big Bill would be quite comfortable here, when he decides to retire. At only $33 Billion, he could just buy the whole place. Imagine him growing out his hair and having his image replacing all those of Che.

            He could be just as corrupt and incompetent as he wants to be and no one would notice the difference. He'd have to get used to making eight hour speeches about the evil imperialist Linux worms, but we got pills now that make that no problem.

            As for the rest of us, we'd finally get a real high quality English/Spanish translator built into
            Windows!
          • by Quantum Fizz (860218) on Thursday May 19 2005, @11:53AM (#12579852)
            When have you ever visited Cuba, and how do you claim that you know the 'reality'?

            Castro was a rich kid and lawyer, but he only took from that his education, if you knew anything about the revolution you'd know he lived in poverty in the revolutionary camps out in the boonies. You'd also know that the rich folks like his family tended to support the corrupt Batista regime, and that Castro had the courage to fight against the inequality, while nearly ALL other rich families supported Batista.

            You complain about the average Cuban living in poverty but you miss the following - ALL Cubans have access to government-issued food, education, and medical care. That's EVERYBODY, from the chauffer who drives Castro around to a dentist in Havana to a farmer in la Isla de Juventud.

            You also complain about poverty but neglect to mention 90% of that poverty is due to the trade embargo by the USA. Cuba is a third-world country, that is definitely true. Now if you look at its income and compare to other countries of similar income you'll see that Cuba is far far ahead of other countries. Many residents of Latin America admire Castro for what he has done for Cuba, especially in light of all the aggression the USA has against them.

            • by orzetto (545509) on Thursday May 19 2005, @01:13PM (#12580815)

              I was in Cuba in I think 1992, in the middle of the periodo especial, when western press reported of continuous power outages, no running water, oppressive policing. We (me and dad) were in a group of 8 tourists, and there was no VIP among us, so no chance they were polishing the country for us (though the tour guides obviously did not bring us to the worst conceivable places).

              Facts observed:

              1. Havana was lit at night, all night long. No power outages observed in the non-hotel neighborhood.
              2. Everybody looked decently cared for, no limos around but there were no starving people as the ones my father had seen in Romania in 1988 (And before you jump: Ceausescu was the most US-friendly East-block leader, there are even pictures of him with Mickey Mouse and such propaganda crap).
              3. People were short on two things: soap and chewing gum.
              4. The most invasive action of policing we witnessed was a policeman picking up empty bottles and putting them in the garbage bin from the street after a late-night street party organised by the locals in Havana. You read "a policeman picking up empty bottles".
              5. I've been to NY last November. Do I have to tell you all where I saw the most striking poverty, in Manhattan or in Pinar del Rio? And don't jump saying "but here we are on average richer", I know that, that's actually my point. With all that wealth, no one seems to want to get rid of poverty, a feat well within range of the American economy.

              Is Cuba a place that had the same leader for too long time? Granted. Is Cuba a place that has a low GNP, much lower than the US'? Granted too. Were the kangaroo trials on three men who tried to hijack a boat to the US and a few days later got executed a shame? Sure bet. Would Cuba be better off with socialism out and market economy in? I say, look at Haiti.

              Lesson learnt: if it's about a country your country does not like, for any reason do not trust the information you get. No matter which country is yours and which the other. Either go and check for yourself, or simply guard your doubts.

          • by BasilBrush (643681) on Thursday May 19 2005, @09:45AM (#12578115)
            Speaking from a third party country, Britain, if you think that the US holds the moral highground over Cuba, you are sadly mistaken. For example, if my company were to trade with Cuba, maybe to import Havana cigars, then the US, who is not party to the trade, and supposedly believes in free trade has a law whereby they can apply sanctions to my company. The way America has bullied Cuba for years, simply because they disagree with it's political system is appaling. During the cold war it was understandable, especially the missile crisis. But this many years after the cold war has ended it is ridiculous.
              • by Kiryat Malachi (177258) on Thursday May 19 2005, @10:13AM (#12578524) Journal
                There are plenty of military dictatorships in the world.

                The US doesn't maintain crippling economic embargos against most of them.

                If you think the US attitude towards Cuba is *anything* other than a relic of the Cold War and the political consequence of the relatively large power wielded by exiles in the arena of Florida politics, you are sadly mistaken. And the sad truth is, Cuba does have the high ground in this.
              • by gowen (141411) <gwowen@gmail.com> on Thursday May 19 2005, @10:29AM (#12578821) Homepage Journal
                A democratic nation, any democratic nation, will always have moral highground over a non-democratic one.
                Which is why the USA chose to overthrow Democratic Socialist Allende and replace him with Fascist Dictator Pinochet, right?

                Look, however much governments (US or otherwise) wish to pretend that their foreign policy is based on morality, it isn't. OK? Foreign policy is solely about protecting your national interests : in terms of finance and security, and the sooner you recognise that, the more sense you'll make of it.

                It's not about good guys vs bad guys, and it's especially not about democracy vs. dictatorship. A dictator friendly to US interests (the House of Saud, for instance) is always going to treated more favourably than an unfriendly democrat (say, the President of France, or "Old Europe" as we like to call ourselves).
                  • by gowen (141411) <gwowen@gmail.com> on Thursday May 19 2005, @11:38AM (#12579679) Homepage Journal
                    one that is slowly turning itself into a democratic monarchy - very much like the (gasp) British government.
                    Oh, do fuck off. Both the US and the UK have undemocratic and unaccountable institutions at the heart of public life. The difference is ours is almost entirely ceremonial, and yours gets to decide the outcome of elections, despite the fact that every member of the Supreme Court is a political appointee (Here's a shock : on that most important issue, they voted on party political allegiances). Here in the UK, we stick to our old fashioned ways of democracy, like actually counting the ballots.
                    The difference between Cuba and Saudi Arabia is that Saudi Arabia is willing to work with the US on making changes
                    Err. No. Don't believe the hype.

                    The Saudi's are still appalling violators of human rights, and the latest Amnesty International reports suggest they're not about to change. The difference between American treatment of Saudi Arabia and Cuba is based on two things :
                    i) Cuba is near, and the spectre of a communist boogeyman still plays well with the US electorate.
                    ii) Access to one of the world's largest reserves of oil is of more strategic importance than access to the world's best cigars.
                  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 19 2005, @12:05PM (#12579989)
                    Oh come on, cut the hypocricy.

                    Fulgencio Batista was a ruthless dictator, but that was all fine and dandy with the US because he was friendly with them. Not so with Cubans, which why Castro et al managed to overthrow him starting off with only 16 people.

                    And in Chile, Salvadore Allende was democratically elected, yet the US helped to overthrow him because he wasn't right-wing enough for them, and so that bastard Pinochet got run run roughshod over Chile for the next few decades. And that was all okay.

                    And in the Dominican Republic, Rafael Trujillo ("he may be a son of a bitch, but he's our son of a bitch") ran a brutal dictatorship all with the help of the US. So why was he okay?

                    And in Nicaragua, Anastasio Somoza ran a disgraceful dictatorship all nicely sponsored by the US for decades. But once again, somehow that was okay but Sandinistas were not.

                    And let's not forget that good buddy of the US, Saddam Hussein, who received assloads of military equipment because it suited the interests of the US.

                    US history is so overrun with embarassing stuff like this it's depressing. But the worst part is that it keeps happening, and most Americans just don't seem to give a damn.

                    • by GodfatherofSoul (174979) on Thursday May 19 2005, @01:23PM (#12580937)
                      Hell, you don't even have to go *that* far back. During the 1st Bush term, we helped stage coups against Aristide in Haiti (sp) and Chavez in Venezuela (both democratically elected). What's so hilarious (in a depressing way) is what happened afterwards. Chavez was brought *back* into power by the people and Aristide simply said in effect "Well, if you Americans claim I left the country voluntarily, then I should be able to go back..."

                      Mind you I'm American, but a lot of us are complete fools scarfing down whatever propaganda our leadership feeds us. I've seen the lie become truth so often in the past few years that I've developed a completely new respect for the foresight of George Orwell. The guy looks like a damned prophet today.
              • by BasilBrush (643681) on Thursday May 19 2005, @12:01PM (#12579940)
                She went to school one day, and the class was told to bow their heads and pray to God for some candy. After they did that, they waited for a while - no candy. Then the class was told to bow their heads and pray to Castro for candy - then a government worker handed each of them a piece of candy. Brainwashing starts in kindergarden in Cuba - she was in that class.

                Interesting. When I was at school in Britain, every morning we said a prayer to God. In America I believe your kids pledge allegance to the flag of the United States of America. Now you might just accept that as a normal thing, but from this side of the pond that looks rather like like "brainwashing starting in kindergarten."

      • by mysticgoat (582871) on Thursday May 19 2005, @09:08AM (#12577596) Journal

        It is ironic that the real communists want to use GNU/Linux because it is free as in beer.

        I just went back through the three articles cited in the story, and I didn't see any mention as to why Cuba was going through the conversion to Linux. Where did you get your information?

        Other than the "free as in beer" reason, these possibilities occur to me:

        • This could be in retaliation for Gates' recent anti-communist remarks
        • This could be based on idealogical concerns about whether information can be owned and controlled by individuals/corporations or belongs to the state
        • This could be a strategic decision to take future software development "in house" rather than depending on 3rd party developers who are based in a hostile country
        • This could be a pragmatic decision based on studies that show that a gradual conversion to Linux now would be better in some ways than the inevitable enforced upgrades to Longhorn / Office2006

        I also question your use of the word "ironic" in this context, but I'll leave discussion of english metallurgy to slashdot's esteemed group of grammar nazis.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 19 2005, @08:14AM (#12576967)

    yeah 1500 computers !!, eat that AMIGA !!

  • by shoppa (464619) on Thursday May 19 2005, @08:15AM (#12576986)
    I'm assuming that all Cuban installations of Windows are pirate copies anyway, because it's illegal for US companies to sell to Cuba (very stiff penalties).
    • If Cuba is using copies of Windows in a legal fashion under Cuban law then they are not pirate copies, even if that use would be illegal under US law.

      It's up to Cuban copyright law to decide whether you should have to pay Microsoft to use copies of their software.

    • Even if they can, Cuba has loved linux for a while - obviously, even if they can they don't want to depend from USA technology. Infomed, for one (the national healtcare information sharing or whatever you english people call it) is based in linux at least
    • by Saven Marek (739395) on Thursday May 19 2005, @08:34AM (#12577203)
      What worries me is importing what is made in cuba into the US.

      What happens when cuban sysadmins start submitting patches into linux? is this not then code that is a product of cuba? that would be Illegal to bring into the USA.

      which then comes into a linux used in the USA?

      This worries me, as then microsoft could use this as a legal loophole to prohibit the use of Linux in the USA.

      That would be a big boon for them as then they would have no competition.

      Think about it. How ridiculous does it sound. Or not?
      • by Quantum Fizz (860218) on Thursday May 19 2005, @12:13PM (#12580081)
        The US policies against Cuba are bad for Cuba, but great for the rest of the world. It has left a Carribean island with great weather, great beaches, great cigars, affordable accomodations and best of all, NO Americans. It's like vacation heaven. Besides, none of you would like it there. Really.

        Well I'm glad you conceited snobs enjoy the embargo while the people of Cuba suffer because of it. The embargo severely cripples the Cuban economy, but hey, let's keep those people in poverty just so a few snobs like yourself can vacation on the Island free of American influences.

        Perhaps you're not aware that not only can the USA not trade with Cuba under the embargo, but any international vessel that trades with Cuba cannot trade with the USA on that same trip. So if you are trading anything, you will aim most of your travels to the USA, because the Cuban imports/exports will not add anythign appreciable.

        You may love keeping the embargo intact so you can take small vacations there like the conceited snob you are, but Cubans have alot of difficulty buying everyday necessities such as medicines, light bulbs, automobile parts, etc because of it.

        You may love great beaches and cigars, which explains your reasons for going. When I (a US citizen) went we brought tens of thousands of dollars worth of medicines that US hospitals were disposing because they were just past their expiration date (but still good for all intents and purposes). The hospitals we visited were extremely gracious for this, medicines are really in short supply there because of the embargo.

        You may like not dealing with Americans travelling in your little vacation paradise, but most cities are poorly lit, with only every 3 or 4 streetlights on. I thought at first this was to save electricity, but it's because they have a very short supply of light bulbs they can get through the embargo.

        You may love the antique cars still driving around (with ridiculous amounts of air pollution), but Cubans have tough times getting automobile parts through the embargo. That's why they still have many old cars from before the embargo was placed. They have tough times not only buying new cars but even replacement parts for old cars. But hey, let's keep them in this state just so you can go and visit this quaint island.

        It's funny how you dislike Americans so much, yet you're in reality far worse than the average American you despise so much.

  • by Timesprout (579035) on Thursday May 19 2005, @08:15AM (#12576989)
    is how the Bay of Penguins incident began...
  • by datadriven (699893) on Thursday May 19 2005, @08:16AM (#12576998) Homepage
    That's great Cuba has such a positive image. This is bound to make people switch to linux in droves.
    • Re:Positive Image (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Ubergrendle (531719) on Thursday May 19 2005, @08:32AM (#12577183) Homepage Journal
      Actually they have quite a positive image in most countries of the world other than the US. Given that they've been US embargoed for several decades and yet still can offer some of the best healthcare and social services in the Caribbean says alot to their efficiency. Castro and the communist government aren't a walk in the park (e.g. human rights abuses, limited democractic rights for population, dictatorial powers) but its not nearly as bad as portrayed in the American media.

      Linux is a good deal for Cuba, as they can't legally buy Windows given the US embargo...actually they can't buy most software under the circumstances. Also, their currency weakness doesn't allow them to trade for services very well. Given that Linux will make the every-day person's life more productive I can't see anyone reasonably opposing Linux adoption in Cuba...the government won't benefit from this directly.
        • Re:Positive Image (Score:5, Interesting)

          by Ubergrendle (531719) on Thursday May 19 2005, @09:00AM (#12577458) Homepage Journal
          Okay smart guy, so why are so many people will to RISK DEATH to escape from Mexico (a democratic nation), Dominican Republic, Jamacia, etc? The horatio alger lure of a better life.

          Its tough to leave Cuba, its true, but even if you could leave Cuba would the US willingly accept everyone, provide them with green cards and citizenship etc? People risk death for a multitude of reasons, and its not just to escape the Castro boogey-man. I also submit that Cuban boat-people refugees make good media copy, but represent a small statistical segment of a) refugees risking entry to the US and b) segment of the Cuban population.

          For the record, I've been to Cuba, toured the countryside ~alone~, and have been invited into people's homes and had dinner with 'normal' people. They're not living in constant fear of the Gestapo, they're not starving poor, and they're not uneducated hicks.

            • by edremy (36408) on Thursday May 19 2005, @09:39AM (#12578011)

              First, there's an issue of degree. There are far more ordinary people in Cuban prisons, who would not be imprisoned in any free country.

              Perhaps. They jail political dissidents. We jail pot smokers. Thus, the US has the highest imprisonment rate in the world. (Or very close- we don't know North Korea's) Cuba's not even in the top ten.

              Second, I wasn't defending the US, I was pointing out that Cuba is still a very repressive place, and those who want to pretend that everything's cool and its problems should just be accepted with a wink are themselves collaborating in the repression of the Cuban people.

              I'd be one of the last to defend Cuba- it's a wreck of a country due to a meglomanical dictator. The world will be a better place when Castro is worm food.

              But other countries simply don't see Cuba with anywhere near the level of hatred in the US. They see us pointing fingers at Cuba's repressive practices while we're busy keeping people in legal limbo forever in our own tiny slice of Cuba.

              If we had cleaner hands other countries might be more willing to listen to us about Cuba.

  • by jocknerd (29758) on Thursday May 19 2005, @08:17AM (#12577021)
    How are we ever going to spy on these countries if they stop using Windows?
  • Great... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ooze (307871) on Thursday May 19 2005, @08:17AM (#12577025)
    All we need is another multi billion dollar company with a reason to lobby for invading Cuba...
  • That's cool... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by agraupe (769778) on Thursday May 19 2005, @08:23AM (#12577093) Journal
    I remember sitting in an internet cafe at a resort in Cuba, wondering why they didn't use linux. Now maybe they will. My personal anecdote aside, I look forward to the day when it will hurt the US not to deal with Cuba; given its current popularity among European and Canadian travellers, I think it is coming. Cuba is still stable, and, indeed, has outlasted the Soviet Union.
    • Re:That's cool... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by PaxTech (103481) on Thursday May 19 2005, @08:30AM (#12577161) Homepage
      Yep, that "stability", it's a wonderful thing. Especially when it's maintained by imprisoning librarians [afsc.org].

      But oh, I forgot, this is slashdot, where the US is a horrible fascist dicatorship and Cuba is a magical wonderland of sharing and human kindness.
      • Re:That's cool... (Score:5, Interesting)

        by elrous0 (869638) on Thursday May 19 2005, @09:07AM (#12577585)
        Yep, that "stability", it's a wonderful thing. Especially when it's maintained by imprisoning librarians.

        And maybe you should keep in mind that a lot of these "innocent" dissendents that are being arrested were or are actively plotting to overthrow the Cuban govenment, or even the assasination of Castro. Look at that shady CIA Posada character that's here in the U.S. now for a great example of one of those "innocent" dissidents.

        I suppose you think the U.S. government wouldn't arrest people plotting the overthrow of the government or the assasination of the president?

        -Eric

  • Other counteries (Score:5, Informative)

    by karvind (833059) <karvind@gmai l . com> on Thursday May 19 2005, @08:38AM (#12577243) Journal
    I just checked back on slashdot to see what other governments are adapting Linux or Open source solutions. Pretty encouraging I would say

    Australia [slashdot.org]

    South Korea [slashdot.org]

    Brazil [slashdot.org]

    Spain [slashdot.org]

    India [slashdot.org]

    Vienna [slashdot.org]

    French Police [slashdot.org]

    Dutch [slashdot.org]

    Venezuela [slashdot.org]

    Germany [slashdot.org]

  • by Bob Cat - NYMPHS (313647) on Thursday May 19 2005, @08:47AM (#12577331) Homepage
    %windowscd%\win98\precopy2.cab\license.txt ...

    7. EXPORT RESTRICTIONS. If this EULA is not labeled and the SOFTWARE PRODUCT is not identified as "North America Only Version" above, on the Product Identification Card, or on the SOFTWARE PRODUCT packaging or other written materials, then the following terms apply: You agree that you will not export or re-export the SOFTWARE PRODUCT to any country, person, or entity subject to U.S. export restrictions. You specifically agree not to export or re-export the SOFTWARE PRODUCT: (i) to any country to which the U.S. has embargoed or restricted the export of goods or services, which as of March 1999 include, but are not necessarily limited to Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Sudan and Syria, or to any national of any such country, wherever located, who intends to transmit or transport the SOFTWARE PRODUCT back to such country; (ii) to any person or entity who you know or have reason to know will utilize the SOFTWARE PRODUCT or portion thereof in the design, development or production of nuclear, chemical or biological weapons; or (iii) to any person or entity who has been prohibited from participating in U.S. export transactions by any federal agency of the U.S. government. You warrant and represent that neither the BXA (as defined below) nor any other U.S. federal agency has suspended, revoked or denied your export privileges.
    • by Otter (3800) on Thursday May 19 2005, @08:22AM (#12577088) Journal
      No, there are privately-owned computers. There used to be internet access available at home, but all dial-up service (except for elites) was suspended about a year and a half ago.

      I submitted it here as a YRO story, but it was deemed less relevant to Your Rights Online than Darl McBride's new open letter in response to Groklaw's new open letter to Darl McBride.

    • I think it might not be a bad idea to amend the GPL to insist that no Communism or politically misaligned countries / organizations should be able to use it. This would help combat some of the negative sterotypes facing OSS.

      But that is the "great" thing about the GPL and similar OSS licenses. Its free to anyone dispite ideological differences. If it wasn't, a F/OSS advocating developer could bar me from using their software because I also use non-Free software. A staunch pro-life developer of a scheduling package could bar an abotion clinic from using their software. If something is going to be free, it needs to be free, not "kinda-free, only when you agree with us"

        • Re:WMDs (Score:5, Informative)

          by daviddennis (10926) <david@amazing.com> on Thursday May 19 2005, @08:40AM (#12577262) Homepage
          I've been to Cuba, and I loved going to Cuba. The people were wonderful - friendly, charming, and Cuban women surely give interested tourists the best welcome one would ever want :-).

          But all I heard from citizens was gripes about the government. The "free" healthcare is worth about as much as you'd expect a dictator's promises to be worth. The capitalist things, like the taxi system, work gloriously. The hotels, being right under the government's thumb, are a model for poor service and bizarre rules. For instance, you can't take your Cuban girlfriend up to your hotel room without paying a bribe.

          I read a lot of books on Cuba before I went, and it seems like people who go to Cuba with an ideological agenda are shuttled carefully to the right places, where things look shiny and new. This is a potemkin village that impresses the heck out of people who want to be impressed.

          But if you go a few blocks away, you see scenes like I did [amazing.com]. All these pictures were taken on what would be prime real estate in any other country, a block or less from the Malecon, the giant seawall that faces the ocean and is a major gathering spot for Cubans.

          Cubans live in their decrepit and dangerous housing until it collapses, because if they maintained it the government would take it over and give it to someone else. No joke, sadly.

          To put this slightly on topic, Cubans are generally not allowed to use the Internet, at least not at prices Cubans can afford. The Internet connections in the tourist hotels are closed to Cubans; only non-Cubans can use them. This is part of an effort to keep tourists on the busses and away from contact with the Cuban people.

          The Cuban computers I saw were woefully out of date, with truly ancient versions of Windows on display. If my memory serves it was mainly Windows98, and I went in December 2002. So I doubt that this mandate from Castro will have that much effect. It's probably a propaganda effort to make Slashdotters look at his rule more favourably.

          Even open source tyranny is still tyranny.

          Alas.

          D